A scoping review of patient engagement activities during COVID-19: More consultation, less partnership

被引:19
作者
Cadel, Lauren [1 ,2 ]
Marcinow, Michelle [1 ]
Sandercock, Jane [1 ]
Dowedoff, Penny [1 ]
Guilcher, Sara J. T. [2 ,3 ]
Maybee, Alies [4 ]
Law, Susan [1 ,3 ]
Kuluski, Kerry [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Trillium Hlth Partners, Inst Better Hlth, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Leslie & Fac Pharm, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Patient Partner, Toronto, ON, Canada
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 09期
关键词
CARE; HEALTH; TELEHEALTH;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0257880
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on healthcare systems and care delivery, changing the context for patient and family engagement activities. Given the critical contribution of such activities in achieving health system quality goals, we undertook to address the question: What is known about work that has been done on patient engagement activities during the pandemic? Objective To examine peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify the range of patient engagement activities, broadly defined (inclusive of engagement to support clinical care to partnerships in decision-making), occurring within health systems internationally during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as key barriers and facilitators for sustaining patient engagement activities during the pandemic. Methods The following databases were searched: Medline, Embase and LitCOVID; a search for grey literature focused on the websites of professional organizations. Articles were required to be specific to COVID-19, describe patient engagement activities, involve a healthcare organization and be published from March 2020 to September 2020. Data were extracted and managed using Microsoft Excel. A content analysis of findings was conducted. Results Twenty-nine articles were included. Few examples of more genuine partnership with patients were identified (such as co-design and organizational level decision making); most activities related to clinical level interactions (e.g. virtual consultations, remote appointments, family visits using technology and community outreach). Technology was leveraged in almost all reported studies to interact or connect with patients and families. Five main descriptive categories were identified: (1) Engagement through Virtual Care; (2) Engagement through Other Technology; (3) Engagement for Service Improvements/ Recommendations; (4) Factors Impacting Patient Engagement; and (5) Lessons Learned though Patient Engagement. Conclusions Evidence of how healthcare systems and organizations stayed connected to patients and families during the pandemic was identified; the majority of activities involved direct care consultations via technology. Since this review was conducted over the first six months of the pandemic, more work is needed to unpack the spectrum of patient engagement activities, including how they may evolve over time and to explore the barriers and facilitators for sustaining activities during major disruptions like pandemics.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management
    Amiri, M.
    Hashemi-Tabatabaei, M.
    Ghahremanloo, M.
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M.
    Zavadskas, E. K.
    Banaitis, A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 125 - 142
  • [2] Rapid implementation of a COVID-19 remote patient monitoring program
    Annis, Tucker
    Pleasants, Susan
    Hultman, Gretchen
    Lindemann, Elizabeth
    Thompson, Joshua A.
    Billecke, Stephanie
    Badlani, Sameer
    Melton, Genevieve B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (08) : 1326 - 1330
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Patient engagement: technical series on safer primary care
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2020, BBC News
  • [5] Azevedo J.P., 2020, SIMULATING POTENTIAL
  • [6] Product Review: Covidence (Systematic Review Software)
    Babineau, Jessica
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN HEALTH LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION, 2014, 35 (02): : 68 - 71
  • [7] Baker G R., 2016, Patient Engagement: Catalyzing Improvement and Innovation in Healthcare, P11
  • [8] Becker E., 2020, How hard will the coronavirus hit the travel industry?
  • [9] The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Nolan, Thomas W.
    Whittington, John
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) : 759 - 769
  • [10] Change From the Inside Out Health Care Leaders Taking the Helm
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Feeley, Derek
    Loehrer, Saranya
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (17): : 1707 - 1708