Approximating sum-of-segments axial length from a traditional optical low-coherence reflectometry measurement

被引:57
作者
Cooke, David L. [1 ,2 ]
Cooke, Timothy L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Great Lakes Eye Care, 2848 Niles Rd, St Joseph, MI 49085 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Neurol & Ophthalmol, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
关键词
INTRAOCULAR-LENS CALCULATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.026
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present the Cooke-modified axial length (CMAL(Initial)) method, which closely approximates sum-of-segments AL. Notably, sum-of-segments AL has been shown to improve predictions of many intraocular lens (IOL) power formulas; however, calculating this AL requires information that is not readily available. Design: Comparative case series. Patients: Distinct datasets of 215 eyes and 1442 eyes, which were measured before cataract surgery with a commercially available optical biometer (Lenstar LS 900), were identified. The AL measured by this machine was labeled "traditional AL." Main Outcome Measure: Prediction Error. Methods: The CMAL(Initial), sum-of-segments AL, and traditional AL methods with Bland-Altman plots and r(2) values were compared, along with graphs of prediction errors. Results: The CMAL(Initial) was developed from 215 eyes and evaluated in the 1422-eye validation dataset. The r(2) for CMAL(Initial) versus the sum-of-segments AL was 0.99983. The predictions based on CMAL(Initial) were compared with those based on traditional AL using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, SFIK/T, and Holladay 2 IOL formulas. The CMAL(Initial) produced more accurate predictions in all four formulas (P<.001). Eyes in all datasets were then combined to create the final recommendation: CMAL(Final) = 1.23853 + 0.95855 x traditional AL - 0.05467 x lens thickness (all measurements in millimeters). Conclusions: A modified AL method (CMAL) was easy to calculate. Using CMAL improved predictions for at least four IOL power prediction formulas, especially at extreme ALs. Caution is advised if using CMAL with other formulas. (C) 2019 ASCRS and ESCRS
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 354
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Effect of altering lens constants [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 43 (06) :853-853
[2]   Comparison of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (08) :1157-1164
[3]   Prediction accuracy of preinstalled formulas on 2 optical biometers [J].
Cooke, David L. ;
Cooke, Timothy L. .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 42 (03) :358-362
[4]  
Cooke DL, 2019, J CATARACT REFRACT S, V45
[5]   Improving refractive outcomes at extreme axial lengths with the IOLMaster: the optical axial length and keratometric transformation [J].
Fam, H. B. ;
Lim, K. L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (05) :678-683
[6]   Comparison of immersion ultrasound biometry and partial coherence interferometry for intraocular lens calculation according to Haigis [J].
Haigis, W ;
Lege, B ;
Miller, N ;
Schneider, B .
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2000, 238 (09) :765-773
[7]  
Hoffer KJ, 2007, J CATARACT REFR SURG, V33, P2, DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.08.054
[8]  
Hoffer KJ, 2007, EYE LOND, V21, P4290
[9]   A 3-PART SYSTEM FOR REFINING INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER CALCULATIONS [J].
HOLLADAY, JT ;
PRAGER, TC ;
CHANDLER, TY ;
MUSGROVE, KH ;
LEWIS, JW ;
RUIZ, RS .
JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 14 (01) :17-24
[10]  
Holladay JT, 2014, HOLLADAY IOL CONSULT