Sound Masking Performance of Time-Reversed Masker Processed from the Target Speech

被引:15
作者
Jiang, Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liebl, Andreas [4 ]
Leistner, Philip [4 ]
Yang, Jun [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Acoust, Inst Acoust, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, State Key Lab Acoust, Inst Acoust, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Noise & Vibrat Res, Inst Acoust, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Fraunhofer Inst Bldg Phys IBP, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; RECEPTION THRESHOLD; INTERFERING-SPEECH; UNATTENDED SPEECH; FLUCTUATING NOISE; NORMAL-HEARING; OFFICE NOISE; DISRUPTION; PRIVACY; INTELLIGIBILITY;
D O I
10.3813/AAA.918499
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Noise is typically used as a masker to reduce speech intelligibility of ambient speech in offices. However, the efficiency of noise in masking speech is not satisfactory. In this paper, the masking produced by time reversal of the target speech was investigated. The masking efficiency, the subjective annoyance and the cognitive load produced by time-reversed maskers were measured to evaluate their performance. The results of the intelligibility test show that a time-reversed masker with the same target-to-masker ratio (TMR) as a noise masker is more efficient in reducing speech intelligibility. However, the results of a short-term memory test show that the cognitive load is not decreased when time-reversed maskers are used to mask the target speech, while the perceived annoyance of time-reversed maskers is no better, and sometimes worse, than that of the noise masker.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Masking speech with its time-reversed signal [J].
Arai, Takayuki .
ACOUSTICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) :188-190
[2]   Disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise [J].
Banbury, S ;
Berry, DC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 89 :499-517
[3]   Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements [J].
Banbury, SP ;
Berry, DC .
ERGONOMICS, 2005, 48 (01) :25-37
[4]   Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments [J].
Beaman, CP .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 19 (08) :1041-1064
[5]  
Beaman P., 1997, J EXPT PSYCHOL LEARN, V23, P459, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.459, 10.1037/0278-7393.23.2.459]
[6]  
Benjamini Y, 2001, ANN STAT, V29, P1165
[7]   Speech levels in meeting rooms and the probability of speech privacy problems [J].
Bradley, J. S. ;
Gover, B. N. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 127 (02) :815-822
[8]   Some spatial and temporal effects on the speech privacy of meeting rooms [J].
Bradley, John S. ;
Apfel, Marina ;
Gover, Bradford N. .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 125 (05) :3038-3051
[9]  
Bronkhorst AW, 2000, ACUSTICA, V86, P117
[10]   Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers [J].
Brungart, DS ;
Simpson, BD ;
Ericson, MA ;
Scott, KR .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2001, 110 (05) :2527-2538