A deep learning approach for hydrological time-series prediction: A case study of Gilgit river basin

被引:97
作者
Hussain, Dostdar [1 ,2 ]
Hussain, Tahir [3 ]
Khan, Aftab Ahmed [2 ]
Naqvi, Syed Ali Asad [4 ]
Jamil, Akhtar [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Geomat, 1 Univ Rd, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[2] Karakuram Int Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Gilgit 15100, Pakistan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Commun Engn, 1 Univ Rd, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[4] Govt Coll Univ, Dept Geog, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[5] Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim Univ, Dept Comp Engn, TR-34303 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Artificial Neural Network; 1D-Convolutional Neural Network; Extreme Learning Machine; Streamflow prediction; Gilgit River; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; MODELS; STREAMFLOW; ALGORITHMS;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-020-00477-2
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Streamflow prediction is a significant undertaking for water resources planning and management. Accurate forecasting of streamflow always being a challenging task for the hydrologist due to its high stochasticity and dynamic patterns. Several traditional and the deep learning models have been applied to simulate the complex nature of the hydrological system. However, to develop and explore a better expert system for prediction is a continuous exertion for hydrological studies. In this study, a deep neural network, namely a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and extreme learning machine (ELM) are explored for one-step-ahead streamflow forecasting for three-time horizons (daily, weekly and monthly) in Gilgit River, Pakistan. The 1D-CNN model gained incredible popularity due to its state-of-the-art performance and nominal computational complexity; while ELM model performed superfast as compared to traditional/deep learning architecture, gives comparable performance with fast execution rate. A comparative analysis is presented to assess the performance of the 1D-CNN related to the ELM model. The performance measurement matrices defined as the correlation coefficient (R-2), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) computed between the observed and predicted streamflow to evaluate the 1D-CNN and ELM model efficacy. The results indicated that the ELM model performed relatively better than the 1D-CNN model based on predefined statistical measures in three-time scale. In numerical terms, the superiority of ELM over 1D-CNN model was demonstrated by R-2 = 0.99, MAE = 18.8, RMSE = 50.14, and R-2 = 0.97, MAE = 136.59, RMSE = 230.9, for daily streamflow (testing phase) respectively. Based on our findings, it can be concluded that the ELM model would be an alternative to the 1D-CNN model for highly accurate streamflow forecasting in mountainous regions of the world.
引用
收藏
页码:915 / 927
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Modelling of runoff and sediment yield using ANN, LS-SVR, REPTree and M5 models [J].
Bharti, Birendra ;
Pandey, Ashish ;
Tripathi, S. K. ;
Kumar, Dheeraj .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2017, 48 (06) :1489-1507
[2]   Statistical downscaling of daily precipitation using support vector machines and multivariate analysis [J].
Chen, Shien-Tsung ;
Yu, Pao-Shan ;
Tang, Yi-Hsuan .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 385 (1-4) :13-22
[3]   Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using different artificial neural network algorithms [J].
Danandeh Mehr, A. ;
Kahya, E. ;
Sahin, A. ;
Nazemosadat, M. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 12 (07) :2191-2200
[4]   River flow simulation using a multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm model [J].
Darbandi, Sabereh ;
Pourhosseini, Fatemeh Akhoni .
APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2018, 8 (03)
[5]  
GAO Y, 2016, NBS P IEEE INT C ROB
[6]  
GHORBANI MA, 2016, ENVIRON EARTH SCI, V75
[7]   Mobility Prediction in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Using Extreme Learning Machines [J].
Ghouti, Lahouari ;
Sheltami, Tarek R. ;
Alutaibi, Khaled S. .
4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT 2013), THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2013), 2013, 19 :305-312
[8]   Machine Learning Models for Spring Discharge Forecasting [J].
Granata, Francesco ;
Saroli, Michele ;
de Marinis, Giovanni ;
Gargano, Rudy .
GEOFLUIDS, 2018,
[9]   Long-term time series prediction using OP-ELM [J].
Grigorievskiy, Alexander ;
Miche, Yoan ;
Ventela, Anne-Mari ;
Severin, Eric ;
Lendasse, Amaury .
NEURAL NETWORKS, 2014, 51 :50-56
[10]   Monthly streamflow forecasting based on improved support vector machine model [J].
Guo, Jun ;
Zhou, Jianzhong ;
Qin, Hui ;
Zou, Qiang ;
Li, Qingqing .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (10) :13073-13081