Pressure-driven membrane processes for boron and arsenic removal: pH and synergistic effects

被引:24
作者
Regis, Aina Orell [1 ]
Vanneste, Johan [1 ]
Acker, Sarah [1 ]
Martinez, Gisella [2 ]
Ticona, Juana [2 ]
Garcia, Vilma [2 ]
Alejo, Francisco D. [2 ]
Zea, Julia [2 ]
Krahenbuhl, Richard [1 ]
Vanzin, Gary [1 ]
Sharp, Jonathan O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Ctr Min Sustainabil, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Univ Nacl San Agustin Arequipa, Ctr Mineria Sostenible, Arequipa 04000, Peru
关键词
Arsenic; Boron; pH; Nanofiltration; Reverse osmosis; REVERSE-OSMOSIS; DRINKING-WATER; NANOFILTRATION; REJECTION; TECHNOLOGY; GROUNDWATER; ION; RO;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2021.115441
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This study analyzed novel synergistic effects on rejection of arsenic and boron during membrane-based treatment. The effect of pH on rejection was characterized for pure and mixed arsenate, arsenite and borate (As(V), As (III), and B respectively) solutions. The favorable effect of high pH was strongest for B and As(III) due to the similar charge evolution in the pH 7-11 range. While only significant for arsenate, both arsenic species exhibited higher rejections when boron was present. Analysis of watersheds in southern Peru revealed a correlation between arsenic and boron; synthetic river water containing 10 mg/L B (0.97 mmol/L) and 1 mg/L As (0.013 mmol/L) was subsequently tested. Both reverse osmosis (BW30) and nanofiltration membranes (NF90) produced a system permeate that complied with the WHO standards (1 mg/L B and 0.01 mg/L As) above pH 9 in these representative, contaminated waters. The combination of increasing the pH from 7 to 9.5 and the synergistic effect doubled the allowable concentration of As(V) in the feed for BW30 from 0.5 mg/L to 1.0 mg/L. In addition to informing treatment of surface and ground waters, findings could be applied to the reuse of high pH gold cyanidation wastewaters and enhancing boron rejection during seawater desalination.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]  
Dutta T., 2012, International Journal of Engineering Research Technology, V1, P1
[22]   Performance of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for arsenic removal from drinking water [J].
Elcik, Harun ;
Celik, Suna O. ;
Cakmakci, Mehmet ;
Ozkaya, Bestamin .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (43) :20422-20429
[23]   Arsenic Rejection by Nanofiltration Membranes: Effect of Operating Parameters and Model Analysis [J].
Fang, Jun ;
Deng, Baolin .
ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2014, 31 (09) :496-506
[24]   Arsenic-contaminated groundwaters remediation by nanofiltration [J].
Figoli, A. ;
Fuoco, I ;
Apollaro, C. ;
Chabane, M. ;
Mancuso, R. ;
Gabriele, B. ;
De Rosa, R. ;
Vespasiano, G. ;
Barca, D. ;
Criscuoli, A. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 238
[25]   Influence of operating parameters on the arsenic removal by nanofiltration [J].
Figoli, Alberto ;
Cassano, Alfredo ;
Criscuoli, Alessandra ;
Mozumder, M. Salatul Islam ;
Uddin, M. Tamez ;
Islam, M. Akhtarul ;
Drioli, Enrico .
WATER RESEARCH, 2010, 44 (01) :97-104
[26]   Technology alternatives for decontamination of arsenic-rich groundwater-A critical review [J].
Ghosh , Sudipta ;
Debsarkar, Anupam ;
Dutta, Amit .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2019, 13 :277-303
[27]   Arsenic removal from drinking water using low-pressure nanofiltration under various operating conditions [J].
Harfoush, M. ;
Mirbagheri, S. A. ;
Ehteshami, M. ;
Nejati, S. .
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 (02) :295-302
[28]   Assessing the current state of commercially available membranes and spacers for energy production with pressure retarded osmosis [J].
Hickenbottom, Kerri L. ;
Vanneste, Johan ;
Elimelech, Menachem ;
Cath, Tzahi Y. .
DESALINATION, 2016, 389 :108-118
[29]  
Hoffman J.I.E., 2019, Basic biostatistics for medical and biomedical practitioners, P341, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-817084-7.00022-X, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-817084-7.00022-X]
[30]  
Hou Y., 2009, IMPROVED METHOD ARSE, P71