Microbiological recovery from bovine, swine, equine, and ovine carcasses: Comparison of excision, sponge and swab sampling methods

被引:12
作者
Gallina, Silvia [1 ]
Bianchi, Daniela Manila [1 ]
Ru, Giuseppe [1 ]
Maurella, Cristiana [1 ]
Barzanti, Paola [1 ]
Baioni, Elisa [1 ]
Virgilio, Sebastiano [2 ]
Mioni, Renzo [3 ]
Lanni, Luigi [4 ]
Migliazzo, Aldo [5 ]
Losio, Marina Nadia [6 ]
Bove, Daniela [7 ]
Scuota, Stefania [8 ]
Goffredo, Elisabetta [9 ]
Decastelli, Lucia [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Piemonte Liguria &, Lab Control Alimenti, I-10154 Turin, TO, Italy
[2] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Sardegna, I-07100 Sassari, Italy
[3] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Venezie, I-35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy
[4] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lazio & Toscana, I-00178 Rome, Italy
[5] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Sicilia, I-90129 Palermo, Italy
[6] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Lombardia & Emilia, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[7] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Mezzogiorno, I-80055 Portici, Italy
[8] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Umbria & Marche, I-06126 Perugia, Italy
[9] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Puglia & Basilicata, I-71100 Foggia, Italy
关键词
Regulation (EC) no 2073/2005; Process hygiene criteria; Carcass; Sampling method; Swab; Excision; RED MEAT; LAMB CARCASSES; BEEF; SURFACES; CONTAMINATION; GAUZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.10.052
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Legislation introduced under European Commission Regulation (EC) n degrees 2073/2005 and later amendments (Reg. 1441/2007/EC, Reg. 365/2010/EC, Reg. 1089/2011/EC, Reg. 209/2013/EC) mandates that food business operators carry out microbiological analyses on meat carcass surfaces after slaughter procedures as part of hygiene monitoring of production. Besides setting forth general rules for sampling and sample preparation, Regulation EC 2073/2005 requires that operators comply with ISO 17604, which lists destructive and non-destructive sampling methods, selection of sampling sites, and rules for sample storage and transport. This study compares the effectiveness of destructive (excision) and non-destructive (sponge and wet-dry swabbing) methods for the recovery of total viable count (TVC) and Enterobacteriaceae on carcass surfaces. To do this, we pooled samples collected from carcasses of four animal species (cattle, n = 120; pigs, n = 130; horses, n = 84; and small ruminants [sheep and goats], n = 121). TVC and Enterobacteriaceae were enumerated and compared for each sampling method. Microbiological analyses were performed according to ISO 4833:2003 for TVC and ISO 21528:2004 for Enterobacteriaceae. The effectiveness of the sampling methods was analyzed by comparing the differences between the median of colony forming units per square centimeter (CFU/cm(2)) for TVC and Enterobacteriaceae recovered by each method. Non-parametric analysis of variance for repeated measures was applied for each species separately. Excision was the most effective method. The relationship between the CFU recovered by swabbing, by sponge, and by excision, for all species, was generally better than 1:5. This is in contrast with the Italian Ministry of Health Memorandum (23 December 2002), which states that non-destructive methods recover 20% of the destructive method. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:919 / 924
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Excision vs sponge swabbing - a comparison of methods for the microbiological sampling of beef, pork and lamb carcasses
    Pearce, RA
    Bolton, DJ
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 98 (04) : 896 - 900
  • [2] Microbiological Sampling of Carcasses by Excision or Swabbing with Three Types of Sponge or Gauze
    Martinez, Bernardo
    Felicidad Celda, M.
    Anastasio, Begona
    Garcia, Ines
    Carmen Lopez-Mendoza, M.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2010, 73 (01) : 81 - 87
  • [3] COMPARISON OF EXCISION, SWABBING AND RINSING SAMPLING METHODS TO DETERMINE THE MICROBIOLOGICAL QUALITY OF BROILER CARCASSES
    Zhang, Qiu Qin
    Ye, Ke Ping
    Xu, Xing Lian
    Zhou, Guang Hong
    Cao, Jin Xuan
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SAFETY, 2012, 32 (01) : 134 - 139
  • [4] Comparison of four sampling methods for microbiological quantification on broiler carcasses
    Gravning, Gunvor Elise Nagel
    Rotterud, Ole-Johan
    Bjorkoy, Solfrid
    Forseth, Merete
    Skjerve, Eystein
    Llarena, Ann-Katrin
    Lian, Astrid
    Johannessen, Gro S.
    Hauge, Sigrun J.
    FOOD CONTROL, 2021, 121
  • [5] Sampling by Sponge Wipe or Skin Excision for Recovery of Inoculated Salmonella and Campylobacter from Defeathered Broiler Carcasses
    Berrang, Mark E.
    Cox, Nelson A.
    Oakley, Brian B.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (05) : 824 - 827
  • [6] Comparison of Swab Sampling Methods for Norovirus Recovery on Surfaces
    Lee, Cheonghoon
    Park, SungJun
    Cho, Kyuseon
    Yoo, Ju Eun
    Lee, Sunghee
    Ko, GwangPyo
    FOOD AND ENVIRONMENTAL VIROLOGY, 2018, 10 (04) : 378 - 385
  • [7] Assessment of the microbiological conditions of red-meat carcasses from bacterial counts recovered by sampling via excision or swabbing with cotton wool
    Martinez, Bernardo
    Felicidad Celda, Maria
    Encarnacion Millan, Maria
    Espacio, Aurora
    Cano, Monserrat
    Lopez-Mendoza, Maria Carmen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 44 (04) : 770 - 776
  • [8] Comparison of Neck Skin Excision and Whole Carcass Rinse Sampling Methods for Microbiological Evaluation of Broiler Carcasses before and after Immersion Chilling
    Cox, N. A.
    Richardson, L. J.
    Cason, J. A.
    Buhr, R. J.
    Vizzier-Thaxton, Y.
    Smith, D. P.
    Fedorka-Cray, P. J.
    Romanenghi, C. P.
    Pereira, L. V. B.
    Doyle, M. P.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2010, 73 (05) : 976 - 980
  • [9] The Swab, the Drip, or the Meat? Comparison of Microbiological Sampling Methods in Vacuum-Packed Raw Beef
    Martinez-Moreno, Aracely
    Chavez-Martinez, America
    Corry, Janet E.
    Helps, Christopher R.
    Reyes-Villagrana, Raul. A.
    Gallegos, Juan. M. Tirado
    Santellano-Estrada, Eduardo
    Renteria-Monterrubio, Ana L.
    MICROORGANISMS, 2025, 13 (01)
  • [10] Comparison of the performance of the biofilm sampling methods (swab, sponge, contact agar) in the recovery of Listeria monocytogenes populations considering the seafood environment conditions
    Faille, Christine
    Brauge, Thomas
    Leleu, Guylaine
    Hanin, Aurelie
    Denis, Catherine
    Midelet, Graziella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 325