Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: results of a double-blind randomized study

被引:37
|
作者
Hamani, Clement [1 ,2 ]
Fonoff, Erich T. [1 ]
Parravano, Daniella C. [1 ]
Silva, Valquiria A. [3 ]
Galhardoni, Ricardo [3 ]
Monaco, Bernardo A. [1 ]
Navarro, Jessie [1 ]
Yeng, Lin T. [3 ]
Teixeira, Manoel J. [1 ,3 ]
de Andrade, Daniel Ciampi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Div Funct Neurosurg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Toronto, Harquail Ctr Neuromodulat, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Neurosurg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Pain Ctr, Dept Neurol, LIM 62, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
motor cortex stimulation; neuromodulation; pain; neuropathic; randomized clinical trial; DEEP BRAIN-STIMULATION; EFFICACY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awab189
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Motor cortex stimulation via surgically implanted electrodes has been used as an off-label treatment for chronic neuropathic pain, but its efficacy has not been fully established. We aimed to objectively study the efficacy of motor cortex stimulation and characterize potential predictors of response. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, single centre trial, we recruited 18 patients with chronic neuropathic pain who did not adequately respond to conventional treatment and had a numerical pain rating scale (NRS) score >= 6. Patients were initially assigned to receive 3 months of active ('on') or sham ('oif') stimulation in a double-blind cross-over phase. This was followed by a 3-month single-blind phase, and 6 months of open-label follow-up. A meaningful response in our trial was defined as a >= 30% or 2-point reduction in NRS scores during active stimulation. Using Bayesian statistics, we found a 41.4% probability of response towards on versus off motor cortex stimulation. The probability of improvement during active stimulation (double-blind, single-blind and open-label phases) compared to baseline was 47.2-68.5%. Thirty nine per cent of the patients were considered long-term responders, 71.4% of whom had facial pain, phantom limb pain or complex regional pain syndrome. In contrast, 72.7% of non-responders had either post-stroke pain or pain associated with brachial plexus avulsion. Thirty-nine per cent of patients had a substantial postoperative analgesic effect after electrode insertion in the absence of stimulation. Individuals with diagnoses associated with a good postoperative outcome or those who developed an insertional effect had a near 100% probability of response to motor cortex stimulation. In summary, we found that similar to 40% of patients responded to motor cortex stimulation, particularly those who developed an insertional effect or had specific clinical conditions that seemed to predict an appropriate postoperative response.
引用
收藏
页码:2994 / 3004
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of motor cortex stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain:: a randomized double-blind trial
    Velasco, Francisco
    Arguelles, Carlos
    Carrillo-Ruiz, Jose D.
    Castro, Guillermo
    Velasco, Ana Luisa
    Jimenez, Fiacro
    Velasco, Marcos
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 108 (04) : 698 - 706
  • [2] A Double-Blind Comparative Study of burstDR Versus Tonic Epidural Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Treatment of Intractable Neuropathic Pain
    Seznec, Yann
    Thomas, Joy
    Baptiste, Pelletier Jean
    Buhot, Benjamin
    Convers, Philippe
    Peyron, Roland
    Vassal, Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2025, 29 (02)
  • [3] Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain
    Carroll, D
    Joint, C
    Aziz, T
    McQuay, H
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PAIN, 2000, 16 : 1005 - 1012
  • [4] Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in the Treatment of Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain A Randomized, Double-blind Exploratory Study
    O'Connell, Neil E.
    Cossar, John
    Marston, Louise
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Bunce, David
    De Souza, Lorraine H.
    Maskill, David W.
    Sharp, Andrew
    Moseley, G. Lorimer
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2013, 29 (01): : 26 - 34
  • [5] Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial
    Hosomi, Koichi
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    Ikoma, Katsunori
    Nakamura, Yusaku
    Sugiyama, Kenji
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    Uozumi, Takenori
    Yamamoto, Takamitsu
    Saitoh, Youichi
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (07) : 1065 - 1072
  • [6] Motor cortex stimulation for chronic neuropathic pain: a preliminary study of 10 cases
    Carroll, D
    Joint, C
    Maartens, N
    Shlugman, D
    Stein, J
    Aziz, TZ
    PAIN, 2000, 84 (2-3) : 431 - 437
  • [7] Treatment of chronic neuropathic pain by motor cortex stimulation: Results of a bicentric controlled crossover trial
    Nguyen, Jean-Paul
    Velasco, Francisco
    Brugieres, Pierre
    Velasco, Marcos
    Keravel, Yves
    Boleaga, Bernardo
    Brito, Francisco
    Lefaucheur, Jean-Pascal
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (02) : 89 - 96
  • [8] Long-Term Results of Motor Cortex Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic, Intractable Neuropathic Pain
    Im, Sang-hyuk
    Ha, Sang-woo
    Kim, Deok-ryeong
    Son, Byung-chul
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 93 (03) : 212 - 218
  • [9] Effectiveness of tonic and burst motor cortex stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain
    Sokal, Pawel
    Harat, Marek
    Malukiewicz, Agnieszka
    Kiec, Michal
    Switonska, Milena
    Jablonska, Renata
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 1863 - 1869