Feasibility and acceptability of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the delivery of nurse-led supportive care to people with colorectal cancer

被引:30
|
作者
Kotronoulas, Grigorios [1 ]
Papadopoulou, Constantina [2 ]
MacNicol, Lorna [3 ]
Simpson, Mhairi [3 ]
Maguire, Roma [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp & Informat Sci, Livingstone Wer LT14-11,26 Richmond St, Glasgow G1 1XH, Lanark, Scotland
[2] Univ West Scotland, Sch Hlth Nursing & Midwifery, Paisley, Renfrew, Scotland
[3] NHS Lanarkshire, Wishaw Gen Hosp, Bothwell, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
Patient-reported outcome measures; Unmet needs; Supportive care; Colorectal cancer; Cancer nurse specialist; Feasibility; Acceptability; Nurse led; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UNMET NEEDS; SURVIVORS; INTERVENTION; PREFERENCES; VALIDATION; DISTRESS; CONNECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Logistical issues pertinent to the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) by colorectal cancer nurse specialists (CNS) to identify the needs of people with colorectal cancer (CRC) in acute care remain unknown. We explored the feasibility and acceptability of PROMs-driven, CNS-led consultations to enhance delivery of supportive care to people with CRC completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A systematic literature review and focus groups with patients and CNS (Phase 1) were followed by a repeated-measures, exploratory study (Phase 2), whereby pre-consultation PROM data were collected during three consecutive, monthly consultations, and used by the CNS to enable delivery of personalised supportive care. Results: Based on Phase 1 data, the Supportive Care Needs Survey was selected for use in Phase 2. Fourteen patients were recruited (recruitment rate: 56%); thirteen (93%) completed all study assessments. Forty in-clinic patient-clinician consultations took place. At baseline, 219 unmet needs were reported in total, with a notable 21% (T2) and 32% (T3) over-time reduction. Physical/daily living and psychological domain scores declined from T1 to T3, yet not statistically significantly. In exit interviews, patients described how using the PROM helped them shortlist and prioritise their needs. CNS stressed how the PROM helped them tease out more issues with patients than they would normally. Conclusions: Nurse-led, PROMs-driven needs assessments with patients with CRC appear to be feasible and acceptable in clinical practice, possibly associated with a sizeable reduction in the frequency of unmet needs, and smaller decreases in physical/daily living and psychosocial needs in the immediate post-chemotherapy period. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 124
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    S. Ishaque
    J. Karnon
    G. Chen
    R. Nair
    A. B. Salter
    Quality of Life Research, 2019, 28 : 567 - 592
  • [22] A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
    Ishaque, S.
    Karnon, J.
    Chen, G.
    Nair, R.
    Salter, A. B.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (03) : 567 - 592
  • [23] Incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) into a clinical quality registry (CQR) for ovarian cancer: considerations and challenges
    Lefkovits, Yael R.
    Heriot, Natalie
    Sporik, Alice
    Perera, Sharnel
    Friedlander, Michael
    Dixon, Cyril
    Cohen, Paul A.
    Lee, Yeh Chen
    Hyde, Simon
    Richardson, Gary
    Webb, Penelope
    Rome, Robert
    King, Madeleine
    Zalcberg, John
    Schofield, Penelope
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Patient outcomes, patient experiences and process indicators associated with the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in cancer care: a systematic review
    Caitlin Graupner
    Merel L. Kimman
    Suzanne Mul
    Annerika H. M. Slok
    Danny Claessens
    Jos Kleijnen
    Carmen D. Dirksen
    Stéphanie O. Breukink
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 573 - 593
  • [25] Feasibility, use and benefits of patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care units: a multicentre observational study
    Mueller, Evelyn
    Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
    Gencer, Deniz
    Kessler, Jens
    Alt-Epping, Bernd
    Schoensteiner, Stefan
    Jaeger, Helga
    Coune, Bettina
    Elster, Luise
    Keser, Muhammet
    Rauser, Julia
    Marquardt, Susanne
    Becker, Gerhild
    BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [26] Endocrinologists' use of patient-reported outcome measures in the care of people with diabetes: A qualitative study
    Nielsen, B. K.
    Terkildsen, M. D.
    Jensen, A. L.
    Pedersen, M. Z.
    Hollesen, M. R.
    Lomborg, K.
    DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 12
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROM) in colorectal cancer surgery
    Pena, Romina
    Pascual, Marta
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2024, 102 (12): : 669 - 671
  • [28] Patient-reported unmet supportive care needs in long-term colorectal cancer survivors after curative treatment in an Asian population
    Lin, Wenjie
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Zhao, Yun
    Seow-En, Isaac
    Chok, Aik Yong
    Tan, Emile Kwong Wei
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (01) : 256 - 262
  • [29] Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review
    van Egdom, Laurentine S. E.
    Oemrawsingh, Arvind
    Verweij, Lisanne M.
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    Hazelzet, Jan A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 (10) : 1197 - 1226
  • [30] Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance
    Gomes, Manuel
    Gutacker, Nils
    Bojke, Chris
    Street, Andrew
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 (05) : 515 - 528