Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Kotronoulas, Grigorios [1 ]
Papadopoulou, Constantina [2 ]
MacNicol, Lorna [3 ]
Simpson, Mhairi [3 ]
Maguire, Roma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Livingstone Wer LT14-11,26 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XH, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Sch Hlth Nursing & Midwifery, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Wishaw Gen Hosp, Bothwell, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Unmet needs; Supportive care; Colorectal cancer; Cancer nurse specialist; Feasibility; Acceptability; Nurse led; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNMET NEEDS; SURVIVORS; INTERVENTION; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; DISTRESS; CONNECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Logistical issues pertinent to the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by colorectal cancer nurse specialists (CNS) to identify the needs of people with colorectal cancer (CRC) in acute care remain unknown. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of PROMs-driven, CNS-led consultations to enhance delivery of supportive care to people with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature review and focus groups with patients and CNS (Phase 1) were followed by a repeated-measures, exploratory study (Phase 2), whereby pre-consultation PROM data were collected during three consecutive, monthly consultations, and used by the CNS to enable delivery of personalised supportive care. Results: Based on Phase 1 data, the Supportive Care Needs Survey was selected for use in Phase 2. Fourteen patients were recruited (recruitment rate: 56%); thirteen (93%) completed all study assessments. Forty in-clinic patient-clinician consultations took place. At baseline, 219 unmet needs were reported in total, with a notable 21% (T2) and 32% (T3) over-time reduction. Physical/daily living and psychological domain scores declined from T1 to T3, yet not statistically significantly. In exit interviews, patients described how using the PROM helped them shortlist and prioritise their needs. CNS stressed how the PROM helped them tease out more issues with patients than they would normally. Conclusions: Nurse-led, PROMs-driven needs assessments with patients with CRC appear to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice, possibly associated with a sizeable reduction in the frequency of unmet needs, and smaller decreases in physical/daily living and psychosocial needs in the immediate post-chemotherapy period. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability
    K. L. Haywood
    J. Brett
    E. Tutton
    S. Staniszewska
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 799 - 812
  • [42] Statistical process control assessed implementation fidelity of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine care
    Roberts, Natasha A.
    Alexander, Kimberly
    Wyld, David
    Janda, Monika
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 127 : 76 - 86
  • [43] The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a descriptive literature survey
    Ben Bouazza, Youssef
    Meerbeeck, Jan P. Van
    TRANSLATIONAL LUNG CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (05) : 507 - +
  • [44] Systematic review and meta-analysis of patient reported outcomes for nurse-led models of survivorship care for adult cancer patients
    Monterosso, Leanne
    Platt, Violet
    Bulsara, Max
    Berg, Melissa
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 73 : 62 - 72
  • [45] Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment in inpatient cancer care: a feasibility study
    Salm, Hanna
    Hentschel, Leopold
    Eichler, Martin
    Pink, Daniel
    Fuhrmann, Stephan
    Kramer, Michael
    Reichardt, Peter
    Schuler, Markus K.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2023, 31 (10)
  • [46] Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures into health care for men with localized prostate cancer
    Singhal, Udit
    Skolarus, Ted A.
    Gore, John L.
    Parry, Matthew G.
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Nossiter, Julie
    Paniagua-Cruz, Alan
    George, Arvin K.
    Cathcart, Paul
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Wittmann, Daniela A.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2022, 19 (05) : 263 - 279
  • [47] Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use as Performance Metrics in Adolescent and Young Adult Psychosocial Cancer Care
    Rae, Charlene S.
    Tsangaris, Elena
    Klassen, Anne F.
    Breakey, Vicky
    D'Agostino, Norma
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 262 - 270
  • [48] Mental health and neurodevelopmental patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for children and young people with epilepsy: A systematic review
    De Aveiro, Bianca
    Winsor, Alice
    Davies, Jessica
    Nicholson, Timothy R.
    Pal, Deb K.
    Richardson, Mark P.
    Pick, Susannah
    EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR, 2024, 153
  • [49] Feasibility of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Tool for Screening Distress and Supportive Care Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer
    Hirayama, Takatoshi
    Ishiki, Hiroto
    Yanai, Yuko
    Horiguchi, Saki
    Sugisawa, Akiko
    Sato, Jun
    Kojima, Ryugo
    Sato, Kaori
    Mizuta, Tomoko
    Kojima, Rebekah
    Udagawa, Ryoko
    Kojima, Yuki
    Satomi, Eriko
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13 (01) : 138 - 146
  • [50] Using patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine head and neck cancer care: What do health professionals perceive as barriers and facilitators?
    Nguyen, Hanh
    Butow, Phyllis
    Dhillon, Haryana
    Morris, Lucinda
    Brown, Alison
    West, Katrina
    Sundaresan, Puma
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2020, 64 (05) : 704 - 710