Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool

被引:62
作者
Martin, RobRoy L. [1 ,2 ]
Kivlan, Benjamin R. [1 ]
Christoforetti, John J. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wolff, Andrew B. [6 ]
Nho, Shane J. [7 ]
Salvo, John P., Jr. [8 ,9 ]
Ellis, Thomas J. [10 ]
Van Thiel, Geoff [11 ,12 ,13 ,14 ]
Matsuda, Dean K. [15 ]
Carreira, Dominic S. [16 ]
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Rangos Sch Hlth Sci, 600 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Ctr Sports Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Allegheny Hlth Network, Ctr Athlet Hip Injury, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Amer Hip Inst, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Washington Orthopaed & Sports Med, Hip Preservat & Sports Med, Washington, DC USA
[7] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Div Sports Med,Hip Preservat Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[8] Thomas Jefferson Univ Hosp, Sidney Kimmel Med Coll, Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[9] Rothman Inst, Hip Arthroscopy Program, Philadelphia, PA USA
[10] Dublin Methodist Hosp, Ohio Orthoped Surg Inst, Orthoped One, Columbus, OH USA
[11] OrthoIllinois, Chicago, IL USA
[12] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[13] US Natl Soccer Teams, Chicago, IL USA
[14] Chicago Blackhawks Med Network, Chicago, IL USA
[15] Hip Arthroscopy DISC Sports & Spine Ctr, Marina Del Rey, CA USA
[16] Peachtree Orthoped, Atlanta, GA USA
关键词
CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ARTHROSCOPIC TREATMENT; GROIN DISABILITY; VALIDATION; VERSION; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; IHOT12;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2018.09.028
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology. Methods: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy. On initial assessment and follow-up between 335 and 395 days after surgery, subjects completed the iHOT-12 and a categorical self-rating of function (severely abnormal, abnormal, nearly normal, or normal). One-half the standard deviation (SD) of the change in 1-year iHOT-12 scores was used to calculate the MCID. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to determine SCB values. A change in SCB value was determined based on an improvement in the categorical rating of function. Absolute postoperative SCB scores were calculated to determine scores that would be associated with normal function ratings or with abnormal or severely abnormal function ratings. Results: Of 1,034 eligible patients, 733 (71%) met the inclusion criteria. The subjects consisted of 537 female patients (73%) and 196 male patients (27%), with a mean age of 35.3 years (SD, 13 years). At a mean of 352 days (SD, 21 days) after surgery, 536 patients (73%) were in the "improved" group and 197 (27%) were in the "not improved" group. The MCID was 13 points. An SCB change score of 28 points was able to identify patients who improved with high sensitivity (0.79) and specificity (0.72). Scores of 86 points or greater and 56 points or less were the cutoff values found to identify subjects who rated their function as normal and abnormal, respectively, with high sensitivity (0.74 and 0.90, respectively) and specificity (0.82 and 0.86, respectively). Conclusions: This study provides information to help interpret iHOT-12 scores for a follow-up period ranging between 335 and 395 days with MCID and SCB values of 13 and 28 points, respectively. In addition, a vpatient who scored 86 points or better was likely to have a normal rating of function, whereas a patient with a score of 56 points or less was likely to have an abnormal rating of function.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 416
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Validation of a German version of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT12) according to the COSMIN checklist
    Baumann, Florian
    Popp, Daniel
    Mueller, Karolina
    Mueller, Michael
    Schmitz, Paul
    Nerlich, Michael
    Fickert, Stefan
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2016, 14
  • [2] Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness
    Beaton, DE
    [J]. SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) : 3192 - 3199
  • [3] Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Assessment in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Guidance for Trial Protocol Writers
    Calvert, Melanie
    Kyte, Derek
    Duffy, Helen
    Gheorghe, Adrian
    Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca
    Ives, Jonathan
    Draper, Heather
    Brundage, Michael
    Blazeby, Jane
    King, Madeleine
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):
  • [4] Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Copay, Anne G.
    Berven, Sigurd H.
    Polly, David W.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2008, 90A (09) : 1839 - 1847
  • [5] APPLIED LOGISTIC-REGRESSION - HOSMER,DW, LEMESHOW,S
    GORTMAKER, SL
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 1994, 23 (01) : 159 - 159
  • [6] A Short Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for Use in Routine Clinical Practice
    Griffin, Damian R.
    Parsons, Nicholas
    Mohtadi, Nicholas G. H.
    Safran, Marc R.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (05) : 611 - 618
  • [7] MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS
    GUYATT, G
    WALTER, S
    NORMAN, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02): : 171 - 178
  • [8] Harris JD, 2017, ARTHROSCOPY, V33, P1102, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.053
  • [9] A standardised outcome measure of pain, symptoms and physical function in patients with hip and groin disability due to femoro-acetabular impingement: cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT12) in Swedish
    Jonasson, Pall
    Baranto, Adad
    Karlsson, Jon
    Sward, Leif
    Sansone, Mikael
    Thomee, Christoffer
    Ahlden, Mattias
    Thomee, Roland
    [J]. KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (04) : 826 - 834
  • [10] Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions
    Katz, Nathaniel P.
    Paillard, Florence C.
    Ekman, Evan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10