Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: results of a double-blind randomized study

被引:37
|
作者
Hamani, Clement [1 ,2 ]
Fonoff, Erich T. [1 ]
Parravano, Daniella C. [1 ]
Silva, Valquiria A. [3 ]
Galhardoni, Ricardo [3 ]
Monaco, Bernardo A. [1 ]
Navarro, Jessie [1 ]
Yeng, Lin T. [3 ]
Teixeira, Manoel J. [1 ,3 ]
de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Div Funct Neurosurg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Harquail Ctr Neuromodulat, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Pain Ctr, Dept Neurol, LIM 62, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
motor cortex stimulation; neuromodulation; pain; neuropathic; randomized clinical trial; DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awab189
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Motor cortex stimulation via surgically implanted electrodes has been used as an off-label treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, but its efficacy has not been fully established. We aimed to objectively study the efficacy of motor cortex stimulation and characterize potential predictors of response. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single centre trial, we recruited 18 patients with chronic neuropathic pain who did not adequately respond to conventional treatment and had a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score >= 6. Patients were initially assigned to receive 3 months of active ('on') or sham ('oif') stimulation in a double-blind cross-over phase. This was followed by a 3-month single-blind phase, and 6 months of open-label follow-up. A meaningful response in our trial was defined as a >= 30% or 2-point reduction in NRS scores during active stimulation. Using Bayesian statistics, we found a 41.4% probability of response towards on versus off motor cortex stimulation. The probability of improvement during active stimulation (double-blind, single-blind and open-label phases) compared to baseline was 47.2-68.5%. Thirty nine per cent of the patients were considered long-term responders, 71.4% of whom had facial pain, phantom limb pain or complex regional pain syndrome. In contrast, 72.7% of non-responders had either post-stroke pain or pain associated with brachial plexus avulsion. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had a substantial postoperative analgesic effect after electrode insertion in the absence of stimulation. Individuals with diagnoses associated with a good postoperative outcome or those who developed an insertional effect had a near 100% probability of response to motor cortex stimulation. In summary, we found that similar to 40% of patients responded to motor cortex stimulation, particularly those who developed an insertional effect or had specific clinical conditions that seemed to predict an appropriate postoperative response.
引用
收藏
页码:2994 / 3004
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cyclization of Motor Cortex Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Trial
    Ivanishvili, Zurab
    Poologaindran, Anujan
    Honey, Christopher R.
    NEUROMODULATION, 2017, 20 (05): : 497 - 503
  • [22] Effects of sub-perception threshold spinal cord stimulation in neuropathic pain: A randomized controlled double-blind crossover study
    Wolter, T.
    Kiemen, A.
    Porzelius, C.
    Kaube, H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2012, 16 (05) : 648 - 655
  • [23] Topical doxepin hydrochloride reduces neuropathic pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study
    McCleane, GJ
    PAIN CLINIC, 2000, 12 (01): : 47 - 50
  • [24] Transcranial magnetic stimulation and motor cortex stimulation in neuropathic pain
    Mylius, V.
    Ayache, S. S.
    Teepker, M.
    Kappus, C.
    Kolodziej, M.
    Rosenow, F.
    Nimsky, C.
    Oertel, W. H.
    Lefaucheur, J. P.
    SCHMERZ, 2012, 26 (06): : 655 - 660
  • [25] COMPARISON OF INJECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SHOULDER PAIN - RESULTS OF A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY
    HOLLINGWORTH, GR
    ELLIS, RM
    HATTERSLEY, TS
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 287 (6402): : 1339 - 1341
  • [26] Botulinum toxin A and chronic low back pain - A randomized, double-blind study
    Foster, L
    Clapp, L
    Erickson, M
    Jabbari, B
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (10) : 1290 - 1293
  • [27] Botulinum toxin for diabetic neuropathic pain A randomized double-blind crossover trial
    Yuan, R. -Y.
    Sheu, J. -J.
    Yu, J. -M.
    Chen, W. -T.
    Tseng, I. -J.
    Chang, H. -H.
    Hu, C. -J.
    NEUROLOGY, 2009, 72 (17) : 1473 - 1478
  • [28] Ketamine and Magnesium for Refractory Neuropathic Pain A Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Trial
    Pickering, Gisele
    Pereira, Bruno
    Morel, Veronique
    Corriger, Alexandrine
    Giron, Fatiha
    Marcaillou, Fabienne
    Bidar-Beauvallot, Assiya
    Chandeze, Evelyne
    Lambert, Celine
    Bernard, Lise
    Delage, Noemie
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 133 (01) : 154 - 164
  • [29] Primary motor cortex stimulation for intractable neuropathic pain
    Saitoh, Y.
    Hosorni, K.
    Kishima, H.
    Oshino, S.
    Hirata, M.
    Tani, N.
    Shimokawa, T.
    Yoshimine, T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH EUROPEAN CONGRESS OF NEUROSURGERY, 2007, : 669 - 672
  • [30] Transcranial magnetic stimulation for pain control.: Double-blind study of different frequencies against placebo, and correlation with motor cortex stimulation efficacy
    Andre-Obadia, Nathalie
    Peyron, Roland
    Mertens, Patrick
    Mauguiere, Francois
    Laurent, Bernard
    Garcia-Larrea, Luis
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (07) : 1536 - 1544