Disclosures of Huntington disease risk within families: Patterns of decision-making and implications

被引:37
|
作者
Klitzman, Robert
Thorne, Deborah
Williamson, Jennifer
Chung, Wendy
Marder, Karen
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Neurol Psychiat, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Gertrude H Sergievsky Ctr, Dept Neurol, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & surg, Dept Pediat, New York, NY 10027 USA
[6] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & surg, Dept Med, New York, NY 10027 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Taub Inst Alzheimers Dis & Aging Brain, Gertrude H Sergievsky Ctr, Coll Phys & Surg,Dept Neurol Psychiat, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
Huntington disease; genetics; disclosure; families; secrets; privacy/confidentiality; stigma; ethics; decision-making; genetic discrimination; children; kinship;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.31864
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Patterns of disclosure of Huntington disease risk and genetic test results among family members are important, but have been underexplored. We interviewed 21 individuals indepth-eight mutation-positive for HD, four mutationnegative, and nine not tested-for 2 hr each. Within families, critical questions arose of what, when, and to whom to disclose, and what to do post-disclosure. Interviewees wrestled with dilemmas of what to tell (e.g., suspicions vs. confirmed symptoms; initiation vs. completion of testing; partial vs. indirect information), how to disclose (e.g., planning in advance vs. "blurting out" information in arguments), and whether and how to tell extended family members. Questions arose of when to tell (i.e., to avoid disclosing "too early" or "too late"). Similarities and differences emerged related to types of relationships (e.g., parents telling offspring vs. offspring telling parents vs. siblings telling each other). individuals often disclosed because of perceived duty to foster the health of their farnily members, enabling these others to pursue appropriate medical evaluation, if desired. Yet tensions arose because the information could burden these members, who also have rights to remain "in denial" if they wish and not discuss the topic or pursue testing. Post-clisclosure, dilemmas emerged of whether and how much to encourage family members to pursue testing. These data shed important light on critical issues that have received little, if any, attention concerning what, how, and when disclosure occurs, and have key implications for at-risk individuals, genetic Counselors, and other health care workers (HCWs), and for future research. At-risk individuals would benefit from considering these issues in advance. HCWs need to realize that these decisions are multi-faceted. Future research can explore whether, when, how, and how often HCWs raise these issues with individuals. (C)) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1849
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetic risk for Huntington Disease and reproductive decision-making: A systematic review
    Fahy, Neil
    Rice, Charlotte
    Lahiri, Nayana
    Desai, Roopal
    Stott, Joshua
    CLINICAL GENETICS, 2023, 104 (02) : 147 - 162
  • [2] Dissociation between decision-making under risk and decision-making under ambiguity in premanifest and manifest Huntington's disease
    Adjeroud, Najia
    Besnard, Jeremy
    Verny, Christophe
    Prundean, Adriana
    Scherer, Clarisse
    Gohier, Benedicte
    Bonneau, Dominique
    El Massioui, Nicole
    Allain, Philippe
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2017, 103 : 87 - 95
  • [3] Moral Judgment and Decision-Making in Huntington's Disease
    Eddy, Clare M.
    Rickards, High E.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2012, 24 (02) : 15 - 15
  • [4] DECISION-MAKING IN PREDICTIVE TESTING IN HUNTINGTON'S DISEASE
    Terenzi, Federica
    Ferrari, Camilla
    Bartolozzi, Claudio
    Rotella, Francesco
    Ghelli, Elena
    Mascherini, Eleonora
    Volpi, Eleonora
    Latorraca, Stefania
    Bagnoli, Silvia
    Nacmias, Benedetta
    Piacentini, Silvia
    Sorbi, Sandro
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 89 : A66 - A66
  • [5] The usefulness of derivative disclosures for investment decision-making
    Huang, Zhen
    Gao, Simon
    JOURNAL OF CHINESE ECONOMIC AND FOREIGN TRADE STUDIES, 2014, 7 (03) : 173 - 192
  • [6] Environmental risk assessment within a decision-making framework
    McCarty, LS
    Power, M
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 1997, 16 (02) : 122 - 123
  • [7] Factors influencing decision-making in the genetic test for Huntington's disease
    Smith, J. A.
    Quarrel, O.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2006, 21 : 139 - 140
  • [8] Huntington's Disease: Disclosure and Future Decision-Making in Romantic Relationships
    Tsang, Marian
    Smith, Moyra
    Thompson, Leslie
    Hall, Katherine
    NEUROTHERAPEUTICS, 2019, 16 (04) : 1385 - 1385
  • [9] Impulsivity in Huntington's disease: Impaired decision-making and motor disinhibition
    Mclauchlan, D.
    Linden, D.
    Rosser, A.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 29 : S162 - S163
  • [10] The use of risk patterns to support environmental decision-making
    vanHerwijnen, M
    Janssen, R
    GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION - FROM RESEARCH TO APPLICATION THROUGH COOPERATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1996, : 767 - 776