Centralized Patient-Reported Outcome Data Collection in Transplantation Is Feasible and Clinically Meaningful

被引:45
作者
Shaw, Bronwen E. [1 ]
Brazauskas, Ruta [1 ]
Millard, Heather R. [1 ]
Fonstad, Rachel [2 ]
Flynn, Kathryn E. [3 ]
Abernethy, Amy [4 ]
Vogel, Jenny [2 ]
Petroske, Charney [2 ]
Mattila, Deborah [2 ]
Drexler, Rebecca [2 ]
Lee, Stephanie J. [5 ]
Horowitz, Mary M. [1 ]
Rizzo, J. Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Ctr Int Blood & Marrow Transplant Res, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Med Coll Wisconsin, Ctr Patient Care & Outcomes Res, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[4] Flatiron Hlth, New York, NY USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Clin Res Div, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT); patient-reported outcomes; survival; transplantation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEMATOPOIETIC-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; LONG-TERM HEALTH; BMT CTN; MALIGNANCIES; FEASIBILITY; PREDICTS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.30936
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cures many patients, but often with the risk of late effects and impaired quality of life. The value of quantifying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is increasingly being recognized, but the routine collection of PROs is uncommon. This study evaluated the feasibility of prospective PRO collection by an outcome registry at multiple time points from unselected HCT patients undergoing transplantation at centers contributing clinical data to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR), and then it correlated the PRO data with clinical and demographic data. METHODS The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory measures were administered before HCT, on day 100, and at 6 and 12 months. Patients were recruited by the transplant center, but posttransplant PRO collection was managed centrally by the CIBMTR. RESULTS There were 580 eligible patients, and 390 (67%) enrolled. Feasibility was shown by high time-specific retention rates (176 of 238 at 1 year or 74%) and participant satisfaction. Factors associated with higher response rates were an age > 50 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-2.41; P = .0355), white race (OR, 4.61; 95% CI, 2.66-7.99; P < .0001), and being married (OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.42-3.65; P = .0006) for adults and a higher family income for children (OR, 4.99; 95% CI, 2.12-11.75; P = .0002). Importantly, pre-HCT PRO scores independently predicted survival after adjustments for patient-, disease-, and transplant-related factors. The adjusted probabilities of 1-year survival were 56%, 67%, 75%, and 76% by increasing quartiles of the pre-HCT FACT-BMT score and 58%, 72%, 62%, and 82% by increasing quartiles of the pre-HCT SF-36 physical component score. CONCLUSIONS A hybrid model of local consent for centralized PRO collection is feasible, and pretransplant PROs provide critical prognostic information for HCT outcomes. (C) 2017 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:4687 / 4700
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Endometriosis
    Nicolas-Boluda, Alba
    Oppenheimer, Anne
    Bouaziz, Jerome
    Fauconnier, Arnaud
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (21)
  • [42] Patient-reported outcome measures in urology
    Narang, Gopal L.
    Pannell, Stephanie C.
    Laviana, Aaron A.
    Huen, Kathy H. Y.
    Izard, Jason
    Smith, Angela B.
    Bergman, Jonathan
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 366 - 374
  • [43] Utility of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Heart Failure
    Kelkar, Anita A.
    Spertus, John
    Pang, Peter
    Pierson, Renee F.
    Cody, Robert J.
    Pina, Ileana L.
    Hernandez, Adrian
    Butler, Javed
    JACC-HEART FAILURE, 2016, 4 (03) : 165 - 175
  • [44] An introduction to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in physiotherapy
    Kyte, D. G.
    Calvert, M.
    van der Wees, P. J.
    ten Hove, R.
    Tolan, S.
    Hill, J. C.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2015, 101 (02) : 119 - 125
  • [45] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [46] What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? a systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme
    Browne, John Patrick
    Bastaki, Hamad
    Dawson, Jill
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2013, 11
  • [47] What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? a systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme
    John Patrick Browne
    Hamad Bastaki
    Jill Dawson
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11
  • [48] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma)
    Pellar, Russell E.
    Tingey, Theresa M.
    Pope, Janet Elizabeth
    RHEUMATIC DISEASE CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 42 (02) : 301 - +
  • [49] Selecting patient-reported outcome measures: "what" and "for whom"
    Liu, Jason B.
    Rothrock, Nan E.
    Edelen, Maria O.
    HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR, 2024, 2 (04):
  • [50] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24