Management of periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

被引:22
作者
Lemmens, Laura [1 ]
Geelen, Hans [1 ]
Depypere, Melissa [2 ]
De Munter, Paul [3 ]
Verhaegen, Filip [1 ]
Zimmerli, Werner [4 ]
Nijs, Stefaan [5 ,6 ]
Debeer, Philippe [1 ,6 ]
Metsemakers, Willem-Jan [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Orthopaed, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Clin Biol, Leuven, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Internal Med, Leuven, Belgium
[4] Kantonsspital Baselland, Interdisciplinary Unit Orthopaed Infect, Liestal, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Trauma Surg, Herestr 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
[6] Univ Leuven, KU Leuven, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; periprosthetic joint infection; Cutibacterium acnes; periprosthetic shoulder infection; functional outcome; surgical treatment; SINGLE-STAGE REVISION; ORTHOPEDIC INFECTIONS; JOINT INFECTION; DIAGNOSIS; DEBRIDEMENT; CULTURES; OUTCOMES; ACNES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.014
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a devastating complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Currently, scientific data related to the management of PSI are limited, and the optimal strategy and related clinical outcomes remain unclear. Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the management of periprosthetic joint infection are mainly based on data from patients after hip and knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these guidelines are also valid for patients with PSI after RSA. In addition, the functional outcome according to the surgical intervention was assessed. Methods: An RSA database was retrospectively reviewed to identify infections after primary and revision RSAs, diagnosed between 2004 and 2018. Data collected included age, sex, indication for RSA, causative pathogen, surgical and antimicrobial treatment, functional outcome, and recurrence. Results: Thirty-six patients with a PSI were identified. Surgical treatment was subdivided into debridement and implant retention (DAIR) ( n = 6, 17%); 1-stage revision (n = 1, 3%); 2-stage revision ( n = 16, 44%); multiple-stage revision (>2 stages) ( n = 7, 19%); definitive spacer implantation (n = 2, 6%); and resection arthroplasty (n = 4, 11%). The most common causative pathogens were Staphylococcus epidermidis (n = 11, 31%) and Cutibacterium acnes (n = 9, 25%). Recurrence was diagnosed in 4 patients (11%), all of whom were initially treated with a DAIR approach. The median follow-up period was 36 months (range, 24-132 months). Conclusion: PSI is typically caused by low-virulence pathogens, which often are diagnosed with a delay, resulting in chronic infection at the time of surgery. Our results indicate that treatment of patients with chronic PSI with DAIR has a high recurrence rate. In addition, implant exchange (ie, 1- and 2-stage exchange) does not compromise the functional result as compared with implant retention. Thus, patients with chronic PSI should be treated with implant exchange. Future research should further clarify which surgical strategy (ie, 1stage vs. 2-stage exchange) has a better outcome overall. (C) 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2514 / 2522
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Characteristics and outcome of 16 periprosthetic shoulder joint infections [J].
Achermann, Y. ;
Sahin, F. ;
Schwyzer, H. K. ;
Kolling, C. ;
Wuest, J. ;
Vogt, M. .
INFECTION, 2013, 41 (03) :613-620
[2]   Diagnostic Arthroscopy for Detection of Periprosthetic Infection in Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty [J].
Akguen, Doruk ;
Maziak, Nina ;
Plachel, Fabian ;
Minkus, Marvin ;
Scheibel, Markus ;
Perka, Carsten ;
Moroder, Philipp .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2019, 35 (09) :2571-2577
[3]   Hip and Knee Section, Treatment, Antimicrobials: Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections [J].
Anemueller, Ruben ;
Belden, Katherine ;
Brause, Barry ;
Citak, Mustafa ;
Del Pozo, Jose L. ;
Frommelt, Lars ;
Gehrke, Thorsten ;
Hewlett, Angela ;
Higuera, Carlos A. ;
Hughes, Harriet ;
Kheir, Michael ;
Kim, Kang-il ;
Konan, Sujith ;
Lausmann, Christian ;
Marculescu, Camelia ;
Morata, Laura ;
Ramirez, Isabel ;
Rossmann, Markus ;
Silibovsky, Randi ;
Soriano, Alex ;
Suh, Gina Ann ;
Vogely, Charles ;
Volpin, Andrea ;
Yombi, Jean ;
Zahar, Akos ;
Zimmerli, Werner .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (02) :S463-S475
[4]   One-stage revision for patients with a chronically infected reverse total shoulder replacement [J].
Beekman, P. D. A. ;
Katusic, D. ;
Berghs, B. M. ;
Karelse, A. ;
De Wilde, L. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (06) :817-822
[5]   Short-term outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a custom baseplate for severe glenoid deficiency [J].
Bodendorfer, Blake M. ;
Loughran, Galvin J. ;
Looney, Austin M. ;
Velott, Anthony T. ;
Stein, Jason A. ;
Lutton, David M. ;
Wiesel, Brent B. ;
Murthi, Anand M. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (05) :1060-1067
[6]   Cutibacterium acnes prosthetic joint infection: Diagnosis and treatment [J].
Boisrenoult, P. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2018, 104 (01) :S19-S24
[7]   Two-stage revision for infected shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Buchalter, Daniel B. ;
Mahure, Siddharth A. ;
Mollon, Brent ;
Yu, Stephen ;
Kwon, Young W. ;
Zuckerman, Joseph D. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (06) :939-947
[8]  
CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
[9]   The management of infection in arthroplasty of the shoulder [J].
Coste, JS ;
Reig, S ;
Trojani, C ;
Berg, M ;
Walch, G ;
Boileau, P .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (01) :65-69
[10]   The treatment of deep shoulder infection and glenohumeral instability with debridement, reverse shoulder arthroplasty and postoperative antibiotics [J].
Cuff, D. J. ;
Virani, N. A. ;
Levy, J. ;
Frankle, M. A. ;
Derasari, A. ;
Hines, B. ;
Pupello, D. R. ;
Cancio, M. ;
Mighell, M. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (03) :336-342