Effectiveness of selected premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load on commercial dairy farms

被引:38
作者
Gibson, H. [1 ]
Sinclair, L. A. [2 ]
Brizuela, C. M. [2 ]
Worton, H. L. [1 ]
Protheroe, R. G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wolverhampton Univ, Res Inst Healthcare Sci, Sch Appl Sci, Wolverhampton WV1 1SB, England
[2] Harper Adams Univ Coll, ASRC, Newport, Shrops, England
关键词
dairy hygiene; milk quality; premilking; teat bacterial load; teat cleaning;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02308.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: To determine the effectiveness of premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing the teat microbial load and effect on milk quality. Methods and Results: The effectiveness of several premilking teat-cleaning regimes in reducing teat microbial load was assessed using 40 cows on each of the four commercial UK dairy farms with herringbone parlours during two sampling periods. In the first experiment, all the treatments reduced teat total viable count (TVC), but there was no significant difference between the hypochlorite wash and dry wipe, iodine dip and dry and alcohol-medicated wipe or dry wipe alone. In the second experiment, the chlorine wash and dry wipe was significantly more effective in reducing teat TVC than a water wash and dry, chlorine dip and dry or a dry wipe. There was no relationship between cleaning regime and milk TVC, Enterobacteriaceae or Escherichia coli levels. Conclusions: All of the cleaning techniques studied reduced teat microbial load, however, the chlorine wash and dry was the most effective. Significance and Impact of the study: The premilking teat-cleaning techniques studied reduced the teat microbial load and therefore reduced the potential for milk contamination; however, a wash including an effective disinfectant followed by a dry wipe was the most effective.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Bramley A. J., 1992, MACHINE MILKING LACT
[2]   Microbiological composition of raw milk from selected farms in the Camembert region of Normandy [J].
Desmasures, N ;
Bazin, F ;
Gueguen, M .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 83 (01) :53-58
[3]  
Feldmann M, 2006, DEUT TIERARZTL WOCH, V113, P274
[4]   EFFECTS OF PREMILKING UDDER PREPARATION PRACTICES ON BACTERIAL COUNTS IN MILK AND ON TEATS [J].
GALTON, DM ;
PETERSSON, LG ;
MERRILL, WG .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1986, 69 (01) :260-266
[5]   EFFECTS OF PREMILKING UDDER PREPARATION ON BACTERIAL POPULATION, SEDIMENT, AND IODINE RESIDUE IN MILK [J].
GALTON, DM ;
PETERSSON, LG ;
MERRILL, WG ;
BANDLER, DK ;
SHUSTER, DE .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1984, 67 (11) :2580-2589
[6]  
GIBSON H, 2005, INVESTIGATION EFFECT
[7]   EFFECT OF UDDER PREPARATION ON TRANSMISSION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS WHILE MILKING WITH A MULTI-VALVED CLUSTER [J].
GRINDAL, RJ ;
BRAMLEY, AJ .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 1989, 56 (05) :683-690
[8]   Bacterial counts associated with sawdust and recycled manure bedding treated with commercial conditioners [J].
Hogan, JS ;
Bogacz, VL ;
Thompson, LM ;
Romig, S ;
Schoenberger, PS ;
Weiss, WP ;
Smith, KL .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1999, 82 (08) :1690-1695
[9]   A flow cytometric technique for quantification and differentiation of bacteria in bulk tank milk [J].
Holm, C ;
Mathiasen, T ;
Jespersen, L .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 97 (05) :935-941
[10]   An evaluation of raw milk microorganisms as markers of on-farm hygiene practices related to milking [J].
Hutchison, ML ;
Thomas, DJI ;
Moore, A ;
Jackson, DR ;
Ohnstad, I .
JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2005, 68 (04) :764-772