Complications of Renal Cryoablation: A Single Center Experience

被引:39
作者
Sidana, Abhinav
Aggarwal, Piyush
Feng, Zhaoyong
Georgiades, Christos S. [2 ]
Trock, Bruce J.
Rodriguez, Ronald [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Sch Med, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
kidney; kidney neoplasms; cryosurgery; complications; risk; NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY; CELL CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC CRYOABLATION; PERCUTANEOUS CRYOABLATION; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; MASSES; TUMORS; CRYOSURGERY; CRYOINJURY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.013
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We describe perioperative complications associated with renal cryoablation and identify potential risk factors for certain complications. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with unifocal renal masses treated with cryosurgery at a single center between 1997 and 2007. All complications associated with these procedures were documented and classified into grades 1 to 5 by the Clavien surgical complication classification. In-depth analysis was done to identify potential risk factors for the most common complications. Results: We evaluated 101 percutaneous, 52 laparoscopic and 9 open procedures. Complications were noted in 38 procedures (23.5%), including grades 1 to 4 in 19 (11.7%), 8 (4.9%), 5 (3.1%) and 6 (3.7%), respectively, as the severest complication. The most common complication was flank pain (11 procedures), followed by perinephric hematoma and cardiovascular complications (10 each). Mass size (p = 0.001), number of cryoablation probes (p <0.001) and chronic anticoagulation (p <0.05) were associated with an increased incidence of significant hematoma. Cardiovascular complications were more common when upper pole lesions were treated, and when an open approach was used (each p <0.05). Respiratory complications occurred in 7 procedures and were associated with patient age (p <0.05) and mass size (p <0.01). Conclusions: Cryoablation is a relatively safe procedure with a low complications rate in properly selected patients. We identified potential risk factors that may help identify patients most at risk for certain complications and consequently assist in preprocedural planning and counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 47
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RENAL Nephrometry Score Is Associated With Complications After Renal Cryoablation: A Multicenter Analysis
    Sisul, David M.
    Liss, Michael A.
    Palazzi, Kerrin L.
    Briles, Kaitlan
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Gold, Robert E.
    Masterson, James H.
    Mirheydar, Hossein S.
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Stroup, Sean P.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Wake, Robert W.
    Rivera-Sanfeliz, Gerant
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (04) : 775 - 780
  • [32] Incidence of Hypercoagulable Events after Image-Guided Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tumors: A Single-Center Experience
    Hartman, Jason B.
    Bhojwani, Nicholas
    Corn, David J.
    Cooney, Matthew M.
    Haaga, John
    Ponsky, Lee
    Abouassaly, Robert
    Paspulati, Akshay
    Prologo, J. David
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (05) : 776 - 779
  • [33] Radiofrequency Ablation, Cryoablation, and Microwave Ablation for the Treatment of Small Renal Masses: Efficacy and Complications
    Bertolotti, Lorenzo
    Bazzocchi, Maria Vittoria
    Iemma, Enrico
    Pagnini, Francesco
    Ziglioli, Francesco
    Maestroni, Umberto
    Patera, Annalisa
    Natale, Matteo Pio
    Martini, Chiara
    De Filippo, Massimo
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [34] Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation
    Schiffman, Marc
    Moshfegh, Amiel
    Talenfeld, Adam
    Del Pizzo, Joseph J.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 31 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [35] Computed Tomography Perfusion, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Histopathological Findings After Laparoscopic Renal Cryoablation: An In Vivo Pig Model
    Nielsen, Tommy Kjaergaard
    Ostraat, Oyvind
    Graumann, Ole
    Pedersen, Bodil Ginnerup
    Andersen, Gratien
    Hoyer, Soren
    Borre, Michael
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2017, 16 (04) : 406 - 413
  • [36] Renal cryoablation: Multidisciplinary, collaborative and perspective approach
    Ismail, Mohamed
    Nielsen, Tommy Kjaergaard
    Lagerveld, Brunolf
    Garnon, Julien
    Breen, David
    King, Alexander
    van Strijen, Marco
    Keeley, Francis X., Jr.
    CRYOBIOLOGY, 2018, 83 : 90 - 94
  • [37] Renal Cryoablation Versus Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Washington University Long-Term Experience
    Tanagho, Youssef S.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Kim, Eric H.
    Figenshau, R. Sherburne
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2013, 27 (12) : 1477 - 1486
  • [38] Laparoscopic vs Percutaneous Cryoablation for the Small Renal Mass: 15-Year Experience at a Single Center
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Samarasekera, Dinesh
    Khalifeh, Ali
    Remer, Erick M.
    O'Malley, Charles
    Akca, Oktay
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Kaouk, Jihad H.
    UROLOGY, 2015, 85 (04) : 850 - 855
  • [39] Complications of CAPD: a Single Center Experience
    Al Wakeel, Jamal S.
    Mitwalli, Ahmed H.
    Tarif, Nauman
    Hammad, Durdana
    Abu-Aisha, Hassan
    Memon, Nawaz
    Alam, Awatif
    Suliman, Fathia
    Askar, Akram
    Qudsi, Abdo
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES AND TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 16 (01) : 29 - 32
  • [40] Percutaneous Microwave Ablation versus Cryoablation for Small Renal Masses (≤4 cm): 12-Year Experience at a Single Center
    Sun, George
    Eisenbrey, John R.
    Smolock, Amanda R.
    Lallas, Costas D.
    Anton, Kevin F.
    Adamo, Robert D.
    Shaw, Colette M.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (06) : 865 - 873