Quantitative differences in HTLV-I antibody responses: classification and relative risk assessment for asymptomatic carriers and ATL and HAM/TSP patients from Jamaica

被引:29
作者
Enose-Akahata, Yoshimi [1 ]
Abrams, Anna [1 ]
Johnson, Kory R. [2 ]
Maloney, Elizabeth M. [3 ]
Jacobson, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, Viral Immunol Sect, Neuroimmunol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NINDS, Informat Technol & Bioinformat Program, Div Intramural Res, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] US FDA, Div Epidemiol 2, Off Surveillance & Epidemiol, Silver Spring, MD USA
关键词
VIRUS TYPE-I; T-CELL LEUKEMIA; MYELOPATHY/TROPICAL SPASTIC PARAPARESIS; PROVIRAL DNA LOAD; PERIPHERAL-BLOOD; NATURAL-HISTORY; LEUKEMIA/LYMPHOMA; DISEASE; LYMPHOCYTES; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1182/blood-2011-11-390807
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Adult T-cell leukemia (ATL) and human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I)associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis (HAM/TSP) are known to be caused by HTLV-I infection. However, current methods used to determine HTLV-I infection do not differentiate between HTLV-I asymptomatic carriers (ACs) and ATL and HAM/TSP patients. Using the luciferase immunoprecipitation system, a highly sensitive, quantitative technology that can efficiently detect HTLV-I Ab responses, we examined Ab responses for HTLV-I in serum/plasma samples from 439 subjects in Jamaica, including HTLVI- seronegative donors, ACs, and ATL and HAM/TSP patients. The Ab responses of HTLV-I-infected subjects differed significantly from those of seronegative donors for all 3 immunodominant proteins, Gag, Env, and Tax. HAM/TSP patients had significantly higher Ab responses for Gag and Env compared with ACs, and Ab responses for all 3 Ags were higher in HAM/TSP patients than in ATL patients. Moreover, immunoreactivities for HTLV-I Ags as determined by the luciferase immunoprecipitation system could distinguish HAM/TSP patients from ACs at a true-positive rate of 85.42% and from ATL patients at a true-positive rate of 75.00%, and modeled in conjunction with subject information to distinguish HAM/TSP patients from ACs (odds ratio=14.12) and from ATL patients (odds ratio=7.00). The relative risk assessment resulting from these significant differences between Ab responses in HTLVI-infected groups may be a useful diagnostic tool in the future. (Blood. 2012; 119(12): 2829-2836)
引用
收藏
页码:2829 / 2836
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Performance of IgG and IgG1 anti-HTLV-1 reactivity by an indirect immunofluorescence flow cytometric assay for the identification of persons infected with HTLV-1, asymptomatic carriers and patients with myelopathy [J].
Alves Coelho-dos-Reis, Jordana Grazziela ;
Martins-Filho, Olindo Assis ;
Alvim de Brito-Melo, Gustavo Eustaquio ;
Gallego, Sandra ;
Carneiro-Proietti, Anna Barbara ;
Souza, Jaqueline Gontijo ;
Barbosa-Stancioli, Edel Figueiredo .
JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2009, 160 (1-2) :138-148
[2]   Loss of the ex vivo but not the reinducible CD8+ T-cell response to Tax in human T-cell leukemia virus type 1-infected patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma [J].
Arnulf, B ;
Thorel, M ;
Poirot, Y ;
Tamouza, R ;
Boulanger, E ;
Jaccard, A ;
Oksenhendler, E ;
Hermine, O ;
Pique, C .
LEUKEMIA, 2004, 18 (01) :126-132
[3]   LIPS arrays for simultaneous detection of antibodies against partial and whole proteomes of HCV, HIV and EBV [J].
Burbelo, Peter D. ;
Bren, Kathleen E. ;
Ching, Kathryn H. ;
Gogineni, Emile S. ;
Kottilil, Shyam ;
Cohen, Jeffrey I. ;
Kovacs, Joseph A. ;
Iadarola, Michael J. .
MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS, 2011, 7 (05) :1453-1462
[4]   Antibody-profiling technologies for studying humoral responses to infectious agents [J].
Burbelo, Peter D. ;
Ching, Kathryn H. ;
Bush, Emily R. ;
Han, Brian L. ;
Iadarola, Michael J. .
EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES, 2010, 9 (06) :567-578
[5]   Anti-HTLV antibody profiling reveals an antibody signature for HTLV-I-Associated Myelopathy/Tropical Spastic Paraparesis (HAM/TSP) [J].
Burbelo, Peter D. ;
Meoli, Elise ;
Leahy, Hannah P. ;
Graham, Jhanelle ;
Yao, Karen ;
Oh, Unsong ;
Janik, John E. ;
Mahieux, Renaud ;
Kashanchi, Fatah ;
Iadarola, Michael J. ;
Jacobson, Steven .
RETROVIROLOGY, 2008, 5 (1)
[6]  
Chen YMA, 1997, INT J CANCER, V71, P196, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970410)71:2<196::AID-IJC12>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-G
[8]   Considerations in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: Summary of a National Institutes of Health Workshop [J].
De Gruttola, VG ;
Clax, P ;
DeMets, DL ;
Downing, GJ ;
Ellenberg, SS ;
Friedman, L ;
Gail, MH ;
Prentice, R ;
Wittes, J ;
Zeger, SL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (05) :485-502
[9]  
DETHE G, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P4633
[10]  
GESSAIN A, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, pS5692