Cribriform growth is highly predictive for postoperative metastasis and disease-specific death in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer

被引:222
作者
Kweldam, Charlotte F. [1 ]
Wildhagen, Mark F. [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [4 ]
Bangma, Chris H. [3 ]
van der Kwast, Theodorus H. [5 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Res Off Sophia, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus MC, Ctr Med Decis Making, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY; BIOPSY; LESS;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.2014.116
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on radical prostatectomy demonstrate a wide range in clinical outcome. Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer encompasses a heterogeneous group of tumor growth patterns including fused, ill-defined, cribriform, and glomeruloid glandular structures. Our objective was to determine the prognostic value of different Gleason grade 4 growth patterns. We performed a nested case-control study among 535 patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy, treated between March 1985 and July 2013 at a university hospital in the Netherlands. We analyzed 52 cases (with metastasis, disease-specific mortality or both) and 109 controls, matched for age, PSA level, and pT stage. Presence of the following Gleason grade 4 patterns was recorded: fused, ill-defined, cribriform, and glomeruloid. Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate and tertiary Gleason grade 5 were additionally assessed. Outcomes were metastasis-free survival and disease-specific survival. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the predictive value of Gleason grade 4 patterns for survival time. The overall prevalence of Gleason grade 4 patterns was as follows: fused 75% (n=121), ill-defined 64% (n=102), cribriform 48% (n=83), and glomeruloid 25% (n=40). Cribriform pattern was the only pattern with an unequal distribution between cases and controls. Forty-two out of 52 cases (81%) had cribriform growth pattern versus 41/109 controls (38%). In multivariate analysis, presence of cribriform growth was an adverse independent predictor for distant metastasis-free survival (HR 8.0, 95% CI 3.0-21; P<0.001) and disease-specific survival (HR 5.4, 95% Cl 2.0-15, P=0.001). In conclusion, cribriform growth in Gleason grade 4 is a strong prognostic marker for distant metastasis and disease-specific death in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Cohen RJ, 2000, PROSTATE, V43, P11, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000401)43:1<11::AID-PROS3>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-B
[3]  
Cohen RJ, 2007, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V131, P1103
[4]   Architectural Heterogeneity and Cribriform Pattern Predict Adverse Clinical Outcome for Gleason Grade 4 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma [J].
Dong, Fei ;
Yang, Ping ;
Wang, Chaofu ;
Wu, Shulin ;
Xiao, Yu ;
McDougal, W. Scott ;
Young, Robert H. ;
Wu, Chin-Lee .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2013, 37 (12) :1855-1861
[5]   Morphologic Characterization of Preoperatively Treated Prostate Cancer: Toward a Post-Therapy Histologic Classification [J].
Efstathiou, Eleni ;
Abrahams, Neil A. ;
Tibbs, Rita F. ;
Wang, Xuemei ;
Pettaway, Curtis A. ;
Pisters, Louis L. ;
Mathew, Paul F. ;
Do, Kim-Anh ;
Logothetis, Christopher J. ;
Troncoso, Patricia .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) :1030-1038
[6]   Predicting 15-Year Prostate Cancer Specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy [J].
Eggener, Scott E. ;
Scardino, Peter T. ;
Walsh, Patrick C. ;
Han, Misop ;
Partin, Alan W. ;
Trock, Bruce J. ;
Feng, Zhaoyong ;
Wood, David P. ;
Eastham, James A. ;
Yossepowitch, Ofer ;
Rabah, Danny M. ;
Kattan, Michael W. ;
Yu, Changhong ;
Klein, Eric A. ;
Stephenson, Andrew J. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (03) :869-875
[7]   The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma [J].
Epstein, JI ;
Allsbrook, WC ;
Amin, MB ;
Egevad, LL ;
Bastacky, S ;
Beltrán, AL ;
Berner, A ;
Billis, A ;
Boccon-Gibod, L ;
Cheng, L ;
Civantos, F ;
Cohen, C ;
Cohen, MB ;
Datta, M ;
Davis, C ;
Delahunt, B ;
Delprado, W ;
Eble, JN ;
Foster, CS ;
Furusato, M ;
Gaudin, PB ;
Grignon, DJ ;
Humphrey, PA ;
Iczkowski, KA ;
Jones, EC ;
Lucia, S ;
McCue, PA ;
Nazeer, T ;
Oliva, E ;
Pan, CC ;
Pizov, G ;
Reuter, V ;
Samaratunga, H ;
Sebo, T ;
Sesterhenn, I ;
Shevchuk, M ;
Srigley, JR ;
Suzigan, S ;
Takahashi, H ;
Tamboli, P ;
Tan, PH ;
Têtu, B ;
Tickoo, S ;
Tomaszewski, JE ;
Troncoso, P ;
Tsuzuki, T ;
True, LD ;
van der Kwast, T ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Wojno, KJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2005, 29 (09) :1228-1242
[8]  
Epstein Jonathan I, 2011, Ann Pathol, V31, pS20, DOI 10.1016/j.annpat.2011.08.023
[9]   Prostate Cancer Staging and Grading at Radical Prostatectomy Over Time [J].
Falzarano, Sara Moscovita ;
Magi-Galluzzi, Cristina .
ADVANCES IN ANATOMIC PATHOLOGY, 2011, 18 (02) :159-164
[10]   HISTOLOGIC GRADING OF PROSTATE-CANCER - A PERSPECTIVE [J].
GLEASON, DF .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (03) :273-279