Automated JTpeak analysis by BRAVO

Using BRAVO algorithm (AMPS-LLC, NY, v4.4.0), 5223 ECGs from a publicly available annotated dataset from a randomized clinical trial on four different compounds and placebo were analyzed. ECGs were automatically processed and JTp interval was computed on: 12 standard ECG leads, Vector Magnitude (VM),.and root mean square (RMS) leads. On VM and RMS, JTp intervals were nearly identical (228 +/- 29 vs. 227 +/- 30 ms respectively, with correlation of 0.99, p < 0.0001). On lead II, JTp interval was about 10 ms longer, but highly correlated with that measured on VM (0.94, p < 0.0001). Similarly, on lead V5, JTp was about 8 ms longer than on VM, with a correlation of 0.95, p < 0.0001. When compared to the public available annotations, JTp by BRAVO generated longer (about 8 ms) measurement and evidenced outliers conducible to both the T-wave peak (in few ECGs presenting notched shapes) and, to a lesser degree, to the J point, due to variability of the two algorithms. Differences on the drug-induced effect from the four compounds were negligible. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.