Effects of Traction on Interpretation of Lumbar Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A New Measurement Method and Diagnostic Criteria Based on Comparison of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Quantitative Computed Tomography

被引:12
作者
Lee, Je-Sang [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Keunyoung [3 ]
Jeon, Yun Kyung [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Jinmi [6 ]
Jung, Hwi [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sang Hun [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Myung Jun [1 ,2 ]
Shin, Yong Beom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Sch Med, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan, South Korea
[2] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, 179 Gudeok Ro, Busan, South Korea
[3] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & Biomed Res Inst, Busan, South Korea
[4] Pusan Natl Univ, Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Endocrinol,Sch Med, Busan, South Korea
[5] Pusan Natl Univ, Med Res Inst, Busan, South Korea
[6] Pusan Natl Univ Hosp, Clin Trial Ctr, Biomed Res Inst, Dept Biostat, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Bone density; duchenne muscular dystrophy; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; scoliosis; quantitative computed tomography; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; ROTATION CORRECTION; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; CURVE FLEXIBILITY; OSTEOPOROSIS; RADIOGRAPHS; STRENGTH; FEMUR; SPINE; PRONE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocd.2018.07.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the performance of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in evaluating bone mineral density (BMD) of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and scoliosis. Methodology: Twenty-nine participants (mean age 19.72 +/- 6.13 years) underwent whole spine radiography, DXA before and after traction, and QCT alone without traction. Scoliosis and vertebral rotation angles obtained before and after traction were compared, and BMD values from DXA were compared to those obtained via QCT. The scoliosis angle, presented as Cobb's angle of L1-L4, was measured. Results: Cobb's angle significantly decreased from 30.38 degrees +/- 24.83 degrees before traction to 22.78 degrees +/- 20.41 degrees after traction (p < 0.0001) and the Z-score decreased from -1.88 +/- 1.59 to -2.86 +/- 2.16 (p < 0.0001). Changes in rotation angle, BMD, and bone mineral content were not significant. Post-traction BMD values and Z-scores showed a higher correlation with QCT measurements than pretraction. Moreover, pre and post-traction Z-scores (<= -1.1 and -1.36, respectively) were more accurate in identifying patients with osteoporosis according to QCT scans compared with the preexisting Z-score of -2 or less. Conclusion: Lumbar BMD measured via DXA and scoliosis allowed a more accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis when traction was applied.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 62
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography
    Briggs, Andrew M.
    Perilli, Egon
    Parkinson, Ian H.
    Kantor, Susan
    Wrigley, Tim V.
    Fazzalari, Nicola L.
    Wark, John D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL METABOLISM, 2012, 30 (02) : 222 - 231
  • [22] Anomalies in the measurement of changes in bone mineral density of the spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Tothill, P
    Avenell, A
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 63 (02) : 126 - 133
  • [23] Pitfalls in the measurement of bone mineral density by the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric method
    Kiraç, FS
    Yüksel, D
    Yaylali, OT
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (10) : 874 - 875
  • [24] Bone mineral density in haemodialysis patients: A comparative study of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound
    Arici, M
    Erturk, H
    Altun, B
    Usalan, C
    Ulusoy, S
    Erdem, Y
    Sivri, A
    Yasavul, U
    Turgan, C
    Caglar, S
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 15 (11) : 1847 - 1851
  • [25] In vivo differences among scan modes in bone mineral density measurement at dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
    Bandirali, Michele
    Sconfienza, Luca M.
    Aliprandi, Alberto
    Di Leo, Giovanni
    Marchelli, Daniele
    Ulivieri, Fabio M.
    Sardanelli, Francesco
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2014, 119 (04): : 257 - 260
  • [26] Bone mineral density assessment -: Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus, spine, and hip
    Sweeney, AT
    Malabanan, AO
    Blake, MA
    Weinberg, J
    Turner, A
    Ray, P
    Holick, ME
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (01) : 57 - 62
  • [27] Inverse Correlation at the Hip Between Areal Bone Mineral Density Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Cortical Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measured by Quantitative Computed Tomography
    Amstrup, Anne Kristine
    Jakobsen, Niels Frederik Breum
    Lomholt, Soren
    Sikjaer, Tanja
    Mosekilde, Leif
    Rejnmark, Lars
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2016, 19 (02) : 226 - 233
  • [28] INFLUENCE OF PATIENTS WEIGHT ON DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY MEASUREMENTS OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY
    MARTIN, P
    VERHAS, M
    ALS, C
    GEERTS, L
    PATERNOT, J
    BERGMANN, P
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 3 (04) : 198 - 203
  • [29] Investigating comparability of quantitative computed tomography with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in assessing bone mineral density of patients with chronic spinal cord injury
    Khah, Hamid Reza Haghighat
    Moradi, Nahid
    Taheri, Taher
    Taheri, Morteza Sanei
    Rayegani, Seyed Mansoor
    SPINAL CORD, 2018, 56 (05) : 487 - 493
  • [30] Is Bone Mineral Density Measurement Using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Affected by Gamma Rays?
    Xie, Liang-Jun
    Li, Jian-Fang
    Zeng, Feng-Wei
    Jiang, Hang
    Cheng, Mu-Hua
    Chen, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2013, 16 (03) : 275 - 278