Midface-lift-aesthetic options for the infraorbital region

被引:0
作者
Richter, D. F. [1 ]
Wiedner, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Akad Lehrkrankenhaus, Dreifaltigkeits Krankenhaus, Bonner Str 84, D-50389 Wesseling, Germany
来源
JOURNAL FUR ASTHETISCHE CHIRURGIE | 2020年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Negative vector; Lower eyelid correction; Malar bags; Baggy eyelids; Transpalpebral orbital decompression; TRANSPALPEBRAL DECOMPRESSION; ENDOCRINE OPHTHALMOPATHY; INTRAORBITAL FAT; COMPLICATIONS; REJUVENATION; EXPERIENCE; OPERATIONS; REMOVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12631-020-00215-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment of the periorbital region is still a very demanding surgical procedure. In addition to the operation itself the correct preoperative diagnostics play an important role. In this context an important feature is the differentiation between positive and negative vectors. Patients with a negative vector have a high risk of postoperatively developing a lower eyelid malposition. For this reason, patients with a negative vector and a pathological value with the Hertel exophthalmometer are no longer routinely treated with a classical lower eyelid correction. Instead the subperiosteal midface-lift according to Hester has become established as the standard procedure. The most effective means of treatment of lacrimal sacs with a negative vector and malar bags is a subperiosteal midface-lift. It reduces the eyelid-cheek distance and blends the periorbital retaining ligaments. Furthermore, it confers volume to the lower eyelid and provides a stable support. Due to the nature of the procedure a previously existing negative vector is transformed into a neutral or even positive vector. In experienced hands the midface-lift is the ideal procedure for treatment of malar bags and the aesthetic correction of lower eyelids with a negative vector.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 25
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Rationale of treatment in Graves ophthalmopathy [J].
Clauser, L ;
Galiè, M ;
Sarti, E ;
Dallera, V .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2001, 108 (07) :1880-1894
[2]  
Codner Mark A, 2010, Plast Reconstr Surg, V126, p1e, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181dbc4a2
[3]   Algorithmic Approach to Lower Lid Blepharoplasty [J].
Collar, Ryan M. ;
Lyford-Pike, Sofia ;
Byrne, Patrick .
FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 29 (01) :32-39
[4]   Aesthetic Refinements in the Treatment of Graves Ophthalmopathy [J].
Doumit, Gaby ;
Abouhassan, William ;
Yaremchuk, Michael J. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (03) :519-526
[5]  
FLOWERS RS, 1993, CLIN PLAST SURG, V20, P351
[6]  
HAMRA ST, 1992, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V90, P1
[7]   Decreasing Complications in Lower Lid and Midface Rejuvenation: The Importance of Orbital Morphology, Horizontal Lower Lid Laxity, History of Previous Surgery, and Minimizing Trauma to the Orbital Septum: A Critical Review of 269 Consecutive Cases [J].
Hester, T. Roderick, Jr. ;
Douglas, Trent ;
Szczerba, Steven .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 123 (03) :1037-1049
[8]  
Hester TR, 2000, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V105, P393, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200001000-00063
[9]   Prominent eye: Operative management in lower lid and midfacial rejuvenation and the morphologic classification system [J].
Hirmand, H ;
Codner, MA ;
McCord, CD ;
Hester, TR ;
Nahai, F .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2002, 110 (02) :620-628
[10]  
JELKS GW, 1993, CLIN PLAST SURG, V20, P213