Prevalence, diagnosis and outcome of cleft lip with or without cleft palate in The Netherlands

被引:23
|
作者
Fleurke-Rozema, J. H. [1 ]
Van De Kamp, K. [2 ]
Bakker, M. K. [1 ]
Pajkrt, E. [2 ]
Bilardo, C. M. [1 ]
Snijders, R. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Obstet, Huispostcode CB20,POB 30001, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Obstet, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
anomaly scan; cleft lip; facial cleft; registration; screening; PRENATAL ULTRASOUND; OROFACIAL CLEFTS; FACIAL CLEFTS; POPULATION; PREGNANCY; ACCURACY; IMPACT; SCAN;
D O I
10.1002/uog.15834
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To examine the accuracy and timing of diagnosis of fetal cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL +/- P) in the years following the introduction of a national screening program, and to assess the completeness and accuracy of information in The Netherlands Perinatal Registry. Methods A list was obtained of cases with a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of CL +/- P from two fetal medicine units between 2008 and 2012. All cases of CL +/- P were included irrespective of the presence or absence of additional anomalies. Cases were included if the estimated date of delivery was between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2012. Results During the study period, 330 cases of CL +/- P were identified, with a prevalence of 15 per 10 000 pregnancies. The number of cases that were detected before 24 weeks' gestation increased during the study period, while the rate of termination of pregnancy did not change significantly (P=0.511). CL +/- P was isolated in 217 (66%) cases and karyotype was abnormal in 69 (21%) cases. In 5% of the cases in which CL +/- P seemed to be isolated during the 18-23-week anomaly scan, postnatal array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) revealed an abnormal karyotype and 50% of these cases had major additional anomalies. Examination of data from The Netherlands Perinatal Registry demonstrated that in 37% of cases CL +/- P was not recorded in the pregnancy records. Conclusion CL +/- P is increasingly being diagnosed prenatally, without a significant effect on the rate of pregnancy termination. Further improvement in the diagnostic accuracy may be achieved by advocating prenatal array-CGH to reduce the frequency of unexpected anomalies being diagnosed after birth. It is important that healthcare providers register accurately the presence or absence of anomalies in the birth records to ensure that, in the future, data from The Netherlands Perinatal Registry can be relied upon to monitor prevalence. Copyright (C) 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: Retrospective study and review
    Guyot, A.
    Soupre, V.
    Vazquez, M. -P.
    Picard, A.
    Rosenblatt, J.
    Garel, C.
    Gonzales, M.
    Marlin, S.
    Benifla, J. -L.
    Jouannic, J. -M.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2013, 42 (02): : 151 - 158
  • [2] Epidemiology of cleft lip with or without cleft palate in Thais
    Ittiwut, Rungnapa
    Siriwan, Pichit
    Suphapeetiporn, Kanya
    Shotelersuk, Vorasuk
    ASIAN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 10 (04) : 335 - 338
  • [3] Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and cleft lip palate - a case series
    Marginean, Claudiu
    Sasaran, Vladut
    Marginean, Cristina Oana
    Melit, Lorena Elena
    Marginean, Maria Oana
    MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2018, 20 (04) : 531 - 535
  • [4] Whorl Patterns on the Lower Lip Are Associated With Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate
    Neiswanger, Katherine
    Chirigos, Kevin W.
    Klotz, Cherise M.
    Cooper, Margaret E.
    Bardi, Kathleen M.
    Brandon, Carla A.
    Weinberg, Seth M.
    Vieira, Alexandre R.
    Martin, Rick A.
    Czeizel, Andrew E.
    Castilla, Eduardo E.
    Poletta, Fernando A.
    Marazita, Mary L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2009, 149A (12) : 2673 - 2679
  • [5] Pregnancy and neonatal outcome following an antenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate
    Michel, Benedicte
    Debauche, Christian
    Hutchings, Graham
    Bernard, Pierre
    Biard, Jean-Marc
    Francois, Genevieve
    Bayet, Benedicte
    Williams, Olivia
    JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 41 (03) : 287 - 294
  • [6] Fetal cleft lip with and without cleft palate: Comparison between MR imaging and US for prenatal diagnosis
    Wang, Guangbin
    Shan, Ruiqin
    Zhao, Lianxin
    Zhu, Xiangyu
    Zhang, Xinjuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 79 (03) : 437 - 442
  • [7] Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Salari, Nader
    Darvishi, Niloofar
    Heydari, Mohammadbagher
    Bokaee, Shadi
    Darvishi, Fateme
    Mohammadi, Masoud
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (02) : 110 - 120
  • [8] Filipino Explanatory Models of Cleft Lip With or Without Cleft Palate
    Daack-Hirsch, Sandra
    Gamboa, Henrietta
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2010, 47 (02) : 122 - 133
  • [9] CLEFT LIP WITH OR WITHOUT CLEFT PALATE - ITS INCIDENCE AT BIRTH
    Damasaru, Elena
    Nicolae, Cristina
    Caraiane, Aureliana
    Bordeianu, Ion
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 23 (03) : 446 - 450
  • [10] Prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate; pitfalls and considerations
    Kim D.W.
    Chung S.-W.
    Jung H.-D.
    Jung Y.-S.
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 37 (1)