Analysis of Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Buildings in Different Regions of China Based on STIRPAT Model

被引:24
|
作者
Cong, Xilong [1 ]
Zhao, Meijiao [2 ]
Li, Longxi [3 ]
机构
[1] Huadian Elect Power Res Inst, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] NF Energy Technol, Shenyang, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Univ Technol, Dalian, Peoples R China
来源
9TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING (ISHVAC) JOINT WITH THE 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUILDING ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT (COBEE) | 2015年 / 121卷
关键词
CO2 emissions of buildings; STIRPAT model; climate regions; DECOMPOSITION ANALYSIS; IMPACT; ENERGY; LMDI;
D O I
10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1057
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article focuses on CO2 emissions of buildings in China, the drivers of carbon dioxide emissions of buildings performing stage under the different climatic conditions have been studied by using the STIRPAT (stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology) model. Five factors were selected, including per capita floor space of residential buildings, floor space of buildings, household consumption level, output value of tertiary industry and unit building area of carbon dioxide emissions. According to the climatic conditions, the buildings of four climate regions are taken into account, which are Severe Cold (SC), Cold (C), Hot Summer Cold Winter (HSCW) and Hot Summer Warm Winter (HSWW), respectively. The factors are quantified through ridge regression. Empirical results indicate that all the factors can cause an increase in CO2 emissions among the four climate regions, although they have different degree influence on CO2 emissions from buildings in different climate regions. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:645 / 652
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Differential output growth across regions and carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from US and China
    Wang, Chunhua
    ENERGY, 2013, 53 : 230 - 236
  • [22] Scenario simulations for the peak of provincial household CO2 emissions in China based on the STIRPAT model
    Zhao, Litong
    Zhao, Tao
    Yuan, Rong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 809
  • [23] Industrial structure, technological progress and CO2 emissions in China: Analysis based on the STIRPAT framework
    Li, Wenwen
    Wang, Wenping
    Wang, Yu
    Qin, Yingbo
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2017, 88 (03) : 1545 - 1564
  • [24] A scenario analysis of Chinese carbon neutral based on STIRPAT and system dynamics model
    Wen, Lei
    Zhang, Jie
    Song, Qianqian
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (36) : 55105 - 55130
  • [25] Vulnerability of sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asian countries due to the carbon dioxide emissions: an assessment based on the STIRPAT model
    Aboyitungiye, Jean Baptiste
    Suryanto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND POLLUTION, 2021, 69 (1-2) : 99 - 111
  • [26] Analysis on influence factors of China's CO2 emissions based on Path-STIRPAT model
    Li, Huanan
    Mu, Hailin
    Zhang, Ming
    Li, Nan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (11) : 6906 - 6911
  • [27] Quantitative analysis of the impact factors of conventional energy carbon emissions in Kazakhstan based on LMDI decomposition and STIRPAT model
    Jiaxiu Li
    Yaning Chen
    Zhi Li
    Zhihui Liu
    Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2018, 28 : 1001 - 1019
  • [28] EMPIRICAL STUDY ON THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION ON CARBON EMISSIONS BASED ON EXTENDED STIRPAT MODEL
    Wang, Ran
    Sun, Tao
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2019, 28 (10): : 7514 - 7522
  • [29] Quantitative analysis of the impact factors of conventional energy carbon emissions in Kazakhstan based on LMDI decomposition and STIRPAT model
    Li Jiaxiu
    Chen Yaning
    Li Zhi
    Liu Zhihui
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 28 (07) : 1001 - 1019
  • [30] The Peak Value of Carbon Emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Based on the STIRPAT Model and Scenario Design
    Wen, Lei
    Liu, Yanjun
    POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2016, 25 (02): : 823 - 834