Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: results of a double-blind randomized study

被引:37
|
作者
Hamani, Clement [1 ,2 ]
Fonoff, Erich T. [1 ]
Parravano, Daniella C. [1 ]
Silva, Valquiria A. [3 ]
Galhardoni, Ricardo [3 ]
Monaco, Bernardo A. [1 ]
Navarro, Jessie [1 ]
Yeng, Lin T. [3 ]
Teixeira, Manoel J. [1 ,3 ]
de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Div Funct Neurosurg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Harquail Ctr Neuromodulat, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Pain Ctr, Dept Neurol, LIM 62, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
motor cortex stimulation; neuromodulation; pain; neuropathic; randomized clinical trial; DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awab189
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Motor cortex stimulation via surgically implanted electrodes has been used as an off-label treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, but its efficacy has not been fully established. We aimed to objectively study the efficacy of motor cortex stimulation and characterize potential predictors of response. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single centre trial, we recruited 18 patients with chronic neuropathic pain who did not adequately respond to conventional treatment and had a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score >= 6. Patients were initially assigned to receive 3 months of active ('on') or sham ('oif') stimulation in a double-blind cross-over phase. This was followed by a 3-month single-blind phase, and 6 months of open-label follow-up. A meaningful response in our trial was defined as a >= 30% or 2-point reduction in NRS scores during active stimulation. Using Bayesian statistics, we found a 41.4% probability of response towards on versus off motor cortex stimulation. The probability of improvement during active stimulation (double-blind, single-blind and open-label phases) compared to baseline was 47.2-68.5%. Thirty nine per cent of the patients were considered long-term responders, 71.4% of whom had facial pain, phantom limb pain or complex regional pain syndrome. In contrast, 72.7% of non-responders had either post-stroke pain or pain associated with brachial plexus avulsion. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had a substantial postoperative analgesic effect after electrode insertion in the absence of stimulation. Individuals with diagnoses associated with a good postoperative outcome or those who developed an insertional effect had a near 100% probability of response to motor cortex stimulation. In summary, we found that similar to 40% of patients responded to motor cortex stimulation, particularly those who developed an insertional effect or had specific clinical conditions that seemed to predict an appropriate postoperative response.
引用
收藏
页码:2994 / 3004
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Simultaneous Trial of Deep Brain and Motor Cortex Stimulation in Chronic Intractable Neuropathic Pain
    Son, Byung-chul
    Kim, Deok-ryeong
    Kim, Hyung-suk
    Lee, Sang-won
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2014, 92 (04) : 218 - 226
  • [42] NABUMETONE IN POSTOPERATIVE PAIN - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    PELLERIN, I
    RESTELLI, L
    VAIANI, G
    NATALE, C
    MOVILIA, PG
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1992, 31 : 170 - 170
  • [43] AMITRIPTYLINE AND CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER STUDY
    PHEASANT, H
    BURSK, A
    GOLDFARB, J
    AZEN, SP
    WEISS, JN
    BORELLI, L
    SPINE, 1983, 8 (05) : 552 - 557
  • [44] Stimulation of the motor cerebral cortex in chronic neuropathic pain: the role of electrode localization over motor somatotopy
    Afif, Afif
    Garcia-Larrea, Luis
    Mertens, Patrick
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 66 (06) : 560 - 570
  • [45] SimultaneousTrial of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) and Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) for Chronic, Intractable Neuropathic Pain
    Son, Byung-chul
    Kim, Hyung-suk
    Kim, Deog-ryeong
    Lee, Sang-Won
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 91 : 82 - 82
  • [46] A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROPATHIC CANCER PAIN
    BRUERA, E
    RIPAMONTI, C
    BRENNEIS, C
    MACMILLAN, K
    HANSON, J
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1992, 7 (03) : 138 - 140
  • [47] A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a glycine antagonist in neuropathic pain
    Wallace, MS
    Rowbotham, MC
    Katz, NP
    Dworkin, RH
    Dotson, RM
    Galer, BS
    Rauck, RL
    Backonja, MM
    Quessy, SN
    Meisner, PD
    NEUROLOGY, 2002, 59 (11) : 1694 - 1700
  • [48] Motor cortex rTMS reduces acute pain provoked by laser stimulation in patients with chronic neuropathic pain
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    Jarry, Gilbert
    Drouot, Xavier
    Menard-Lefaucheur, Isabelle
    Keravel, Yves
    Nguyen, Jean-Paul
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 121 (06) : 895 - 901
  • [49] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Mirror Therapy for Neuropathic Pain After Brachial Plexus Avulsion: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Pilot Study
    Ferreira, Clarice Martins
    de Carvalho, Carolina Dias
    Gomes, Ruth
    Bonifacio de Assis, Erickson Duarte
    Andrade, Suellen Marinho
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [50] Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Crossover Study of Short-Term Effect of Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain
    Raphael, Jon H.
    Raheem, Tarek A.
    Southall, Jane L.
    Bennett, Alan
    Ashford, Robert L.
    Williams, Sharon
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 12 (10) : 1515 - 1522