Large-scale distribution modelling and the utility of detailed ground data

被引:1
|
作者
Watson, FGR [1 ]
Grayson, RB [1 ]
Vertessy, RA [1 ]
McMahon, TA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cooperat Res Ctr Catchment Hydrol, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
forest hydrology; distribution function modelling; parameterization; uncertainty; precipitation; leaf area index (LAI); topography; digital elevation models (DEM); Macaque;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199805)12:6<873::AID-HYP660>3.0.CO;2-A
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
A large-scale distribution function model was used to investigate the effect of differing parameter mapping schemes on the quality of hydrological predictions. Precipitation was mapped over a large forested catchment area (163 km(2)) using both one-dimensional linear and three-dimensional non-linear interpolation schemes. Lumped stream flow predictions were found to be particularly sensitive to the different precipitation maps, with the three-dimensional map predicting 12% higher mean annual precipitation, resulting in 36% higher modelled stream flow over a three-year period. However, spatial predictions of stream flow appeared worse when derived from the three-dimensional map, which is considered the better of the two precipitation maps. This implies uncertainty in either the model's response to precipitation or the precipitation mapping process (the 12% precipitation difference was strongly determined by a single, short term gauge). Leaf area index (LAI) was mapped using both remote sensing and species based methods. The two LAI maps had similar lumped mean values but exhibited significant spatial differences. The resulting lumped predictions of stream flow did not vary. This suggests a linear response of water balance to LAI in the non-water-limited conditions of the study area, and de-emphasizes the importance of quantifying relative spatial variations in LAI. Topographic maps were created for a small experimental subcatchment(15 ha) using both air photographic interpretation and ground survey. The two maps differed markedly and lead to significantly different spatial predictions of runoff generation, but nearly identical predicted hydrographs. Thus, at scales of small basins, accurate topographic mapping is suggested to be of little importance in distribution function modelling because models are unable to make use of complex spatial data. Predictions of water yield can be very sensitive (in the case of precipitation) or insensitive (in the case of small-scale topography) to changes in spatial parameterization. In either case, increased complexity in spatial parameterization does not necessarily result in better, or more certain prediction of hydrological response. (C) 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 888
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disinformative data in large-scale hydrological modelling
    Kauffeldt, A.
    Halldin, S.
    Rodhe, A.
    Xu, C. -Y.
    Westerberg, I. K.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 17 (07) : 2845 - 2857
  • [2] Evaluation of large-scale precipitation data sets for water resources modelling in Central Asia
    Marcus Malsy
    Tim aus der Beek
    Martina Flörke
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73 : 787 - 799
  • [3] Evaluation of large-scale precipitation data sets for water resources modelling in Central Asia
    Malsy, Marcus
    Beek, Tim Aus Der
    Floerke, Martina
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 73 (02) : 787 - 799
  • [4] Scalable Algorithms for Bayesian Inference of Large-Scale Models from Large-Scale Data
    Ghattas, Omar
    Isaac, Tobin
    Petra, Noemi
    Stadler, Georg
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING FOR COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE - VECPAR 2016, 2017, 10150 : 3 - 6
  • [5] The utility of daily large-scale climate data in the assessment of climate change impacts on daily streamflow in California
    Maurer, E. P.
    Hidalgo, H. G.
    Das, T.
    Dettinger, M. D.
    Cayan, D. R.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (06) : 1125 - 1138
  • [6] Large-Scale Hydrological Modelling of the Upper Parana River Basin
    Abou Rafee, Sameh A.
    Uvo, Cintia B.
    Martins, Jorge A.
    Domingues, Leonardo M.
    Rudke, Anderson P.
    Fujita, Thais
    Freitas, Edmilson D.
    WATER, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [7] CoDDA: A Flexible Copula-based Distribution Driven Analysis Framework for Large-Scale Multivariate Data
    Hazarika, Subhashis
    Dutta, Soumya
    Shen, Han-Wei
    Chen, Jen-Ping
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VISUALIZATION AND COMPUTER GRAPHICS, 2019, 25 (01) : 1214 - 1224
  • [8] Anthropogenic aerosols and the distribution of past large-scale precipitation change
    Wang, Chien
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2015, 42 (24) : 10876 - 10884
  • [9] Quantifying large-scale ecosystem stability with remote sensing data
    White, Hannah J.
    Gaul, Willson
    Sadykova, Dinara
    Leon-Sanchez, Lupe
    Caplat, Paul
    Emmerson, Mark C.
    Yearsley, Jon M.
    REMOTE SENSING IN ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 6 (03) : 354 - 365
  • [10] Development of a coupled soil erosion and large-scale hydrology modeling system
    Mao, Dazhi
    Cherkauer, Keith A.
    Flanagan, Dennis C.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46