Safety comparisons of a high-speed train's head and tail passing by a windbreak breach

被引:18
作者
Sun, Zhuang [1 ,2 ]
Hashmi, Syeda Anam [2 ]
Dai, Huanyun [1 ]
Cheng, Xiandong [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Tingting [1 ]
Chen, Zhengwei [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, State Key Lab Tract Power, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Birmingham, Sch Engn, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] China Railway Shanghai Design Inst Grp Co Ltd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Cent South Univ, Sch Traff & Transportat Engn, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Minist Educ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crosswinds; windbreak breach; derailment coefficient; multi-body simulations; AERODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE; CROSSWIND; DYNAMICS; LENGTHS;
D O I
10.1080/00423114.2020.1725067
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Field tests were carried out to measure the wheel-rail forces of a high-speed train passing by a windbreak breach with a crosswind speed and a train speed of 32 m/s and 120 km/h, respectively. Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes simulations and multibody dynamic simulations were carried out to reproduce the field test experiments. The results obtained indicated that the side force and yawing moment of the train plays a key role in the safety of the head and the tail of the train when it passes by a windbreak breach. By analysing the flow structures, the reasons behind the different aerodynamic loads on the train head and tail were discussed. Based on the vehicle movement, the maximum derailment coefficient (0.8) of the train head appeared to be at a higher risk of danger as compared to the maximum derailment coefficient (0.2) of the train tail. This is due to the wind loads on the train head which compel the bogies to relatively move with the carbody along the lateral direction one more time than the train tail. Whereas, for the train tail, there is no relative motion between the carbody and bogies on the tail.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 840
页数:18
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Comparative analysis of the effect of different nose lengths on train aerodynamic performance under crosswind
    Chen, Zhengwei
    Liu, Tanghong
    Jiang, Zhenhua
    Guo, Zijian
    Zhang, Jie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2018, 78 : 69 - 85
  • [2] *CONS T, 2002, NOTES NUMERICAL FLUI, V79
  • [3] *EN B, 140676 ENB
  • [4] AERODYNAMIC RESPONSE OF MAGLEV TRAIN MODELS TO A CROSSWIND GUST
    HOWELL, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1986, 22 (2-3) : 205 - 213
  • [5] Actively translating a rear diffuser device for the aerodynamic drag reduction of a passenger car
    Kang, S. O.
    Jun, S. O.
    Park, H. I.
    Song, K. S.
    Kee, J. D.
    Kim, K. H.
    Lee, D. H.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 13 (04) : 583 - 592
  • [6] KOBAYASHI N, 1988, SAE TECHNICAL PAPER
  • [7] Measurements of car-body lateral vibration induced by high-speed trains negotiating complex terrain sections under strong wind conditions
    Liu, Dongrun
    Lu, Zhaijun
    Zhong, Mu
    Cao, Tianpei
    Chen, Dong
    Xiong, Yupu
    [J]. VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2018, 56 (02) : 173 - 189
  • [8] A CFD analysis of the aerodynamics of a high-speed train passing through a windbreak transition under crosswind
    Liu, Tanghong
    Chen, Zhengwei
    Zhou, Xisai
    Zhang, Jie
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 12 (01) : 137 - 151
  • [9] Numerical investigation of the aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains of different lengths under crosswind with or without windbreaks
    Niu, Jiqiang
    Zhou, Dan
    Liang, Xifeng
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2017, 12 (01) : 195 - 215
  • [10] SCHULTEWERNING BMG, 1999, BE981333 EUR