Renal tumour anatomical characteristics and functional outcome after partial nephrectomy

被引:9
|
作者
Nisen, Harry [1 ]
Heimonen, Petri [2 ]
Kentta, Lauri [1 ,3 ]
Visapaa, Harri [1 ]
Nisen, Jessica [4 ]
Taari, Kimmo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Urol, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Radiol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Ctr Canc, Dept Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Social Res, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Surg, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Anatomical classification; kidney function; partial nephrectomy; renal cell carcinoma; PARENCHYMAL VOLUME PRESERVATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY-DISEASE; NEPHROMETRY SCORE; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; SERUM CREATININE; C-INDEX; PREDICTION; ASSOCIATION; PADUA;
D O I
10.3109/21681805.2014.978819
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. Anatomical features of renal tumours may be useful in predicting glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after partial nephrectomy. In this study, anatomical classification systems (ACSs) were compared to predict changes in renal function after surgery. Materials and methods. A group of 294 patients with T1 renal tumours receiving partial nephrectomy between January 2006 and June 2013 were identified from the institutional kidney tumour database. Preoperative images from computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed to assess diameter, PADUA (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical) classification score, RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumour, nearness of tumour deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and location relative to polar lines) nephrometry score, centrality index (C index) and renal tumour invasion index (RTII). GFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation preoperatively and 3 months after operation. Linear and logistic regression were applied as statistical methods. Results. Mean tumour diameter was 3.0 +/- 2.2 cm (range 1.0-7.0 cm). GFR was 85 +/- 22 ml/min/1.73 m(2) before the operation and 77 +/- 21 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (-8% change) 3 months after the operation. In univariate linear regression, the percentage change in GFR was weakly but statistically significantly associated with surgical approach (p = 0.04), indication for nephron sparing (p = 0.02), preoperative GFR (p < 0.001), PADUA (p = 0.02), RENAL (p = 0.01) and RTII (p = 0.003). In multivariate logistic regression analysis among patients with tumours 3 cm or larger, PADUA (odds ratio 1.55, p = 0.021) and RTII (odds ratio 3.87, p = 0.037) predicted at least a 20% reduction in GFR. Conclusions. Renal tumour ACSs may be clinically useful in predicting changes in renal function after partial nephrectomy in patients with larger tumours. The performance of RTII is equal to that of other ACSs in predicting changes in GFR.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 199
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of tumour morphology on renal function decline after partial nephrectomy
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Palazzi, Kerrin L.
    Kopp, Ryan P.
    Colangelo, Caroline J.
    Stroup, Sean P.
    Masterson, James H.
    Liss, Michael A.
    Cohen, Seth A.
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Park, Samuel K.
    Patterson, Anthony L.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (08) : E374 - E382
  • [2] Comparison of Renal Function after Partial Nephrectomy and Radical Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Miyamoto, Katsutoshi
    Inoue, Shogo
    Kajiwara, Mitsuru
    Teishima, Jun
    Matsubara, Akio
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 89 (02) : 227 - 232
  • [3] Renal tumour invasion index as a novel anatomical classification predicting urological complications after partial nephrectomy
    Nisen, Harry
    Ruutu, Mirja
    Glucker, Esko
    Visapaa, Harri
    Taari, Kimmo
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (01) : 41 - 51
  • [4] Renal Ischemia and Functional Outcomes Following Partial Nephrectomy
    Zabell, Joseph R.
    Wu, Jitao
    Suk-Ouichai, Chalairat
    Campbell, Steven C.
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017, 44 (02) : 243 - +
  • [5] Renal function in the elderly after radical tumor nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy
    Mehralivand, S.
    Thomas, C.
    Hampel, C.
    Thueroff, J. W.
    Roos, F. C.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (10): : 1375 - +
  • [6] Renal Ischemia and Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Collaborative Review of the Literature
    Volpe, Alessandro
    Blute, Michael L.
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Kutikov, Alexander
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Rogers, Craig
    Touijer, Karim A.
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Thompson, R. Houston
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (01) : 61 - 74
  • [7] Functional, oncological outcomes and safety of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus open partial nephrectomy in localized renal cell carcinoma patients with high anatomical complexity
    Liu, Zeqi
    Zhang, Xuanyu
    Lv, Peng
    Wu, Bin
    Bai, Song
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (10): : 7629 - 7637
  • [8] Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Bertolo, Riccardo
    Amparore, Daniele
    Fiori, Cristian
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (08) : 1125 - 1132
  • [9] The Effect of Patient and Surgical Characteristics on Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy
    Winer, Andrew G.
    Zabor, Emily C.
    Vacchio, Michael J.
    Hakimi, A. Ari
    Russo, Paul
    Coleman, Jonathan A.
    Jaimes, Edgar A.
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2018, 16 (03) : 191 - 196
  • [10] Determinants of renal functional decline after open partial nephrectomy: a comparison of warm, cold, and non-ischemic modalities
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Palazzi, Kerrin L.
    Mehrazin, Reza
    Cohen, Seth A.
    Masterson, James H.
    Woo, Jason R.
    Lee, Hak
    Liss, Michael A.
    Kopp, Ryan P.
    Wang, Song
    Stroup, Sean P.
    Patterson, Anthony L.
    L'Esperance, James O.
    Derweesh, Ithaar H.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) : 7126 - 7133