From habits of attrition to modes of inclusion: enhancing the role of private practitioners in routine disease surveillance

被引:14
作者
Phalkey, Revati K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Butsch, Carsten [3 ]
Belesova, Kristine [4 ]
Kroll, Marieke [3 ]
Kraas, Frauke [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Div Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, City Hosp, C111,Clin Sci Bldg 2,Hucknall Rd, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Publ Hlth, Neuenheimer Feld 130-3, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Cologne, Inst Geog, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
[4] LSHTM, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
关键词
Private-practitioners participation; Disease surveillance; Barriers and facilitators; TUBERCULOSIS CASE DETECTION; HEALTH-CARE FACILITIES; IMPROVED TB CONTROL; CHI-MINH-CITY; CASE NOTIFICATION; PUBLIC-HEALTH; MIX; INDIA; SECTOR; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-017-2476-9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Private practitioners are the preferred first point of care in a majority of low and middle-income countries and in this position, best placed for the surveillance of diseases. However their contribution to routine surveillance data is marginal. This systematic review aims to explore evidence with regards to the role, contribution, and involvement of private practitioners in routine disease data notification. We examined the factors that determine the inclusion of, and the participation thereof of private practitioners in disease surveillance activities. Methods: Literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Knowledge, WHOLIS, and WHO-IRIS databases to identify peer-reviewed and gray full-text documents in English with no limits for year of publication or study design. Forty manuscripts were reviewed. Results: The current participation of private practitioners in disease surveillance efforts is appalling. The main barriers to their participation are inadequate knowledge leading to unsatisfactory attitudes and misperceptions that influence their practices. Complicated reporting mechanisms with unclear guidelines, along with unsatisfactory attitudes on behalf of the government and surveillance program managers also contribute to the underreporting of cases. Infrastructural barriers especially the availability of computers and skilled human resources are critical to improving private sector participation in routine disease surveillance. Conclusion: The issues identified are similar to those for underreporting within the Integrated infectious Disease Surveillance and Response systems (IDSR) which collects data mainly from public healthcare facilities. We recommend that surveillance program officers should provide periodic training, supportive supervision and offer regular feedback to the practitioners from both public as well as private sectors in order to improve case notification. Governments need to take leadership and foster collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors and most importantly exercise regulatory authority where needed.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Agarwal R, 2013, MALAYS J MED SCI, V20, P52
[2]  
Ahmadi A, 2013, INT J PREVENTIVE MED, V4, P1036
[3]  
Ambe G, 2005, INT J TUBERC LUNG D, V9, P562
[4]  
[Anonymous], PLOS ONE
[5]  
[Anonymous], NEW DELHI DELOITTE I
[6]  
[Anonymous], BEST PRACT ENG HLTH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GLOB J MED PUBLIC HL
[8]  
[Anonymous], INDIAN J CHEST DIS A
[9]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTN
[10]  
[Anonymous], COUNTR EC CAT