Visibility of small peripheral lung cancers on chest radiographs: influence of densitometric parameters, CT values and tumour type

被引:14
作者
Yang, ZG
Sone, S
Li, F
Takashima, S
Maruyama, Y
Honda, T
Hasegawa, M
机构
[1] Shinshu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Matsumoto, Nagano 3908621, Japan
[2] Shinshu Univ, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med, Matsumoto, Nagano 3908621, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr.74.877.740032
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of tumour density and tumour type on the visibility of small peripheral lung cancers on chest radiographs. We retrospectively evaluated the visibility of 63 small (less than or equal to 20 mm) peripheral lung cancers on chest radiographs. 48 (76%) were detected in our low dose CT screening for lung cancer and 15 (24%) in routine clinical examination. Analysis was based on tumour optical contrast, gradient at the tumour margin, CT values and tumour type. There were 31 (49%) visible cancers and 32 (51%) invisible cancers on chest radiographs. Visible tumours had an optical density of 0.1-0.3 OD and a gradient of 0.03-0.11 OD mm(-1). The mean size of visible tumour (14.3 mm) was larger than that of invisible tumour (11.1 mm; p <0.001). The mean CT value (-140 HU) of visible tumour was higher than that of invisible tumour (-490 HU; p <0.001). The detection rates of adenocarcinomas with lepidic growth (0% for type A, 29% for type B and 68% for type C) were less than those with hilic growth (100% for types D-F). All squamous and small cell carcinomas with hilic growth were visible on chest radiographs, but the numbers of each were small. In summary, tumour type influenced the contrast, gradient, CT values and margin of the tumour. Small adenocarcinomas with a lepidic tumour growth were less well seen on chest radiographs compared with small lung cancers with hilic tumour growth.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 41
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] MISSED BRONCHOGENIC-CARCINOMA - RADIOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN 27 PATIENTS WITH A POTENTIALLY RESECTABLE LESION EVIDENT IN RETROSPECT
    AUSTIN, JHM
    ROMNEY, BM
    GOLDSMITH, LS
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [2] BROGDON BG, 1983, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V21, P633
  • [3] Pulmonary nodules: Experimental and clinical studies at low-dose CT
    Diederich, S
    Lenzen, H
    Windmann, R
    Puskas, Z
    Yelbuz, TM
    Henneken, S
    Klaiber, T
    Eameri, M
    Roos, N
    Peters, PE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213 (01) : 289 - 298
  • [4] DEPTH RESOLUTION - MECHANISM BY WHICH HIGH KILOVOLTAGE IMPROVES VISIBILITY IN CHEST FILMS
    DYKE, WP
    BARBOUR, JP
    CHARBONNIER, FM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1975, 117 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [5] PATHWAYS OF TUMOR SPREAD THROUGH THE LUNG - RADIOLOGIC CORRELATIONS WITH ANATOMY AND PATHOLOGY
    HEITZMAN, ER
    MARKARIAN, B
    RAASCH, BN
    CARSKY, EW
    LANE, EJ
    BERLOW, ME
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 144 (01) : 3 - 14
  • [6] Early Lung Cancer Action Project: overall design and findings from baseline screening
    Henschke, CI
    McCauley, DI
    Yankelevitz, DF
    Naidich, DP
    McGuinness, G
    Miettinen, OS
    Libby, DM
    Pasmantier, MW
    Koizumi, J
    Altorki, NK
    Smith, JP
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9173) : 99 - 105
  • [7] Peripheral lung cancer: Screening and detection with low-dose spiral CT versus radiography
    Kaneko, M
    Eguchi, K
    Ohmatsu, H
    Kakinuma, R
    Naruke, T
    Suemasu, K
    Moriyama, N
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (03) : 798 - 802
  • [8] CONTRAST GRADIENT AND THE DETECTION OF LUNG NODULES
    KUNDEL, HL
    REVESZ, G
    TOTO, L
    [J]. INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1979, 14 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [9] NOGUCHI M, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V75, P2844, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950615)75:12<2844::AID-CNCR2820751209>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-#