Industry 4.0 Readiness Assessment Method Based on RAMI 4.0 Standards

被引:22
作者
Bastos, Alan [1 ]
Sguario Coelho De Andrade, Mauren Louise [1 ]
Yoshino, Rui Tadashi [2 ]
Dias Santos, Max Mauro [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana Ponta Grossa, Dept Informat, BR-84016210 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[2] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana Ponta Grossa, Dept Engn Prod, BR-84016210 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
[3] Univ Tecnol Fed Parana Ponta Grossa, Dept Eletron, BR-84016210 Ponta Grossa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Libraries; Licenses; Cyber-physical systems; Search problems; Search engines; Industries; Cloud computing; Industry; 4; 0; Rami; readiness evaluation method; industrial cyber-physical systems; readiness level assessment; MATURITY MODEL; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105456
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Industry 4.0 concept inception definitively provided a disruptive glimpse in terms of possibilities in a multidisciplinary spectrum. The convergence and synergy from technologies generated quite high expectations. In terms of advancements, the efficiency increase is one of the key factors. Smart factories must be capable of producing more and in an ecologically cleaner manner, by benefiting from less environmentally impacting energy sources. The present moment is for digital transformation in the diverse enabling transverse areas. For that to be feasible, the next steps are towards standardization, which brings viability to expand and integrate the assorted devices and processes, bringing intelligence closer to all the involved equipment by capitalization. The gap that this research aims to explore is in the assessment of the ongoing industries, focusing on the current status of the operational plants technologically. In other words, by mapping the present, as-is, situation, the stakeholders obtain a valuable guidance resource to go through the journey upon permeating the Industry 4.0 status, the greater objective. Undoubtedly, a path of considerable length, but with well-proportioned outcomes. The solution's ambition is to rate, grade, and calculate the readiness and maturity levels of the institution accordingly to that scope. To achieve that, methods will be developed and applied to gather information and subsequently threaten it. Finally, the results will be confronted versus the fourth industrial revolution preconized capabilities, as defined by the Rami 4.0 Reference Architecture Model. Having presented the information, there is a possibility to establish a road-map to achieve the desired level.
引用
收藏
页码:119778 / 119799
页数:22
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   How do startups develop Internet-of-things systems A multiple exploratory case study [J].
Anh Nguyen Duc ;
Khalid, Khan ;
Lonnestad, Tor ;
Shahid, Sohaib Bajwa ;
Wang, Xiaofeng ;
Abrahamsson, Pekka .
2019 IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE AND SYSTEM PROCESSES (ICSSP 2019), 2019, :74-83
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ECLASS ECLASS STANDA
[3]   A Knowledge Graph for Industry 4.0 [J].
Bader, Sebastian R. ;
Grangel-Gonzalez, Irlan ;
Nanjappa, Priyanka ;
Vidal, Maria-Esther ;
Maleshkova, Maria .
SEMANTIC WEB (ESWC 2020), 2020, 12123 :465-480
[4]   Production Assessment 4.0-Methods for the Development and Evaluation of Industry 4.0 Use Cases [J].
Bauer, Wilhelm ;
Pokorni, Bastian ;
Findeisen, Stefanie .
ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING, PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT AND PROCESS CONTROL, 2019, 793 :501-510
[5]   The industrial internet of things (IIoT): An analysis framework [J].
Boyes, Hugh ;
Hallaq, Bit ;
Cunningham, Joe ;
Watson, Tim .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2018, 101 :1-12
[6]   Industrial smart and micro grid systems - A systematic mapping study [J].
Brem, Alexander ;
Adrita, Mumtahina Mahajabin ;
O'Sullivan, Dominic T. J. ;
Bruton, Ken .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244
[7]  
Castelluccia D., 2017, ACM SIGSOFT SOFTW EN, V41, P1, DOI [10.1145/3011286.3011307, DOI 10.1145/3011286.3011307]
[8]   A maturity assessment approach for conceiving context-specific roadmaps in the Industry 4.0 era [J].
Colli, M. ;
Berger, U. ;
Bockholt, M. ;
Madsen, O. ;
Moller, C. ;
Waehrens, B. Vejrum .
ANNUAL REVIEWS IN CONTROL, 2019, 48 :165-177
[9]   Cybersecurity in the context of industry 4.0: A structured classification of critical assets and business impacts [J].
Corallo, Angelo ;
Lazoi, Mariangela ;
Lezzi, Marianna .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2020, 114
[10]   Semantic Interoperability in IoT: A Systematic Mapping [J].
de Souza, Saymon Castro ;
Pereira Filho, Jose Goncalves .
INTERNET OF THINGS, SMART SPACES, AND NEXT GENERATION NETWORKS AND SYSTEMS, NEW2AN 2019, RUSMART 2019, 2019, 11660 :53-64