A Voting Mechanism Designed for Talent Shows in Mass Media: Weighted Preference of Group Decision Makers in Social Networks Using Fuzzy Measures and Choquet Integral

被引:7
作者
Cai, Mei [1 ]
Yan, Li [2 ,3 ]
Gong, Zaiwu [1 ]
Wei, Guo [4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Quebec Outaouais, Dept Adm Sci, Gatineau, PQ J8X 3X7, Canada
[3] Xidian Univ, Ctr Math & Interdisciplinary Sci, Xian 710071, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Univ North Carolina Pembroke, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Pembroke, NC 28372 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy measure; Social network; Interactions; Multiple group hierarchy decision; Choquet integral; DISCRETE CHOQUET; MODEL; MULTICRITERIA; INFORMATION; CRITERIA; OPTIONS; TRUST;
D O I
10.1007/s10726-020-09666-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
As the development of social networks tends to shape people's view about choices, decision making theories are challenged by numerous unprecedented difficulties, from both the theories and practice. One hot topic is how to design a voting mechanism for talent shows in mass media that not only attracts public attention but also reflects an objective and fair principle. Weighted voting, where the voting power of a representative is proportional to the population in his or her district, has been widely adopted in legislative selections and talent show competitions. However, weighted voting system may cause disenfranchisement of some representatives and reduce the entertainment and interest of talent shows because of the ignorance of complex interactions among the representatives. In this paper, possible interactions among representatives are analyzed by investigating the associated social networks and subsequently some fuzzy measures are utilized to quantify these interactions. Specifically, the weights determination model is adopted in this situation for defining fuzzy measures to avoid the disenfranchisement, and a multiple-group hierarchy decision model is developed to solve social network group decision making problems where the Choquet integral is employed to reduce the impact from synergy and redundancy between representatives. Moreover, a voting mechanism for talent shows in mass media is provided. Finally, an illustrative example, and a close look at the current algorithmic issues and future trends from different angles are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1261 / 1284
页数:24
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] A linguistic consensus model for Web 2.0 communities
    Alonso, S.
    Perez, I. J.
    Cabrerizo, F. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2013, 13 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [2] Robust Ordinal Regression and Stochastic Multiobjective Acceptability Analysis in multiple criteria hierarchy process for the Choquet integral preference model
    Angilella, Silvia
    Corrente, Salvatore
    Greco, Salvatore
    Slowinski, Roman
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2016, 63 : 154 - 169
  • [3] Description-oriented community detection using exhaustive subgroup discovery
    Atzmueller, Martin
    Doerfel, Stephan
    Mitzlaff, Folke
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 329 : 965 - 984
  • [4] Fast graph clustering with a new description model for community detection
    Bai, Liang
    Cheng, Xueqi
    Liang, Jiye
    Guo, Yike
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2017, 388 : 37 - 47
  • [5] BELIAKOV G, 2020, VALUE INTERACTION IN, P55
  • [6] On the Choquet multiple criteria preference aggregation model: Theoretical and practical insights from a real-world application
    Bottero, M.
    Ferretti, V
    Figueira, J. R.
    Greco, S.
    Roy, B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 271 (01) : 120 - 140
  • [7] Brans JP, 2005, INT SER OPER RES MAN, V78, P163, DOI 10.1007/b100605
  • [8] Fuzzy Group Decision Making for influence-aware recommendations
    Capuano, Nicola
    Chiclana, Francisco
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    Fujita, Hamido
    Loia, Vincenzo
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2019, 101 : 371 - 379
  • [9] CHERUBINI U, 2001, APPL MATH FINANCE, V8, P79, DOI DOI 10.1080/13504860110061013
  • [10] CHIESCU I, 2017, FUZZY SET SYST, V327, P48