H-bond network optimization in protein-protein complexes: Are all-atom force field scores enough?

被引:11
作者
Masone, Diego [1 ]
Cabeza de Vaca, Israel [1 ]
Pons, Carles [1 ]
Fernandez Recio, Juan [1 ]
Guallar, Victor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Spain Supercomp Ctr, Joint BSC IRB Res Program Computat Biol, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] ICREA, Barcelona 08010, Spain
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
docking refinement; hierarchical protocol; implicit solvent; near-native solutions; SIDE-CHAIN; GLOBAL FLEXIBILITY; NORMAL-MODES; DOCKING; PREDICTION; ELECTROSTATICS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/prot.23239
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Structural prediction of proteinprotein complexes given the structures of the two interacting compounds in their unbound state is a key problem in biophysics. In addition to the problem of sampling of near-native orientations, one of the modeling main difficulties is to discriminate true from false positives. Here, we present a hierarchical protocol for docking refinement able to discriminate near native poses from a group of docking candidates. The main idea is to combine an efficient sampling of the full system hydrogen bond network and side chains, together with an all-atom force field and a surface generalized born implicit solvent. We tested our method on a set of twenty two complexes containing a near-native solution within the top 100 docking poses, obtaining a near native solution as the top pose in 70% of the cases. We show that all atom force fields optimized H-bond networks do improve significantly state of the art scoring functions. Proteins 2011. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 824
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions [J].
Bahadur, R. P. ;
Zacharias, M. .
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES, 2008, 65 (7-8) :1059-1072
[2]  
Bahar I, 1997, PROTEINS, V29, P172, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(199710)29:2<172::AID-PROT5>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]   Exploring Hierarchical Refinement Techniques for Induced Fit Docking with Protein and Ligand Flexibility [J].
Borrelli, Kenneth W. ;
Cossins, Benjamin ;
Guallar, Victor .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2010, 31 (06) :1224-1235
[5]   PELE: Protein energy landscape exploration. A novel Monte Carlo based technique [J].
Borrelli, KW ;
Vitalis, A ;
Alcantara, R ;
Guallar, V .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2005, 1 (06) :1304-1311
[6]   pyDock: Electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking [J].
Cheng, Tammy Man-Kuang ;
Blundell, Tom L. ;
Fernandez-Recio, Juan .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2007, 68 (02) :503-515
[7]   HADDOCK: A protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information [J].
Dominguez, C ;
Boelens, R ;
Bonvin, AMJJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 125 (07) :1731-1737
[8]   Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information [J].
Gabb, HA ;
Jackson, RM ;
Sternberg, MJE .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 272 (01) :106-120
[9]   Protein-protein docking benchmark version 4.0 [J].
Hwang, Howook ;
Vreven, Thom ;
Janin, Joel ;
Weng, Zhiping .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2010, 78 (15) :3111-3114
[10]   A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction [J].
Jacobson, MP ;
Pincus, DL ;
Rapp, CS ;
Day, TJF ;
Honig, B ;
Shaw, DE ;
Friesner, RA .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2004, 55 (02) :351-367