A Multichannel Platform for Participatory Budgeting

被引:1
|
作者
Sousa, Bruno [1 ]
Fonseca, Vitor [2 ]
Cordeiro, Luis [2 ]
Flamigni, Bianca [3 ]
Foschini, Luca [4 ]
Simoes, Paulo [5 ]
Sivarajah, Uthayasankar [6 ]
Weerakkody, Vishanth [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[2] OneSource, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Comp Engn, Bologna, Italy
[5] Univ Coimbra, CISUC DEI, Coimbra, Portugal
[6] Univ Bradford, Bradford, W Yorkshire, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
EMPATIA; ICT Platform; Multichannel Participation; Participatory Budgeting; Voting Systems;
D O I
10.4018/IJEGR.2019040104
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Participatory budgeting (PB) is currently one of the most widely adopted democratic innovations. ICT platforms are key enablers of PB processes, by supporting citizen engagement. They support the establishment of diverse participation channels to build candidate proposals, for the voting process, and for monitoring proposals' implementation. PB platforms differ from electronic voting systems, reflecting the intrinsic nature of PB processes. While vote secrecy and trustworthiness of voting results is still a major requirement, other factors weight in, such as the focus on the whole process and the need for engaging several citizens by providing multiple participation channels. PB processes take place at multiple scales (municipal, national) requiring flexible deployment and dimensioning approaches. EMPATIA is an ICT platform for PB, based on multiple dimensioning and deployment options that reflect the scenarios where PB tools are expected to operate. The evaluation results provide relevant inputs to the design and implementation of similar participatory and/or voting platforms.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 89
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Participatory Budgeting: Fairness and Welfare Maximization
    Sreedurga, Gogulapati
    MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, EUMAS 2022, 2022, 13442 : 439 - 443
  • [23] Participatory Budgeting: Findings from Germany
    Weber, Henriette I.
    Vogt, Sebastian
    Eberz-Weber, Lisa-Marie
    Steinmetz, Holger
    Wagner, Sascha A.
    Walther, Falko
    Weber, Patrick
    Kabst, Ruediger
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE DIGITAL AGE, 2015, 2 (02) : 33 - 53
  • [24] Participatory budgeting and political representation in China
    Frenkiel, Emilie
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE GOVERNANCE, 2021, 6 (01) : 58 - 80
  • [25] PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN THE CONTEXT OF BEHAVIOURAL FINANCES
    Lobodina, Zoriana
    Kizyma, Tetiana
    Demianyshyn, Vasyl
    Berezka, Kateryna
    Savchuk, Svitlana
    FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 5 (46): : 109 - 125
  • [26] ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF PARTICIPATORY BUDGETING IN CHILE
    Montecinos, Egon
    Carrasco, Manuel
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE ESTUDIOS MUNICIPALES, 2022, (25):
  • [27] Budgeting participatory: an approach to Information Science
    Lopes, Alex de Araujo
    Freire, Isa Maria
    EM QUESTAO, 2011, 17 (01): : 19 - 31
  • [28] Who is Interested in Participating in Participatory Budgeting?
    Doherty, David
    Pavel, Raluca G.
    Jackson, Madeline
    Garbarski, Dana
    STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2024, 24 (02) : 121 - 144
  • [29] Complexity of Manipulative Interference in Participatory Budgeting
    Baumeister, Dorothea
    Boes, Linus
    Hillebrand, Johanna
    ALGORITHMIC DECISION THEORY, ADT 2021, 2021, 13023 : 424 - 439
  • [30] Participatory budgeting for research funding decisions
    Calyx, Cobi
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2022, 18 (01): : 163 - 176