Evaluation of Wondfo Chlamydia Trachomatis Rapid Diagnostic Cassette Based on nano-Gold Immunochromatography Gssay (GICA)

被引:1
作者
Peng, Yunping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Jihua [2 ]
Li, Wenmei [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Junlin [3 ]
Yu, Shujuan [1 ]
机构
[1] S China Univ Technol, Sch Food & Bioengn, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech Co Ltd, Guangzhou 510643, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Inst Microbiol, Guangzhou 510070, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
APPLICATION OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-3 | 2011年 / 236-238卷
关键词
nano-gold immunochromatography assay; GICA; Chlamydia trachomatis; Rapid diagnostic Cassette; nanogold; immunochromatography assay; Chlamydia trachomatis(CT); direct fluorescent antibody (DFA);
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.236-238.2436
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
This paper explains and demonstrates how to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of wondfo chlamydia trachomatis rapid diagnostic cassette with GICA for detection of chlamydia trachomatis. 1026 genital specimens were collected from 630 females and 396 males.Two cassettes of wondfo and ClearView were used for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis samples with blind detection simultaneously, inconsistent results by DFA. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of wondfo cassette were analyzed. Out of 1026 samples detected, 83 were positive by both of wondfo and ClearView and 13 showed different results by wondfo and ClearView. Out of the 13 samples, the DFA confirmed 9 were positive. Therefore, 92 samples were truly positive and 934 were truly negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of wondfo were 96.74% ,99.6% , 95.7% , 99.68%, respectively. The consistent rates of test results of the chlamydia trachomatis rapid diagnostic cassette, wondfo and ClearView, both were the same 98.64%. Of the three standard strains and two clinical strains of dilution test results showed that the sensitivity of wondfo slightly ClearView. The sensitivity and specificity of wondfo for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis have the accept tability for clinical diagnostic and surveillance data.
引用
收藏
页码:2436 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Betsou F, 2003, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V41, P1274
[2]  
Ding Jian-zu, 2010, Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi, V28, P30
[3]  
Ding JZ, 2010, ZHONGGUO JI SHENG CH, V28, P30
[4]  
Dreses-Werringloer U, 2003, ANTIMICROB AGENTS CH, V47, P2316
[5]  
[黄海峰 HUANG Haifeng], 2006, [中华医院感染学杂志, Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology], V16, P469
[6]  
Huang HF, 2006, CHINESE J NOSOCOMIOL, V16, P469
[7]  
Johnson RE, 2000, J CLIN MICROBIOL, V12, P4382
[8]  
Keegan H, 2005, CYTOPATHOLOGY, V16, P82
[9]   Chlamydia trachomatis infections -: a major concern for reproductive health.: Where do we stand regarding epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy? [J].
Mårdh, PA ;
Novikova, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2001, 6 (02) :115-126
[10]  
NCCLS, 2000, CLIN LAB, V20