Investigating prompts for supporting students' self-regulation - A remaining challenge for learning analytics approaches*

被引:53
作者
Schumacher, Clara [1 ]
Ifenthaler, Dirk [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Unter Linden 6, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Learning Design & Technol, L 4,1, D-68161 Mannheim, Germany
[3] Curtin Univ, UNESCO Deputy Chair Data Sci Higher Educ Learning, Kent St, Bentley, WA, Australia
关键词
Prompting; Self-regulated learning; Higher education; Learning analytics; EDUCATIONAL DATA; CLASSROOM; NUMBERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.iheduc.2020.100791
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
To perform successfully in higher education learners are considered to engage in self-regulation. Prompts in digital learning environments aim at activating self-regulation strategies that learners know but do not spontaneously show. To investigate such interventions learning analytics approaches can be applied. This quasi experimental study (N = 110) investigates whether different prompts based on theory of self-regulated learning (e.g., cognitive, metacognitive, motivational) impact declarative knowledge and transfer, perceptions as well as online learning behavior, and whether trace data can inform learning performance. Findings indicate small effects of prompts supporting the performance in a declarative knowledge and transfer test. In addition, the prompted groups showed different online learning behavior than the control group. However, trace data in this study were not capable of sufficiently explaining learning performance in a transfer test. Future research is required to investigate adaptive prompts using trace data in authentic learning settings as well as focusing on learners? reactions to distinct prompts.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[11]  
Boekaerts M., 1999, INT J EDUC RES, V31, P445, DOI [10.1016/S0883-0355, DOI 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2, 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00014-2]
[12]   Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review [J].
Broadbent, J. ;
Poon, W. L. .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2015, 27 :1-13
[14]   An overview of learning analytics [J].
Clow, Doug .
TEACHING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 18 (06) :683-695
[15]  
Corrin L., 2014, P ASCILITE DUNEDIN 2, P629, DOI DOI 10.1145/2723576.2723662
[16]   Evaluating the effectiveness of educational data mining techniques for early prediction of students' academic failure in introductory programming courses [J].
Costa, Evandro B. ;
Fonseca, Baldoino ;
Santana, Marcelo Almeida ;
de Araujo, Fabrisia Ferreira ;
Rego, Joilson .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2017, 73 :247-256
[17]   Supporting Self-Regulated Learning With Digital Media Using Motivational Regulation and Metacognitive Prompts [J].
Daumiller, Martin ;
Dresel, Markus .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2019, 87 (01) :161-176
[18]  
Drachsler H., 2012, Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, V4, P1743, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_347, 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6]
[19]  
El-Rady A. A., 2017, P INT C ADV INT SYST, V533, P660
[20]   Analyzing temporal data for understanding the learning process induced by metacognitive prompts [J].
Engelmann, Katharina ;
Bannert, Maria .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2021, 72