The Resilience of Structure Built Around the Predicate: Homesign Gesture Systems in Turkish and American Deaf Children

被引:10
作者
Goldin-Meadow, Susan [1 ]
Namboodiripad, Savithry [1 ]
Mylander, Carolyn [1 ]
Ozyurek, Asli [2 ,3 ]
Sancar, Burcu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
LANGUAGE; COMMUNICATION; SIGN; EVENTS; MOTION; EXPRESSION; EMERGENCE; GRAMMAR; ENGLISH; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1080/15248372.2013.803970
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Deaf children whose hearing losses prevent them from accessing spoken language and whose hearing parents have not exposed them to sign language develop gesture systems, called homesigns, which have many of the properties of natural languagethe so-called resilient properties of language. We explored the resilience of structure built around the predicatein particular, how manner and path are mapped onto the verbin homesign systems developed by deaf children in Turkey and the United States. We also asked whether the Turkish homesigners exhibit sentence-level structures previously identified as resilient in American and Chinese homesigners. We found that the Turkish and American deaf children used not only the same production probability and ordering patterns to indicate who does what to whom, but also used the same segmentation and conflation patterns to package manner and path. The gestures that the hearing parents produced did not, for the most part, display the patterns found in the children's gestures. Although cospeech gesture may provide the building blocks for homesign, it does not provide the blueprint for these resilient properties of language.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 80
页数:26
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [31] Kegl J, 1999, LEARN DEV CONCEP CH, P179
  • [32] What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal?:: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking
    Kita, S
    Özyürek, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2003, 48 (01) : 16 - 32
  • [33] Cognitive systems struggling for word order
    Langus, Alan
    Nespor, Marina
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 60 (04) : 291 - 318
  • [34] Lashley K.S., 1951, CEREBRAL MECH BEHAV, P112, DOI [10.1016/j.humov.2007.04.001, DOI 10.1016/J.HUMOV.2007.04.001]
  • [35] Lillo-Martin D., 1999, HDB CHILD LANGUAGE A, P531
  • [36] Mayberry R., 1992, Handbook of neuropsychology, P51
  • [37] MEADOW KP, 1968, AM ANN DEAF, V113, P29
  • [38] THE INTERACTION OF ANIMACY AND WORD ORDER IN HUMAN LANGUAGES: A STUDY OF STRATEGIES IN A NOVEL COMMUNICATION TASK
    Meir, Irit
    Lifshitz, Adi
    Ilkbasaran, Deniz
    Padden, Carol
    [J]. EVOLUTION OF LANGUAGE, PROCEEDINGS, 2010, : 455 - +
  • [39] Naigles L. R., 1992, INT C PRAGM AUG ANTW
  • [40] Newport E.L., 1985, The cross linguistic study of language acquisition, V1