Estimated carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity has similar predictive value as measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity

被引:140
|
作者
Greve, Sara V. [1 ]
Blicher, Marie K. [1 ]
Kruger, Ruan [2 ]
Sehestedt, Thomas [3 ]
Gram-Kampmann, Eva [1 ]
Rasmussen, Susanne [4 ]
Vishram, Julie K. K. [5 ,6 ]
Boutouyrie, Pierre [7 ]
Laurent, Stephane [7 ]
Olsen, Michael H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol, Cardiovasc & Metab Prevent Clin, Klovervaenget 10,6 Sal, DK-5000 Odense C, Denmark
[2] North West Univ, HART, Potchefstroom, South Africa
[3] Bispebjerg Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Diagnost Imaging, Hellerup, Denmark
[5] Glostrup Univ Hosp, Res Ctr Prevent & Hlth, Glostrup, Denmark
[6] Gentofte Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Glostrup, Denmark
[7] Hop Europeen Georges Pompidou, Paris Cardiovasc Res Ctr PARCC, Team 7, INSERM,U970, Paris, France
关键词
arterial stiffness; cardiovascular risk; prevention; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR; AORTIC STIFFNESS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; ALL-CAUSE; RISK; MORTALITY; ARTERIAL; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0000000000000935
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) adds significantly to traditional cardiovascular risk prediction, but is not widely available. Therefore, it would be helpful if cfPWV could be replaced by an estimated carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (ePWV) using age and mean blood pressure, and previously published equations. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ePWV could predict cardiovascular events independently of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and/or cfPWV. Method: cfPWV was measured and ePWV was calculated in 2366 patients from four age groups of the Danish MONICA10 cohort. Additionally, the patients were divided into four cardiovascular risk groups based on Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) or Framingham risk score (FRS). In 2006, the combined cardiovascular endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke and hospitalization for ischemic heart disease was registered. Results: Most results were retested in 1045 hypertensive patients from a Paris cohort. Bland-Altman plot demonstrated a relative difference of -0.3% [ 95% confidence interval (CI) -15 to 17%] between ePWV and cfPWV. In Cox regression models in apparently healthy patients, ePWV and cfPWV (per SD) added independently to SCORE in prediction of combined endpoint [ hazard ratio (95% CI) = 1.38(1.09-1.76) and hazard ratio (95% CI) = 1.18(1.01-1.38)] and to FRS [ hazard ratio (95% CI) = 1.33(1.06-1.66) and hazard ratio (95% CI) = 1.16(0.99-1.37)]. If healthy patients with ePWV and/or cfPWV at least 10 m/s were reclassified to a higher SCORE risk category, net reclassification index was 10.8%, P less than 0.01. These results were reproduced in the Paris cohort. Conclusion: ePWV predicted major cardiovascular events independently of SCORE, FRS and cfPWV indicating that these traditional risk scores have underestimated the complicated impact of age and blood pressure on arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk.
引用
收藏
页码:1279 / 1289
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Association of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity and Ejection Duration with Target Organ Damage
    Bai, Yaya
    Jia, Huiying
    Avolio, Alberto
    Qian, Yi
    Zuo, Junli
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (02)
  • [22] Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in Healthy Spanish Children: Reference Percentile Curves
    Mora-Urda, Ana I.
    Molina, Maria del Carmen B.
    Mill, Jose G.
    Montero-Lopez, Pilar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2017, 19 (03): : 227 - 234
  • [23] Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Is Associated With Cerebral White Matter Lesions in Type 2 Diabetes
    Laugesen, Esben
    Hoyem, Pernille
    Stausbol-Gron, Brian
    Mikkelsen, Anders
    Thrysoe, Samuel
    Erlandsen, Mogens
    Christiansen, Jens S.
    Knudsen, Soren T.
    Hansen, Klavs W.
    Kim, Won Y.
    Hansen, Troels K.
    Poulsen, Per L.
    DIABETES CARE, 2013, 36 (03) : 722 - 728
  • [24] Outcome Associations of Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Vary With Different Measurement Methods
    Girerd, Nicolas
    Legedz, Liliana
    Paget, Vinciane
    Rabilloud, Muriel
    Milon, Hugues
    Bricca, Giampiero
    Lantelme, Pierre
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2012, 25 (12) : 1264 - 1270
  • [25] Measures of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index are not reliable in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm
    Lee, Ching Wei
    Sung, Shih Hsien
    Chen, Chun Ku
    Chen, I. Ming
    Cheng, Hao Min
    Yu, Wen Chung
    Shih, Chun Che
    Chen, Chen Huan
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2013, 31 (09) : 1853 - 1860
  • [26] Cardio-ankle vascular index and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: limits and strengths
    Grillo, Andrea
    Salvi, Paolo
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 (04) : 759 - 764
  • [27] Associations between estimated and measured carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in older Black and White adults: the atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study
    Heffernan, Kevin
    Stoner, Lee
    Meyer, Michelle L.
    Keifer, Adam
    Bates, Lauren
    Lassalle, Patricia Pagan
    Hanson, Erik D.
    Horiuchi, Masahiro
    Michos, Erin D.
    Kucharska-Newton, Anna
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    Hughes, Timothy M.
    Tanaka, Hirofumi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR AGING, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [28] Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is a marker of severity in septic shock patients
    Laviolle, B.
    Uhel, F.
    Seguin, P.
    Bellissant, E.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 28 : 33 - 33
  • [29] Hyperleptinemia is an Independent Predictor for Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in Elderly People
    Yeh, Ying-Ting
    Li, Pei-Chen
    Wang, Ji-Hung
    Lee, Chung-Jen
    Wang, Chih-Hsien
    Hsu, Bang-Gee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGY, 2020, 14 (01) : 6 - 10
  • [30] Carotid-Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity in the Prediction of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhong, Qi
    Hu, Ming-Jun
    Cui, Yan-Jie
    Liang, Ling
    Zhou, Meng-Meng
    Yang, Yu-Wei
    Huang, Fen
    ANGIOLOGY, 2018, 69 (07) : 617 - 629