Prediction of Calorific Value of Coal by Multilinear Regression and Analysis of Variance

被引:3
|
作者
Sozer, M. [1 ]
Haykiri-Acma, H. [2 ,3 ]
Yaman, S. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, MATIL Mat Testing & Innovat Labs Co, Ayazaga Campus, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Istanbul Tech Univ, Chem & Met Engn Fac, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Chem Engn, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2022年 / 144卷 / 01期
关键词
coal; multilinear regression; heating value prediction; analysis of variance; fuel combustion; HIGHER HEATING VALUE; PROXIMATE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MULTIPLE-REGRESSION; BIOMASS; NETWORK; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; PYROLYSIS; FUEL;
D O I
10.1115/1.4050880
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The higher heating value (HHV) of 84 coal samples including hard coals, lignites, and anthracites from Russia, Colombia, South Africa, Turkey, and Ukrania was predicted by multilinear regression (MLR) method based on proximate and ultimate analysis data. The prediction accuracy of the correlation equations was tested by Analysis of variance method. The significance of the predictive parameters was studied considering R-2, adj. R-2, standard error, F-values, and p-values. Although relationships between HHV and any of the single parameters were almost irregular, MLR provided a reasonable correlation. It was also found out that ultimate analysis parameters (C, H, and N) played a more significant role than the proximate analysis parameters (fixed carbon (FC), volatile matter (VM), and ash) in predicting the HHV. Particularly, FC content was seen inefficient parameter when elemental C content existed in the regression equation. The elimination of proximate analysis parameters from the equation made the elemental C content the most dominant parameter with by-far very low p-values. For hardcoals, adj. R-2 of the equation with three parameters (HHV = 87.801(C) + 132.207(H) - 77.929(S)) was slightly higher than that of HHV = 11.421(Ash) + 22.135(VM) + 19.154(FC) + 70.764(C) + 7.552(H) - 53.782(S).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of the Calorific Value of Coal Deposit Using Linear Regression Analysis
    Yerel, S.
    Ersen, T.
    ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2013, 35 (10) : 976 - 980
  • [2] Calorific Value Prediction of Coal Based on Least Squares Support Vector Regression
    Wang, Kuaini
    Zhang, Ruiting
    Li, Xujuan
    Ning, Hui
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, VOL 1, 2017, 454 : 293 - 299
  • [3] Machine learning prediction of calorific value of coal based on the hybrid analysis
    Li, Zhiqiang
    Zhao, Yuemin
    Lu, Zhaolin
    Dai, Wei
    Huang, Jinzhan
    Cui, Sen
    Chen, Biao
    Wu, Shenghong
    Dong, Liang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL PREPARATION AND UTILIZATION, 2023, 43 (03) : 577 - 598
  • [5] Prediction of gross calorific value of coal based on proximate analysis using multiple linear regression and artificial neural networks
    Acikkar, Mustafa
    Sivrikaya, Osman
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2018, 26 (05) : 2541 - 2552
  • [6] A novel approach for prediction of mass yield and higher calorific value of hydrothermal carbonization by a robust multilinear model and regression trees
    Vallejo, Fidel
    Diaz-Robles, Luis A.
    Vega, Ricardo
    Cubillos, Francisco
    JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE, 2020, 93 (04) : 1755 - 1762
  • [7] Estimation of gross calorific value of coal based on the cubist regression model
    Chen, Junlin
    He, Yuli
    Liang, Yuexia
    Wang, Wenjia
    Duan, Xiong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [8] Estimation of gross calorific value based on coal analysis using regression and artificial neural networks
    Mesroghli, Sh.
    Jorjani, E.
    Chelgani, S. Chehreh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 79 (1-2) : 49 - 54
  • [9] Comparative study of regression modeling methods for online coal calorific value prediction from flame radiation features
    Xu, Lijun
    Cheng, Yanting
    Yin, Rui
    Zhang, Qi
    FUEL, 2015, 142 : 164 - 172
  • [10] Classification of coal from proximate analysis and calorific value
    Thom, WT
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF MINING AND METALLURGICAL ENGINEERS, 1930, 88 : 406 - 408