Institutions and frugal innovation: The case of Jugaad

被引:44
作者
Ananthram, Subramaniam [1 ]
Chan, Christopher [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Curtin Business Sch, Sch Management, Int Business, Kent St, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
[2] York Univ, Sch Human Resource Management, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[3] Australian Catholic Univ, Fac Law & Business, North Sydney Campus MacKillop,Level 4,21 Berry St, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia
[4] Univ Rennes 1, Inst Gest Rennes, 11 Rue Jean Mace, F-35708 Rennes 7, France
关键词
Jugaad; Frugal innovation; Neo-institutional perspective; Multinationals; India; PRODUCT INNOVATION; DECISION-MAKING; INDIA; AGENCY; FIRMS; ENTREPRENEURSHIP; LEGITIMACY; FORMS;
D O I
10.1007/s10490-019-09700-1
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Multinationals from emerging markets are embracing frugal innovation. While resource constraints and business opportunities targeting the underserved have been identified as core reasons for the same, we heed to researchers calls for a fine-grained understanding of the formal and informal institutions that promote frugal innovation. Usingjugaad- an ingenious form of indigenous frugal innovation practiced by Indian multinationals as a study context, we utilize a neo-institutional theoretical lens to explore its antecedents and outcomes while explicating the organizational characteristics that enable and sustainjugaad. Our qualitative study with eight Indian multinationals finds thatjugaadis a response to a complex combination of myriad institutional factors that challenge these multinationals to innovate frugally, enabled by specific organizational characteristics that ultimately lead tojugaadoutcomes. Our findings are presented in a conceptual framework that advances the understanding ofjugaadand extends neo-institutional theory to this context. We also provide some future direction for this contemporary stream of research.
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1060
页数:30
相关论文
共 95 条
[51]  
Krishnan RT., 2013, 8 STEPS INNOVATION G
[52]  
Kvale S, 2008, DOING INTERVIEWS
[53]  
Kvale S., 1996, InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
[54]   Better Together: Using Meta-Analysis to Explore Complementarities between Ecological and Institutional Theories of Organization [J].
Lander, Michel W. ;
Heugens, Pursey P. M. A. R. .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2017, 38 (11) :1573-1601
[55]  
Lawrence T.B., 2006, The sage handbook of organization studies, V2nd, P251
[56]   A Composition-Based View of Firm Growth [J].
Luo, Yadong ;
Child, John .
MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2015, 11 (03) :379-411
[57]   How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China [J].
Luo, Yadong ;
Xue, Qiuzhi ;
Han, Binjie .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2010, 45 (01) :68-79
[58]  
Maradana R.P., 2017, J INNOVATION ENTREPR, V6, P1, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13731-016-0061-9
[59]  
Mitchell M.L., 2012, RES DESIGN EXPLAINED
[60]   Innovation in India: A review of past research and future directions [J].
Nair, Anil ;
Guldiken, Orhun ;
Fainshmidt, Stav ;
Pezeshkan, Amir .
ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 32 (04) :925-958