Impact of Institutional Quality on Foreign Direct Investment Inflow: Evidence from Croatia

被引:9
作者
Jurcic, Ljubo [1 ]
Franc, Sanja [1 ]
Barisic, Antea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Fac Econ & Business, Zagreb, Croatia
来源
BUSINESS SYSTEMS RESEARCH JOURNAL | 2020年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
Croatia; economic determinants; foreign direct investment; institutional quality; FDI; DETERMINANTS; ATTRACTIVENESS; CORRUPTION; SPILLOVERS;
D O I
10.2478/bsrj-2020-0004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Background: Foreign direct investment (FDI) flows are unevenly distributed around the world and determined by different factors. The literature points out to economic and non-economic determinants of FDI flows, while the latter have shown to generate ambiguous effects across regions. Objectives: The primary goal of this paper is to examine the relationship between non-economic determinants and the FDI inflow in Croatia from 1996 to 2017, thus capturing different periods of the economic cycle. The importance of non-economic institutional determinants of FDI is analysed in parallel with the economic determinants. Methods/Approach: This study uses available data on FDI per capita and a set of non-economic (institutional) and economic determinants. We employed the OLS regression analysis to determine the significance of FDI inflow determinants and compare the relevance of non-economic to economic factors. Results: Results of this exploratory study show that institutional quality variables included in the model (regulatory quality, political stability, and government effectiveness, the rule of law and control of corruption) could not be pointed out as important determinants of the FDI inflow in Croatia. Economic variables GDP per capita and average gross wage prove to be important in determining the FDI inflow in Croatia. Conclusions: The research results point to a variety of FDI determinants among countries and economic cycle periods. Given the evidence from Croatia, variations, especially in institutional determinants, might be caused by the diverse FDI inflow characteristics and specificities of receiving economies.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 58
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] The effect of corruption, trade openness and political stability on foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from BRIC countries
    Abdella, Ahmed Berhan
    Naghavi, Navaz
    Fah, Benjamin Chan Yin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 2018, 5 (03): : 32 - 38
  • [2] Inward FDI and growth: The role of macroeconomic and institutional environment
    Alguacil, M.
    Cuadros, A.
    Orts, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2011, 33 (03) : 481 - 496
  • [3] [Anonymous], 132 INT MON FUND
  • [4] [Anonymous], 11192 INT MON FUND
  • [5] Assuncao S., 2011, 422 FAC EC U PORT
  • [6] Bayar Y., 2016, ECOFORUM, V5, P303
  • [7] CORRUPTION AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT: A PANEL GRAVITY MODEL APPROACH
    Bellos, Sotirios
    Subasat, Turan
    [J]. BULLETIN OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH, 2012, 64 (04) : 565 - 574
  • [8] Institutional determinants of foreign direct investment
    Benassy-Quere, Agnes
    Coupet, Maylis
    Mayer, Thierry
    [J]. WORLD ECONOMY, 2007, 30 (05) : 764 - 782
  • [9] Botric V., 2006, Transit Stud Rev, V13, P359, DOI [10.1007/s11300-006-0110-3, DOI 10.1007/S11300-006-0110-3]
  • [10] Corruption and market attractiveness influences on different types of FDI
    Brouthers, Lance Eliot
    Gao, Yan
    McNicol, Jason Patrick
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (06) : 673 - 680