A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership

被引:19
作者
Cadel, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Marcinow, Michelle [1 ]
Sandercock, Jane [1 ]
Dowedoff, Penny [1 ]
Guilcher, Sara J. T. [2 ,3 ]
Maybee, Alies [4 ]
Law, Susan [1 ,3 ]
Kuluski, Kerry [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Trillium Hlth Partners, Inst Better Hlth, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Leslie & Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Patient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
CARE; HEALTH; TELEHEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257880
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic? Objective To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic. Methods The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted. Results Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement. Conclusions Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
[41]  
Kirkup K., 2020, The Globe and Mail
[42]  
Kreimer S, 2020, NEUROLOGY TODAY, V20, P1, DOI [10.1097/01.NT.0000672408.48923.f9, DOI 10.1097/01.NT.0000672408.48923.F9]
[43]   To Tweet or Not to Tweet-a Review of the Viral Power of Twitter for Infectious Diseases [J].
Kullar, Ravina ;
Goff, Debra A. ;
Gauthier, Timothy P. ;
Smith, Tara C. .
CURRENT INFECTIOUS DISEASE REPORTS, 2020, 22 (06)
[44]  
Kuluski Kerry, 2017, Healthc Pap, V17, P8, DOI 10.12927/hcpap.2017.25415
[45]   Scoping studies: advancing the methodology [J].
Levac, Danielle ;
Colquhoun, Heather ;
O'Brien, Kelly K. .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2010, 5
[46]  
Medical Library Association, 2020, COVID-19 Literature Searches
[47]  
Medina Michelle, 2020, Cleve Clin J Med, DOI 10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc028
[48]  
Meinert Edward, 2020, JMIR Public Health Surveill, V6, pe19297, DOI 10.2196/19297
[49]   Palliative Care in the Time of COVID-19 [J].
Mercadante, Sebastiano ;
Adile, Claudio ;
Ferrera, Patrizia ;
Giuliana, Fausto ;
Terruso, Lidia ;
Piccione, Tania .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2020, 60 (02) :E79-E80
[50]   COVID-19, Telemedicine, and Patient Empowerment in HIV Care and Research [J].
Mgbako, Ofole ;
Miller, Emily H. ;
Santoro, Anthony F. ;
Remien, Robert H. ;
Shalev, Noga ;
Olender, Susan ;
Gordon, Peter ;
Sobieszczyk, Magda E. .
AIDS AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 24 (07) :1990-1993