Radiofrequency ablation for common atrial flutter using an 8-mm tip catheter and up to 150W

被引:14
作者
Hillock, RJ [1 ]
Melton, IC [1 ]
Crozier, IG [1 ]
机构
[1] Christchurch Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Christchurch 8000, New Zealand
来源
EUROPACE | 2005年 / 7卷 / 05期
关键词
atrial flutter; catheter ablation;
D O I
10.1016/j.eupc.2005.03.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The formation of bi-directional block in atrial flutter can be adversely affected by problems with the delivery of effective energy related to isthmus anatomy and contact. Higher energies can produce larger and more effective lesions. The optimum setting for power delivery using temperature controlled ablation has not been established, with the maximum reported being 100 W. This is a retrospective review of the first 50 new cases assessing the efficacy and safety of using temperature controlled (60-65 degrees C) flutter ablation with an 8 mm tip electrode catheter and up to 150 W. All cases had either typical flutter alone (34%) or predominant flutter as the indication, no combined procedures were included. Acute procedural success was 94% and long-term success of 88%. Median number of ablations required was 11 (interquartile range 10-19), median procedure time 120 min (IQR 102-164), fluoroscopy time 22 min (IQR 17-36), radiation dose 17 Gy cm(2) (IQR 10-27), median number of lines 1 (IQR 1-2). Six patients achieved 150 W, but 42 achieved > 100 W (median watts 142 W, IQR 104-147). Patients (12%) experienced an uncomplicated pop during the procedure. None experienced a significant complication. There were three late relapses. The setting of 150 V, maximum delivered energy in temperature regulated ablation allowed higher,energies (> 100 W) to be delivered in most patients. This resulted in acute and long-term success rates that compare well with the literature but is associated with a 12% rate of pop. Subsequent to this series our 54th patient sustained a pop due to high-energy ablation that resulted in perforation and tamponade, from which there was survival. (c) 2005 The European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 412
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Catheter tip orientation affects radiofrequency ablation lesion size in the canine left ventricle
    Chugh, SS
    Chan, RC
    Johnson, SB
    Packer, DL
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1999, 22 (03): : 413 - 420
  • [2] Radiofrequency catheter ablation of type 1 atrial flutter using large-tip 8-or 10-mm electrode catheters and a high-output radiofrequency energy generator - Results of a multicenter safety and efficacy study
    Feld, G
    Wharton, M
    Plumb, V
    Daoud, E
    Friehling, T
    Epstein, L
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (08) : 1466 - 1472
  • [3] Case report: Severe skin burn at the site of the indifferent electrode after radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Goette, A
    Reek, S
    Klein, HU
    Geller, JC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 5 (03) : 337 - 340
  • [4] Right atrial angiographic evaluation of the posterior isthmus -: Relevance for ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Heidbüchel, H
    Willems, R
    van Rensburg, H
    Adams, J
    Ector, H
    Van de Werf, F
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (18) : 2178 - 2184
  • [5] THE MULTICENTER-EUROPEAN-RADIOFREQUENCY-SURVEY (MERFS) - COMPLICATIONS OF RADIOFREQUENCY CATHETER ABLATION OF ARRHYTHMIAS
    HINDRICKS, G
    ALIOT, E
    ALMENDRAL, JM
    AMLIE, J
    ARLOTTI, M
    BARNAY, C
    BASHIR, Y
    BERGFELDT, L
    BLANC, J
    HIMBERT, J
    THOMSEN, PEB
    BLOMSTROMLUNDQVIST, C
    BREMBILLAPERROT, B
    BRUGADA, P
    BRUGADA, J
    COWAN, JC
    CAUCHEMEZ, B
    CLEMENTY, J
    COBBE, S
    CRITELLI, G
    CRIJNS, H
    DAUBERT, JC
    DESOUSA, J
    DJIANE, P
    DONZEAU, JP
    DUCKECK, W
    EDWARDSSON, N
    FARRE, J
    COSNAY, P
    FONTAINE, G
    FROMER, M
    GOICOLEA, A
    GONSKA, BD
    GROLLEAURAOUX, R
    HAISSAGUERRE, M
    HAVERKAMP, W
    HERMIDA, JS
    HIEF, C
    HOPP, HW
    HOFFMAN, E
    HUIKURI, H
    JORDAENS, L
    KALUSCHE, D
    KUHLKAMP, V
    LAUCEVICIUS, A
    LAVERGNE, T
    MANZ, M
    MOLLER, M
    MONT, L
    NATHAN, AW
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 14 (12) : 1644 - 1653
  • [6] Recurrent atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: A very long-term follow-up of 333 patients
    Hsieh, MH
    Tai, CT
    Chiang, CE
    Tsai, CF
    Yu, WC
    Chen, YJ
    Ding, YA
    Chen, SA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 7 (03) : 225 - 231
  • [7] Prospective randomized comparison of irrigated-tip versus conventional-tip catheters for ablation of common flutter
    Jaïs, P
    Shah, DC
    Haissaguerre, M
    Hocini, M
    Garrigue, S
    Le Metayer, P
    Clémenty, J
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (07) : 772 - 776
  • [8] Comparison of effectiveness of an 8-mm versus a 4-mm tip electrode catheter for radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Kasai, A
    Anselme, F
    Tee, WS
    Cribier, A
    Saoudi, N
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (09) : 1029 - 1032
  • [9] Phased-array intracardiac echocardiography for defining cavotricuspid isthmus anatomy during radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Morton, JB
    Sanders, P
    Davidson, NC
    Sparks, PB
    Vohra, JK
    Kalman, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (06) : 591 - 597
  • [10] Acute coronary occlusion during radiofrequency catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter
    Ouali, S
    Anselme, F
    Savouré, A
    Cribier, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (10) : 1047 - 1049