Co-contraction of cervical muscles during sagittal and coronal neck motions at different movement speeds

被引:45
作者
Cheng, Chih-Hsiu
Lin, Kwan-Hwa [2 ]
Wang, Jaw-Lin [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Inst Biomed Engn, Taipei 10016, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Coll Med, Sch & Grad Inst Phys Therapy, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
关键词
cervical spine; co-contraction; stiffness; voluntary neck movement; electromyography;
D O I
10.1007/s00421-008-0760-4
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Muscle co-contraction is important in stabilizing the spine. The effects of movement speed and direction on the cervical co-contraction were, however, not yet investigated. Surface electromyographies of three paired cervical muscles were measured in 17 young healthy subjects. The subjects performed voluntary neck movements in sagittal and coronal plane at fast, medium, and slow speeds. The co-contraction ratio was defined as the normalized integration of antagonistic electromyographic activities divided by that of total muscle activities. The results showed that the co-contraction ratio at fast speed (0.42 +/- 0.21) was smaller than that at medium (0.45 +/- 0.20) and slow (0.46 +/- 0.19) speeds (P <= 0.001). The co-contraction ratio was different between flexion and extension, but was similar between left and right lateral bending. The implications of co-contraction patterns include: (1) agonistic activities increase with speed but antagonistic activities do not increase accordingly; (2) neck extensors are highly activated during sagittal motions; and (3) muscular activations are symmetric during coronal motions. In conclusion, the co-contraction patterns from young healthy subjects demonstrate normal neuromuscular control in regulating the stiffness of cervical spine, and may further be references to assess the neck disorders in elderly or patients.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 654
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Head and neck position sense [J].
Armstrong, Bridget ;
McNair, Peter ;
Taylor, Denise .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (02) :101-117
[2]   Coactivation of the elbow antagonist muscles is not affected by the speed of movement in isokinetic exercise [J].
Bazzucchi, I ;
Sbriccoli, P ;
Marzattinocci, G ;
Felici, F .
MUSCLE & NERVE, 2006, 33 (02) :191-199
[3]   Velocity-dependent muscle strategy during plantarflexion in humans [J].
Carpentier, A ;
Duchateau, J ;
Hainaut, K .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 1996, 6 (04) :225-233
[4]   Quantitative assessment of co-contraction in cervical musculature [J].
Choi, H .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2003, 25 (02) :133-140
[5]   Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: Implications for injury and chronic low back pain [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
McGill, SM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (01) :1-15
[6]   Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography [J].
Clancy, EA ;
Morin, EL ;
Merletti, R .
JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (01) :1-16
[7]   EULER STABILITY OF THE HUMAN LIGAMENTOUS LUMBAR SPINE .2. EXPERIMENT [J].
CRISCO, JJ ;
PANJABI, MM ;
YAMAMOTO, I ;
OXLAND, TR .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1992, 7 (01) :27-32
[8]   THE INTERSEGMENTAL AND MULTISEGMENTAL MUSCLES OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - A BIOMECHANICAL MODEL COMPARING LATERAL STABILIZING POTENTIAL [J].
CRISCO, JJ ;
PANJABI, MM .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (07) :793-799
[9]  
Croce R V, 2003, Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, V43, P451
[10]   Computation of inverse functions in a model of cerebellar and reflex pathways allows to control a mobile mechanical segment [J].
Ebadzadeh, M ;
Tondu, B ;
Darlot, C .
NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 133 (01) :29-49