Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer

被引:216
作者
Kweldam, Charlotte F. [1 ]
Wildhagen, Mark F. [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [4 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [3 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. [5 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Res Off Sophia, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY; LESS;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.2014.116
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy demonstrate a wide range in clinical outcome. Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer encompasses a heterogeneous group of tumor growth patterns including fused, ill-defined, cribriform, and glomeruloid glandular structures. Our objective was to determine the prognostic value of different Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. We performed a nested case-control study among 535 patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy, treated between March 1985 and July 2013 at a university hospital in the Netherlands. We analyzed 52 cases (with metastasis, disease-specific mortality or both) and 109 controls, matched for age, PSA level, and pT stage. Presence of the following Gleason grade 4 patterns was recorded: fused, ill-defined, cribriform, and glomeruloid. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and tertiary Gleason grade 5 were additionally assessed. Outcomes were metastasis-free survival and disease-specific survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the predictive value of Gleason grade 4 patterns for survival time. The overall prevalence of Gleason grade 4 patterns was as follows: fused 75% (n=121), ill-defined 64% (n=102), cribriform 48% (n=83), and glomeruloid 25% (n=40). Cribriform pattern was the only pattern with an unequal distribution between cases and controls. Forty-two out of 52 cases (81%) had cribriform growth pattern versus 41/109 controls (38%). In multivariate analysis, presence of cribriform growth was an adverse independent predictor for distant metastasis-free survival (HR 8.0, 95% CI 3.0-21; P<0.001) and disease-specific survival (HR 5.4, 95% Cl 2.0-15, P=0.001). In conclusion, cribriform growth in Gleason grade 4 is a strong prognostic marker for distant metastasis and disease-specific death in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Cohen RJ, 2000, PROSTATE, V43, P11, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000401)43:1<11::AID-PROS3>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-B
  • [3] Cohen RJ, 2007, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V131, P1103
  • [4] Architectural Heterogeneity and Cribriform Pattern Predict Adverse Clinical Outcome for Gleason Grade 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
    Dong, Fei
    Yang, Ping
    Wang, Chaofu
    Wu, Shulin
    Xiao, Yu
    McDougal, W. Scott
    Young, Robert H.
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 37 (12) : 1855 - 1861
  • [5] Morphologic Characterization of Preoperatively Treated Prostate Cancer: Toward a Post-Therapy Histologic Classification
    Efstathiou, Eleni
    Abrahams, Neil A.
    Tibbs, Rita F.
    Wang, Xuemei
    Pettaway, Curtis A.
    Pisters, Louis L.
    Mathew, Paul F.
    Do, Kim-Anh
    Logothetis, Christopher J.
    Troncoso, Patricia
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 1030 - 1038
  • [6] Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Han, Misop
    Partin, Alan W.
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Wood, David P.
    Eastham, James A.
    Yossepowitch, Ofer
    Rabah, Danny M.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Yu, Changhong
    Klein, Eric A.
    Stephenson, Andrew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) : 869 - 875
  • [7] The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma
    Epstein, JI
    Allsbrook, WC
    Amin, MB
    Egevad, LL
    Bastacky, S
    Beltrán, AL
    Berner, A
    Billis, A
    Boccon-Gibod, L
    Cheng, L
    Civantos, F
    Cohen, C
    Cohen, MB
    Datta, M
    Davis, C
    Delahunt, B
    Delprado, W
    Eble, JN
    Foster, CS
    Furusato, M
    Gaudin, PB
    Grignon, DJ
    Humphrey, PA
    Iczkowski, KA
    Jones, EC
    Lucia, S
    McCue, PA
    Nazeer, T
    Oliva, E
    Pan, CC
    Pizov, G
    Reuter, V
    Samaratunga, H
    Sebo, T
    Sesterhenn, I
    Shevchuk, M
    Srigley, JR
    Suzigan, S
    Takahashi, H
    Tamboli, P
    Tan, PH
    Têtu, B
    Tickoo, S
    Tomaszewski, JE
    Troncoso, P
    Tsuzuki, T
    True, LD
    van der Kwast, T
    Wheeler, TM
    Wojno, KJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) : 1228 - 1242
  • [8] Epstein Jonathan I, 2011, Ann Pathol, V31, pS20, DOI 10.1016/j.annpat.2011.08.023
  • [9] Prostate Cancer Staging and Grading at Radical Prostatectomy Over Time
    Falzarano, Sara Moscovita
    Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) : 159 - 164
  • [10] HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A PERSPECTIVE
    GLEASON, DF
    [J]. HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) : 273 - 279