Nanofiltration process of glyphosate simulated wastewater

被引:9
作者
Liu, Z. Y. [1 ]
Xie, M. [1 ]
Ni, F. [1 ]
Xu, Y. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Technol, Coll Environm, Jiangsu Key Lab Ind Water Conservat & Emiss Reduc, Nanjing 210009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
glyphosate; nanofiltration; permeate flux; retention rate; simulated wastewater; SURFACE-CHARGE; HUMIC-ACID; REMOVAL; PH; CHLORINATION; RETENTION; MEMBRANES; MECHANISM; CALCIUM; SALT;
D O I
10.2166/wst.2012.808
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nanofiltration separation of glyphosate simulated wastewater was investigated using a DK membrane. The effects of operating parameters and the addition of impurities on membrane performance were studied in detail. It was found that at 20 degrees C, with a glyphosate concentration of 500 mg/L and pH of 2.96, the glyphosate retention rate and the membrane permeate flux increased slightly with increasing transmembrane pressure. With an increase in operating temperature, the permeate flux increased linearly while the retention rate decreased. The permeate flux and glyphosate retention rate decreased with increasing feed concentration. Within the pH range of 3-5, the glyphosate retention rate decreases with increasing pH and reaches a minimum at the isoelectric point of the membrane, while the permeate flux reaches a maximum level at this point. In the pH range of 5-11, with the increases of pH, the glyphosate retention rate increases and the permeate flux decreases. Glyphosate retention decreases slightly with increasing NaCl and phosphite concentrations. This can be explained in terms of the shielding phenomenon.
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 822
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Optimization of a nanofiltration membrane process for tomato industry wastewater effluent treatment [J].
Iaquinta, M. ;
Stoller, M. ;
Merli, C. .
DESALINATION, 2009, 245 (1-3) :314-320
[42]   A study on lupin beans process wastewater nanofiltration treatment and lupanine recovery [J].
Esteves, Teresa ;
Mota, Ana Teresa ;
Barbeitos, Catarina ;
Andrade, Kessia ;
Afonso, Carlos A. M. ;
Ferreira, Frederico Castelo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 277
[43]   Modeling of fluoride rejection from aqueous solution by nanofiltration process: single and binary solution [J].
Fatehizadeh, Ali ;
Amin, Mohammad Mehdi ;
Sillanpaa, Mika ;
Hatami, Nahid ;
Taheri, Ensiyeh ;
Baghaei, Najmeh ;
Mahajan, Shreya .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2020, 193 :224-234
[44]   Experimental study on nanofiltration separation of high concentrated saline glyphosate solution [J].
Tang Y. ;
Hu Y. ;
Yan Z. ;
Li C. .
Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2019, 70 (07) :2574-2583
[45]   Removal and recovery of perfluorooctanoate from wastewater by nanofiltration [J].
Hang, Xiaofeng ;
Chen, Xiangrong ;
Luo, Jianquan ;
Cao, Weifeng ;
Wan, Yinhua .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 145 :120-129
[46]   Potential of nanofiltration for phosphate removal from wastewater [J].
Visvanathan, C ;
Roy, PK .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 18 (05) :551-556
[47]   Nanofiltration membranes to reduce phenol concentration in wastewater [J].
Bodalo, A. ;
Gomez, E. ;
Hidalgo, A. M. ;
Gomez, M. ;
Murcia, M. D. ;
Lopez, I. .
DESALINATION, 2009, 245 (1-3) :680-686
[48]   Effect of powdered activated carbon on integrated submerged membrane bioreactor-nanofiltration process for wastewater reclamation [J].
Woo, Yun Chul ;
Lee, Jeong Jun ;
Shim, Wang-Geun ;
Shon, Ho Kyong ;
Tijing, Leonard D. ;
Yao, Minwei ;
Kim, Han-Seung .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 210 :18-25
[49]   TREATMENT OF WELDING ELECTRODE MANUFACTURING PLANT WASTEWATER USING COAGULATION/FLOCCULATION-NANOFILTRATION AS A HYBRID PROCESS [J].
Golestani, H. A. ;
Mousavi, M. ;
Borghei, M. .
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 28 (01) :73-79
[50]   Nanofiltration treatment of tomato paste processing wastewater: process modeling and optimization using response surface methodology [J].
Alghooneh, Ali ;
Razavi, Seyed M. A. ;
Mousavi, Seyed Mahmoud .
DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (21) :9609-9621