Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: Comparison between RANS and LES

被引:239
作者
Salim, Salim Mohamed [1 ]
Buccolieri, Riccardo [2 ]
Chan, Andrew [1 ]
Di Sabatino, Silvana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Environm, Fac Engn, Semenyih 43500, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Univ Salento, Dipartimento Sci Mat, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
关键词
CFD; Pollutant dispersion; Street canyon; LES; RANS; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; BOUNDARY-LAYER; SCALAR DISPERSION; WIND-TUNNEL; FLOW; MODEL; TRANSPORT; TREES; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2010.12.002
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Prediction accuracy of pollutant dispersion within an urban street canyon of width to height ratio W/H=1 is examined using two steady-state Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence closure models, the standard k-epsilon and Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) coupled with the advection-diffusion method for species transport. The numerical results, which include the statistical properties of pollutant dispersion, e.g. mean concentration distributions, time-evolution and three-dimensional spreads of the pollutant, are then compared to wind-tunnel (WT) measurements. The accuracy and computational cost of both numerical approaches are evaluated. The time-evolution of the pollutant concentration (for LES only) and the mean (time-averaged) values are presented. It is observed that amongst the two RANS models, RSM performed better than standard k-epsilon except at the centerline of the canyon walls. However, LES, although computationally more expensive, did better than RANS in predicting the concentration distribution because it was able to capture the unsteady and intermittent fluctuations of the flow field, and hence resolve the transient mixing process within the street canyon. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 113
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Wind tunnel simulation studies on dispersion at urban street canyons and intersections - a review [J].
Ahmad, K ;
Khare, M ;
Chaudhry, KK .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2005, 93 (09) :697-717
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1975, TURBULENCE
[3]   A numerical study of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in different two-dimensional street canyon configurations [J].
Assimakopoulos, VD ;
ApSimon, HM ;
Moussiopoulos, N .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 37 (29) :4037-4049
[4]  
Baik JJ, 1999, J APPL METEOROL, V38, P1576, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1576:ANSOFA>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Numerical evaluation of pollutant dispersion in the built environment: Comparisons between models and experiments [J].
Blocken, B. ;
Stathopoulos, T. ;
Saathoff, P. ;
Wang, X. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (10-11) :1817-1831
[7]   CFD evaluation of wind speed conditions in passages between parallel buildings - effect of wall-function roughness modifications for the atmospheric boundary layer flow [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Carmeliet, Jan ;
Stathopoulos, Ted .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2007, 95 (9-11) :941-962
[8]   CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Stathopoulos, Ted ;
Carmeliet, Jan .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (02) :238-252
[9]  
Britter R., 2007, Background and justification document to support the model evaluation guidance and protocol: COST action 732 Quality assurance and improvement of microscale meteorological models
[10]   Flow and dispersion in urban areas [J].
Britter, RE ;
Hanna, SR .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2003, 35 :469-496