Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for advanced gastric cancer with the first-line chemotherapy

被引:13
|
作者
Sun, Zhiwei [1 ]
Jia, Jun [1 ]
Du, Feng [1 ]
Yang, Ying [1 ]
Liu, Chuanling [1 ]
Xiao, Yanjie [1 ]
Yu, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, VIP II Div Med Dept, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Minist Educ,Canc Hosp & Inst, 52 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; tumor marker; chemotherapy; PREOPERATIVE CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CA; 72-4; CEA; CA-19-9; CA19-9; CA125; METASTASIS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21037/tcr.2019.10.27
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Tumor markers play an important role in the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostic prediction of cancers. But the predictive value of serum tumor markers in gastric cancer is still unclear. Methods: In this study, we detected serum levels of tumor markers to evaluate their relation to treatment response and prognosis in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Results: We collected the clinical data of 109 patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who had received the first-line chemotherapy in Peking University Cancer Hospital from July 2013 to May 2015, and collected the value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), carbohydrate antigen 72.4 (CA72.4) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) before and after chemotherapy. At diagnosis, the positive rates of CEA, CA199, CA72.4 and CA125 were 46.8%, 40.2%, 53.5% and 35.0%, respectively. And the positive rate of combined detection of the four markers was 87.2%. Although patients with prechemotherapy CA199 >= 80 U/mL (92.3% vs. 68.5%, P=0.016) or CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL (91.4% vs. 62.5%, P=0.003) had higher clinical benefit rate after chemotherapy, they showed poorer prognosis (P=0.023 and P=0.006, respectively). CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor (Hazard Ratio 4.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.910-12.262; P=0.001). In patients with increased levels of tumor markers before treatment, the levels of tumor markers decreased after chemotherapy, especially in those with clinical benefit (CEA, CA72.4 reached statistical significance, P=0.013 and P=0.029, respectively). A decrease of CEA >= 35%, CA199 >= 30%, or CA72.4 >= 40% after chemotherapy had positive prediction value for the response to chemotherapy (P=0.016, P=0.029, and P=0.008, respectively). Conclusions: The results showed that both high pre-chemotherapy serum levels of tumor markers (CA199 >= 80 U/mL or CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL) and a substantial decrease in tumor markers after chemotherapy (CEA >= 35%, CA199 >= 0%, or CA72.4 >= 40%) could predict a higher clinical benefit rate in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. However, this advantage in short-term response to chemotherapy failed to convert into prolonged survival benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:2680 / 2690
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The prognostic value of serum and immunohistochemical tumour markers in advanced gastric cancer
    Webb, A
    ScottMackie, P
    Cunningham, D
    Norman, A
    Andreyev, J
    OBrien, M
    Bensted, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (01) : 63 - 68
  • [22] Pharmacogenetic Angiogenesis Profiling for First-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer
    Su Dan
    Li Bai
    Wang Li-Jie
    Zhang Ting
    Mao Zhi-Yuan
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2013, 31 (06) : 390 - 396
  • [23] Value of joint detection of serum TK-1 and tumor markers in gastric cancer screening
    Zhen, Shuanping
    Gao, Ziying
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2019, 12 (08): : 10294 - 10301
  • [24] Clinical significance of preoperative serum tumor markers in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Zhao, Hongguang
    Chen, Wenhu
    Wu, Jie
    Wang, Lifang
    Mao, Weimin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 10 (07) : C179 - C185
  • [25] Dynamic monitoring of serum tumor markers as prognostic factors in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line immunotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study
    Yang, Xiongwen
    Xiao, Yi
    Zhou, Yubin
    Deng, Huiyin
    Yuan, Zihao
    Dong, Longyan
    Lan, Jun
    Hu, Hao
    Huang, Jian
    Huang, Shaohong
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 15
  • [26] Prognostic Significance of Disease Control at 12 Weeks in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving FOLFIRINOX as First-line Chemotherapy
    Batra, Atul
    Tang, Patricia A.
    Cheung, Winson Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2021, 44 (10): : 519 - 525
  • [27] Evaluation of the Clinical Significance of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Patients with Resectable Gastric Adenocarcinoma
    Dang, Yuan
    Ouyang, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Kai
    Zhang, Fan
    Huang, Qiaojia
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (03) : 196 - 199
  • [28] A Prognostic Model to Predict Clinical Outcomes with First-Line Gemcitabine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Yi, Jun Ho
    Lee, Jeeyun
    Park, Se Hoon
    Lee, Kyu Taek
    Lee, Jong Kyun
    Lee, Kwang Hyuck
    Choi, Dong Wook
    Choi, Seong-Ho
    Heo, Jin-Seok
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Park, Young Suk
    Lim, Ho Yeong
    Kang, Won Ki
    Park, Keunchil
    Park, Joon Oh
    ONCOLOGY, 2011, 80 (3-4) : 175 - 180
  • [29] Paclitaxel combined with oxaliplatin as first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer
    Shi, Chunmei
    Chen, Qiang
    Shen, Songfei
    Wu, Riping
    Yang, Baoyu
    Liu, Qing
    Xu, Qian
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (05) : 595 - 601
  • [30] Clinical evaluation of carcinoembryonic and carbohydrate antigens as cancer biomarkers to monitor palliative chemotherapy in advanced stage gastric cancer
    Abbas, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Abrar
    Khan, Ghulam Jilany
    Baig, Mirza Muhammad Faran Ashraf
    Naveed, Muhammad
    Mikrani, Reyaj
    Cao, Tengli
    Naeem, Shagufta
    Shi, Meiqi
    Chen Dingding
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER, 2019, 43 (01) : 5 - 17