Accuracy of an intraoral digital impression: A review

被引:45
作者
Aswani, Kanchan [1 ]
Wankhade, Sattyam [1 ]
Khalikar, Arun [1 ]
Deogade, Suryakant [1 ]
机构
[1] Govt Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Prosthodont & Crown & Bridge, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Accuracy; digital impression; intraoral scanner; optical impression; FIXED DENTAL PROSTHESES; IN-VIVO PRECISION; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSION; CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; SCANNING SYSTEMS; INTERNAL FIT; 4-UNIT FDPS; SCANNERS; ZIRCONIA; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.4103/jips.jips_327_19
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Intraoral scanners (IOSs) are used for capturing the direct optical impressions in dentistry. The development of three-dimensional technology and the trend of increasing the use of IOSs in dental office routine lead to the need to assess the accuracy of intraoral digital impressions. The aim of this review was to assess the accuracy of the different IOS and the effect of different variables on the accuracy outcome. An electronic search using PubMed with specific keywords to obtain potential references for review. A search of MEDLINE (PubMed) identified 507 articles. After title and abstract screening, 412 articles were excluded for not meeting the inclusion criteria and discarding duplicate references. Ninety-five articles were followed for full screening; only 24 articles were included in the final analysis. The studies indicated a variable outcome of the different IOS systems. While the accuracy of IOS systems appears to be promising and comparable to conventional methods, they are still vulnerable to inaccuracies.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 37
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [32] Investigation of the effects of arch size and implant angulation on the accuracy of digital impression using two intraoral scanners: An in vitro study
    Geramipanah, Farideh
    Sadighpour, Leyla
    Payaminia, Leila
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2023, 9 (06): : 983 - 992
  • [33] Accuracy of digital auricular impression using intraoral scanner versus conventional impression technique for ear rehabilitation: A controlled clinical trial
    Dohiem, Mohamed M.
    Emam, Nourhan S.
    Abdallah, Mohamed Farouk
    Abdelaziz, Medhat Sameh
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (11) : 4254 - 4263
  • [34] Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro
    Ender, A.
    Zimmermann, M.
    Mehl, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2019, 22 (01) : 11 - 19
  • [35] Accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using conventional impression and scan model or intraoral digital impression: A randomised controlled trial with 1 year of follow-up
    Tallarico, Marco
    Xhanari, Erta
    Kim, Yong-Jin
    Cocchi, Fabio
    Martinolli, Matteo
    Alushi, Adem
    Meloni, Silvio Mario
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2019, 12 (02) : 197 - 206
  • [36] Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning - an in vivo study
    Roth, Ivett
    Czigola, Alexandra
    Joos-Kovacs, Gellert Levente
    Dalos, Magdolna
    Hermann, Peter
    Borbely, Judit
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [37] Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow
    Seelbach, Paul
    Brueckel, Cora
    Woestmann, Bernd
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2013, 17 (07) : 1759 - 1764
  • [38] Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters
    Chiu, Asher
    Chen, Yen-Wei
    Hayashi, Juri
    Sadr, Alireza
    SENSORS, 2020, 20 (04)
  • [39] Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete arch implant intraoral digital scans: A systematic review
    Paratelli, Andrea
    Vania, Stefano
    Gomez-Polo, Cristina
    Ortega, Rocio
    Revilla-Leon, Marta
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 129 (06) : 844 - 854
  • [40] Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison
    Robert Nedelcu
    Pontus Olsson
    Ingela Nyström
    Andreas Thor
    BMC Oral Health, 18