Design and comparison of tails for bird-scale flapping-wing robots

被引:12
作者
Guzman, M. M. [1 ]
Paez, C. Ruiz [1 ]
Maldonado, F. J. [1 ]
Zufferey, R. [1 ]
Tormo-Barbero, J. [1 ]
Acosta, J. A. [1 ]
Ollero, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, GRVC, Seville, Spain
来源
2021 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS) | 2021年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/IROS51168.2021.9635990
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Flapping-wing robots (so-called ornithopters) are a promising type of platform to perform efficient winged flight and interaction with the environment. However, the control of such vehicles is challenging due to their under-actuated morphology to meet lightweight requirements. Consequently, the flight control of flapping-wing robots is predominantly handled by the tail. Most ornithopters feature a tail with two degrees of freedom but the configuration choice is often arbitrary and without in-depth study. In this paper, we propose a thorough analysis of the design and in-flight performance for three tails. Their design and manufacturing methods are presented, with an emphasis on low weight, which is critical in ornithopters. The aerodynamics of the tails is analyzed through CFD simulations and their performance compared experimentally. The advantages and performance metrics of each configuration are discussed based on flight data. Two types of 3D flight tests were carried out: aggressive heading maneuvers and level turns. The results show that an inverted V-tail outperforms the others regarding maneuverability and stability. From the three configurations, only the inverted V-Tail can perform an aggressive stable banked level turn with a radius of 3.7 m at a turning rate of 1.6 rad/s. This research work describes the impact of the tail configuration choice on the performance of bird-scale flapping-wing robots.
引用
收藏
页码:6358 / 6365
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Bioinspired wing and tail morphing extends drone flight capabilities
    Ajanic, Enrico
    Feroskhan, Mir
    Mintchev, Stefano
    Noca, Flavio
    Floreano, Dario
    [J]. SCIENCE ROBOTICS, 2020, 5 (47)
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, THESIS
  • [3] Turbulence Models in CFD Simulation of Low-Reynolds Number Airfoils Flow
    Bogos, Stefan
    Dumitrache, Alexandru
    Frunzulica, Florin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF NUMERICAL ANALYSIS AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS 2014 (ICNAAM-2014), 2015, 1648
  • [4] Deshmukh M. S., Design and construction of an ornithopter
  • [5] Festo, SMARTB BIRD FLIGHT D
  • [6] Fitzpatrick S, 1999, J EVOLUTION BIOL, V12, P49
  • [7] Robird A Robotic Bird of Prey
    Folkertsma, Gerrit Adriaan
    Straatman, Wessel
    Nijenhuis, Nico
    Venner, Cornelis Henricus
    Stramigioli, Stefano
    [J]. IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2017, 24 (03) : 22 - 29
  • [8] Robo Raven: A Flapping-Wing Air Vehicle with Highly Compliant and Independently Controlled Wings
    Gerdes, John
    Holness, Alex
    Perez-Rosado, Ariel
    Roberts, Luke
    Greisinger, Adrian
    Barnett, Eli
    Kempny, Johannes
    Lingam, Deepak
    Yeh, Chen-Haur
    Bruck, Hugh A.
    Gupta, Satyandra K.
    [J]. SOFT ROBOTICS, 2014, 1 (04) : 275 - 288
  • [9] A novel methodology for wing sizing of bio-inspired flapping wing micro air vehicles: theory and prototype
    Hassanalian, Mostafa
    Abdelkefi, Abdessattar
    Wei, Mingjun
    Ziaei-Rad, Saeed
    [J]. ACTA MECHANICA, 2017, 228 (03) : 1097 - 1113
  • [10] Lopez-Lopez R, 2020, IEEE INT CONF ROBOT, P7008, DOI [10.1109/ICRA40945.2020.9196929, 10.1109/icra40945.2020.9196929]