Pressure-relieving equipment: promoting its correct use amongst nurses via differing modes of educational delivery

被引:8
作者
Wedge, C
Gosney, M
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Sch Hlth Sci, Liverpool L69 3GB, Merseyside, England
[2] Royal Liverpool & Broadgreen Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Reading, Sch Food Biosci, Reading RG6 2AH, Berks, England
[4] Royal Berkshire & Battle Hosp NHS Trust, Reading, Berks, England
关键词
beds; education; nurses; nursing; pressure ulcers; research delivery;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01082.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. To examine the impact of written and verbal education on bed-making practices, in an attempt to reduce the prevalence of pressure ulcers. Background. The Department of Health has set targets for a 5% reduction per annum in the incidence of pressure ulcers. Electric profiling beds with a visco-elastic polymer mattress are a new innovation in pressure ulcer prevention; however, mattress efficacy is reduced by tightly tucking sheets around the mattress. Design. A prospective randomized pre/post-test experimental design. Methods. Ward managers at a teaching hospital were approached to participate in the study. Two researchers independently examined the tightness of the sheets around the mattresses. Wards were randomized to one of two groups. Groups A and B received written education. In addition, group B received verbal education on alternate days for one week. Beds were re-examined one month later. One researcher was blinded to the educational delivery received by the wards. Results. Twelve wards agreed to participate in the study and 245 beds were examined. Before education, 113 beds (46%) had sheets tucked correctly around the mattresses. Following education, this increased to 215 beds (87.8%) (chi(2) = 68.03, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of correctly made beds between the two different education groups: 100 (87.72%) beds correctly made in group A vs. 115 (87.79%) beds in group B (chi(2) = 0, P 0.987). Conclusions. Clear, concise written instruction improved practice but verbal education was not additionally beneficial. Relevance to clinical practice. Nurses are receptive to clear, concise written evidence regarding pressure ulcer prevention and incorporate this into clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:473 / 478
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   INTERPRETATION OF PRESSURE-SORE PREVALENCE [J].
ALLCOCK, N ;
WHARRAD, H ;
NICOLSON, A .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1994, 20 (01) :37-45
[2]  
ANTHONY DM, 1996, J WOUND CARE, V8, P63
[3]  
Bliss M R, 1998, J Tissue Viability, V8, P4
[4]  
BROWN GD, 1995, J ADV NURS, V21, P154, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21010154.x
[5]  
Collier M, 1999, J Wound Care, V8, P63
[6]   THE SIZE OF THE PRESSURE-SORE PROBLEM IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL [J].
DEALEY, C .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 1991, 16 (06) :663-670
[7]  
*EUR PRESS ULC ADV, 1997, LANCET, V349, P262
[8]  
Funk S G, 1991, Appl Nurs Res, V4, P39
[9]  
Gebhardt Krzysztof, 2002, Nurs Times, V98, P41
[10]  
Gruber Todd, 2003, Am J Hosp Palliat Care, V20, P231, DOI 10.1177/104990910302000314