Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for advanced gastric cancer with the first-line chemotherapy

被引:15
作者
Sun, Zhiwei [1 ]
Jia, Jun [1 ]
Du, Feng [1 ]
Yang, Ying [1 ]
Liu, Chuanling [1 ]
Xiao, Yanjie [1 ]
Yu, Jing [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, VIP II Div Med Dept, Key Lab Carcinogenesis & Translat Res, Minist Educ,Canc Hosp & Inst, 52 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100142, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; tumor marker; chemotherapy; PREOPERATIVE CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; CA; 72-4; CEA; CA-19-9; CA19-9; CA125; METASTASIS; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.21037/tcr.2019.10.27
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Tumor markers play an important role in the diagnosis, monitoring and prognostic prediction of cancers. But the predictive value of serum tumor markers in gastric cancer is still unclear. Methods: In this study, we detected serum levels of tumor markers to evaluate their relation to treatment response and prognosis in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Results: We collected the clinical data of 109 patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who had received the first-line chemotherapy in Peking University Cancer Hospital from July 2013 to May 2015, and collected the value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), carbohydrate antigen 72.4 (CA72.4) and carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) before and after chemotherapy. At diagnosis, the positive rates of CEA, CA199, CA72.4 and CA125 were 46.8%, 40.2%, 53.5% and 35.0%, respectively. And the positive rate of combined detection of the four markers was 87.2%. Although patients with prechemotherapy CA199 >= 80 U/mL (92.3% vs. 68.5%, P=0.016) or CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL (91.4% vs. 62.5%, P=0.003) had higher clinical benefit rate after chemotherapy, they showed poorer prognosis (P=0.023 and P=0.006, respectively). CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor (Hazard Ratio 4.84; 95% confidence interval: 1.910-12.262; P=0.001). In patients with increased levels of tumor markers before treatment, the levels of tumor markers decreased after chemotherapy, especially in those with clinical benefit (CEA, CA72.4 reached statistical significance, P=0.013 and P=0.029, respectively). A decrease of CEA >= 35%, CA199 >= 30%, or CA72.4 >= 40% after chemotherapy had positive prediction value for the response to chemotherapy (P=0.016, P=0.029, and P=0.008, respectively). Conclusions: The results showed that both high pre-chemotherapy serum levels of tumor markers (CA199 >= 80 U/mL or CA72.4 >= 20 U/mL) and a substantial decrease in tumor markers after chemotherapy (CEA >= 35%, CA199 >= 0%, or CA72.4 >= 40%) could predict a higher clinical benefit rate in patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. However, this advantage in short-term response to chemotherapy failed to convert into prolonged survival benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:2680 / 2690
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]   Tumor Response Evaluation in Oncology: Current Update [J].
Shanbhogue, Alampady Krishna Prasad ;
Karnad, Anand B. ;
Prasad, Srinivasa R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2010, 34 (04) :479-484
[22]   Tumor markers in clinical practice: General principles and guidelines [J].
Sharma, S. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) :1-8
[23]   Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association [J].
Shimada, Hideaki ;
Noie, Tamaki ;
Ohashi, Manabu ;
Oba, Koji ;
Takahashi, Yutaka .
GASTRIC CANCER, 2014, 17 (01) :26-33
[24]   Clinicopathologic and Prognostic Value of Serum Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Song, Yong-xi ;
Huang, Xuan-zhang ;
Gao, Peng ;
Sun, Jing-xu ;
Chen, Xiao-wan ;
Yang, Yu-chong ;
Zhang, Cong ;
Liu, Hong-peng ;
Wang, Hong-chi ;
Wang, Zhen-ning .
DISEASE MARKERS, 2015, 2015
[25]   Predictive Factors for the Benefit of Perioperative FOLFOX for Resectable Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer Patients (EORTC Intergroup Trial 40983) [J].
Sorbye, Halfdan ;
Mauer, Murielle ;
Gruenberger, Thomas ;
Glimelius, Bengt ;
Poston, Graeme J. ;
Schlag, Peter M. ;
Rougier, Philippe ;
Bechstein, Wolf O. ;
Primrose, John N. ;
Walpole, Euan T. ;
Finch-Jones, Meg ;
Jaeck, Daniel ;
Mirza, Darius ;
Parks, Rowan W. ;
Collette, Laurence ;
Van Cutsem, Eric ;
Scheithauer, Werner ;
Lutz, Manfred P. ;
Nordlinger, Bernard .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2012, 255 (03) :534-539
[26]   Clinical evaluation of CEA, CA19-9, CA72-4 and CA125 in gastric cancer patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Sun, Zhipeng ;
Zhang, Nengwei .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 12
[27]   Serum carcinoembryonic antigen as a prognostic factor in resectable gastric cancer [J].
Tachibana, M ;
Takemoto, Y ;
Nakashima, Y ;
Kinugasa, S ;
Kotoh, T ;
Dhar, D ;
Kohno, H ;
Nagasue, N .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 187 (01) :64-68
[28]  
Therasse P, 2000, J NATL CANCER I, V92, P205, DOI 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205
[29]   Combined Detection of CEA, CA 19-9, CA 242 and CA 50 in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Resectable Gastric Cancer [J].
Tian, Shu-Bo ;
Yu, Jian-Chun ;
Kang, Wei-Ming ;
Ma, Zhi-Qiang ;
Ye, Xin ;
Cao, Zhan-Jiang ;
Yan, Chao .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (15) :6295-6300
[30]   Predictive Role of the Number of 18F-FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes Detected by PET/CT for Pre-Treatment Evaluation of Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer [J].
Wang, Xin ;
Wei, Yuzhe ;
Xue, Yingwei ;
Lu, Peiou ;
Yu, Lijuan ;
Shen, Baozhong .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12)